Cargando…

Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations

PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of 3 silicone primers and 3 surface characterization of acrylic resin surface on bond strength between silicone elastomer and acrylic resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 Cosmesil silicones bonded to heat-curing acrylic resin were fabricated with...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shetty, Uttam Sadashiv, Guttal, Satyabodh Shesharaj
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977718
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.121
_version_ 1782243034436468736
author Shetty, Uttam Sadashiv
Guttal, Satyabodh Shesharaj
author_facet Shetty, Uttam Sadashiv
Guttal, Satyabodh Shesharaj
author_sort Shetty, Uttam Sadashiv
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of 3 silicone primers and 3 surface characterization of acrylic resin surface on bond strength between silicone elastomer and acrylic resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 Cosmesil silicones bonded to heat-curing acrylic resin were fabricated with the dimension of 75 × 10 × 3 mm. The 3 primers used in this study were G611 platinum primer, A-330 Gold platinum primer, and cyanoacrylates resin. Specimens without primer were used as control. The 3 types of surface characterization done were retentive holes with 1.5 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm deep, retentive beads of 0.6 mm diameter and the third type which was plain without any characterization. The specimens were then checked for bond strength by subjecting them to 180° peel test on a universal testing machine. The obtained results were then subjected to statistical analysis using 2-way ANOVA and Scheffé multiple post hoc procedures. The statistical significance was set at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: The maximum bond strength was seen for samples in which A-330G primer was used followed by G611 primer. The control group showed the minimum bond strength. Surface characterization of retentive holes increased the bond strength considerably as compared to retentive beads and samples without any surface characterization. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, A-330G primer was more compatible with Cosmesil M511 silicone and has better bonding of Cosmesil to acrylic resin. Retentive holes made on acrylic surface increased the bond strength considerably than those without any surface characterization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439620
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34396202012-09-13 Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations Shetty, Uttam Sadashiv Guttal, Satyabodh Shesharaj J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of the study was to evaluate the effect of 3 silicone primers and 3 surface characterization of acrylic resin surface on bond strength between silicone elastomer and acrylic resin. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 96 Cosmesil silicones bonded to heat-curing acrylic resin were fabricated with the dimension of 75 × 10 × 3 mm. The 3 primers used in this study were G611 platinum primer, A-330 Gold platinum primer, and cyanoacrylates resin. Specimens without primer were used as control. The 3 types of surface characterization done were retentive holes with 1.5 mm in diameter and 0.5 mm deep, retentive beads of 0.6 mm diameter and the third type which was plain without any characterization. The specimens were then checked for bond strength by subjecting them to 180° peel test on a universal testing machine. The obtained results were then subjected to statistical analysis using 2-way ANOVA and Scheffé multiple post hoc procedures. The statistical significance was set at 5% level of significance. RESULTS: The maximum bond strength was seen for samples in which A-330G primer was used followed by G611 primer. The control group showed the minimum bond strength. Surface characterization of retentive holes increased the bond strength considerably as compared to retentive beads and samples without any surface characterization. CONCLUSION: Within the limitations of the study, A-330G primer was more compatible with Cosmesil M511 silicone and has better bonding of Cosmesil to acrylic resin. Retentive holes made on acrylic surface increased the bond strength considerably than those without any surface characterization. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012-08 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3439620/ /pubmed/22977718 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.121 Text en © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shetty, Uttam Sadashiv
Guttal, Satyabodh Shesharaj
Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
title Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
title_full Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
title_fullStr Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
title_short Evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
title_sort evaluation of bonding efficiency between facial silicone and acrylic resin using different bonding agents and surface alterations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439620/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977718
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.121
work_keys_str_mv AT shettyuttamsadashiv evaluationofbondingefficiencybetweenfacialsiliconeandacrylicresinusingdifferentbondingagentsandsurfacealterations
AT guttalsatyabodhshesharaj evaluationofbondingefficiencybetweenfacialsiliconeandacrylicresinusingdifferentbondingagentsandsurfacealterations