Cargando…

Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study

BACKGROUND: The respiratory related target motion and setup error will lead to a large margin in the gastric radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric benefit and the possibility of incorporating the breath-hold (BH) technique with online image-guided radiotherapy in t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hu, Weigang, Ye, Jinsong, Wang, Jiazhou, Xu, Qing, Zhang, Zhen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-98
_version_ 1782242970547781632
author Hu, Weigang
Ye, Jinsong
Wang, Jiazhou
Xu, Qing
Zhang, Zhen
author_facet Hu, Weigang
Ye, Jinsong
Wang, Jiazhou
Xu, Qing
Zhang, Zhen
author_sort Hu, Weigang
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The respiratory related target motion and setup error will lead to a large margin in the gastric radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric benefit and the possibility of incorporating the breath-hold (BH) technique with online image-guided radiotherapy in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: Setup errors and target motions of 22 post-operative gastric cancer patients with surgical clips were analyzed. Clips movement was recorded using the digital fluoroscopics and the probability distribution functions (pdf) of the target motions were created for both the free breathing (FB) and BH treatment. For dosimetric comparisons, two intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans, i.e. the free breathing treatment plan (IMRT(FB)) and the image-guided BH treatment plan (IMRT(IGBH)) using the same beam parameters were performed among 6 randomly selected patients. Different margins for FB and BH plans were derived. The plan dose map was convoluted with various pdfs of the setup errors and the target motions. Target coverage and dose to organs at risk were compared and the dose-escalation probability was assessed. RESULTS: The mean setup errors were 1.2 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), 0.0 mm in the left-right (LR), and 1.4 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. The mean target motion for the free breathing (vs. BH) was 11.1 mm (vs. 2.2 mm), 1.9 mm (vs. 1.1 mm), and 5.5 mm (vs. 1.7 mm) in the SI, LR, and AP direction, respectively. The target coverage was comparable for all the original plans. IMRT(IGBH) showed lower dose to the liver compared with IMRT(FB) (p = 0.01) but no significant difference in the kidneys. Convolved IMRT(IGBH) showed better sparing in kidneys (p < 0.01) and similar in liver (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Combining BH technique with online image guided IMRT can minimize the organ motion and improve the setup accuracy. The dosimetric comparison showed the dose could be escalated to 54 Gy without increasing the critical organs toxicities, although further clinical data is needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439279
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34392792012-09-17 Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study Hu, Weigang Ye, Jinsong Wang, Jiazhou Xu, Qing Zhang, Zhen Radiat Oncol Research BACKGROUND: The respiratory related target motion and setup error will lead to a large margin in the gastric radiotherapy. The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric benefit and the possibility of incorporating the breath-hold (BH) technique with online image-guided radiotherapy in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy. METHODS: Setup errors and target motions of 22 post-operative gastric cancer patients with surgical clips were analyzed. Clips movement was recorded using the digital fluoroscopics and the probability distribution functions (pdf) of the target motions were created for both the free breathing (FB) and BH treatment. For dosimetric comparisons, two intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans, i.e. the free breathing treatment plan (IMRT(FB)) and the image-guided BH treatment plan (IMRT(IGBH)) using the same beam parameters were performed among 6 randomly selected patients. Different margins for FB and BH plans were derived. The plan dose map was convoluted with various pdfs of the setup errors and the target motions. Target coverage and dose to organs at risk were compared and the dose-escalation probability was assessed. RESULTS: The mean setup errors were 1.2 mm in the superior-inferior (SI), 0.0 mm in the left-right (LR), and 1.4 mm in the anterior-posterior (AP) directions. The mean target motion for the free breathing (vs. BH) was 11.1 mm (vs. 2.2 mm), 1.9 mm (vs. 1.1 mm), and 5.5 mm (vs. 1.7 mm) in the SI, LR, and AP direction, respectively. The target coverage was comparable for all the original plans. IMRT(IGBH) showed lower dose to the liver compared with IMRT(FB) (p = 0.01) but no significant difference in the kidneys. Convolved IMRT(IGBH) showed better sparing in kidneys (p < 0.01) and similar in liver (p = 0.08). CONCLUSIONS: Combining BH technique with online image guided IMRT can minimize the organ motion and improve the setup accuracy. The dosimetric comparison showed the dose could be escalated to 54 Gy without increasing the critical organs toxicities, although further clinical data is needed. BioMed Central 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3439279/ /pubmed/22716276 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-98 Text en Copyright ©2012 Hu et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Hu, Weigang
Ye, Jinsong
Wang, Jiazhou
Xu, Qing
Zhang, Zhen
Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
title Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
title_full Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
title_fullStr Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
title_full_unstemmed Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
title_short Incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
title_sort incorporating breath holding and image guidance in the adjuvant gastric cancer radiotherapy: a dosimetric study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439279/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22716276
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-717X-7-98
work_keys_str_mv AT huweigang incorporatingbreathholdingandimageguidanceintheadjuvantgastriccancerradiotherapyadosimetricstudy
AT yejinsong incorporatingbreathholdingandimageguidanceintheadjuvantgastriccancerradiotherapyadosimetricstudy
AT wangjiazhou incorporatingbreathholdingandimageguidanceintheadjuvantgastriccancerradiotherapyadosimetricstudy
AT xuqing incorporatingbreathholdingandimageguidanceintheadjuvantgastriccancerradiotherapyadosimetricstudy
AT zhangzhen incorporatingbreathholdingandimageguidanceintheadjuvantgastriccancerradiotherapyadosimetricstudy