Cargando…

Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders

Quality measurement and feedback programs have become widespread and are looked upon as a cornerstone of quality improvement efforts. Often, such programs are used to motivate consumer choice through public report cards or to reward high quality care through pay for performance programs. Physicians’...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Landon, Bruce E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22913346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-1-27
_version_ 1782242998015229952
author Landon, Bruce E
author_facet Landon, Bruce E
author_sort Landon, Bruce E
collection PubMed
description Quality measurement and feedback programs have become widespread and are looked upon as a cornerstone of quality improvement efforts. Often, such programs are used to motivate consumer choice through public report cards or to reward high quality care through pay for performance programs. Physicians’ views on performance measurement and feedback programs, however, are rarely sought, despite the potential usefulness for improving the impact of such programs. The new IJHPR paper by Nissanholtz-Gannot and colleagues provides important data on physicians’ views of the Israeli quality measurement program that demonstrates strong support for the program among Israeli physicians while also identifying potential areas for improvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439395
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34393952012-09-12 Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders Landon, Bruce E Isr J Health Policy Res Commentary Quality measurement and feedback programs have become widespread and are looked upon as a cornerstone of quality improvement efforts. Often, such programs are used to motivate consumer choice through public report cards or to reward high quality care through pay for performance programs. Physicians’ views on performance measurement and feedback programs, however, are rarely sought, despite the potential usefulness for improving the impact of such programs. The new IJHPR paper by Nissanholtz-Gannot and colleagues provides important data on physicians’ views of the Israeli quality measurement program that demonstrates strong support for the program among Israeli physicians while also identifying potential areas for improvement. BioMed Central 2012-06-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3439395/ /pubmed/22913346 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-1-27 Text en Copyright ©2012 Landon; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Commentary
Landon, Bruce E
Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
title Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
title_full Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
title_fullStr Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
title_full_unstemmed Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
title_short Physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
title_sort physicians’ views of performance reports: grading the graders
topic Commentary
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439395/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22913346
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2045-4015-1-27
work_keys_str_mv AT landonbrucee physiciansviewsofperformancereportsgradingthegraders