Cargando…

Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study

PURPOSE: Many dentists use desensitizing agents to prevent hypersensitivity. This study compared and evaluated the effect of two desensitizing agents on the retention of cast crowns when cemented with various luting agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety freshly extracted human molars were prepared w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jalandar, Sonune Shital, Pandharinath, Dange Shankar, Arun, Khalikar, Smita, Vaidya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977719
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.127
_version_ 1782243034672398336
author Jalandar, Sonune Shital
Pandharinath, Dange Shankar
Arun, Khalikar
Smita, Vaidya
author_facet Jalandar, Sonune Shital
Pandharinath, Dange Shankar
Arun, Khalikar
Smita, Vaidya
author_sort Jalandar, Sonune Shital
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: Many dentists use desensitizing agents to prevent hypersensitivity. This study compared and evaluated the effect of two desensitizing agents on the retention of cast crowns when cemented with various luting agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety freshly extracted human molars were prepared with flat occlusal surface, 6 degree taper and approximately 4 mm axial length. The prepared specimens were divided into 3 groups and each group is further divided into 3 subgroups. Desensitizing agents used were GC Tooth Mousse and GLUMA® desensitizer. Cementing agents used were zinc phosphate, glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement. Individual crowns with loop were made from base metal alloy. Desensitizing agents were applied before cementation of crowns except for control group. Under tensional force the crowns were removed using an automated universal testing machine. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey-Kramer post hoc test at a preset alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: Resin modified glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest retentive strength and all dentin treatments resulted in significantly different retentive values (In Kg.): GLUMA (49.02 ± 3.32) > Control (48.61 ± 3.54) > Tooth mousse (48.34 ± 2.94). Retentive strength for glass ionomer cement were GLUMA (41.14 ± 2.42) > Tooth mousse (40.32 ± 3.89) > Control (39.09 ± 2.80). For zinc phosphate cement the retentive strength were lowest GLUMA (27.92 ± 3.20) > Control (27.69 ± 3.39) > Tooth mousse (25.27 ± 4.60). CONCLUSION: The use of GLUMA® desensitizer has no effect on crown retention. GC Tooth Mousse does not affect the retentive ability of glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement, but it decreases the retentive ability of zinc phosphate cement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439621
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34396212012-09-13 Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study Jalandar, Sonune Shital Pandharinath, Dange Shankar Arun, Khalikar Smita, Vaidya J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: Many dentists use desensitizing agents to prevent hypersensitivity. This study compared and evaluated the effect of two desensitizing agents on the retention of cast crowns when cemented with various luting agents. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ninety freshly extracted human molars were prepared with flat occlusal surface, 6 degree taper and approximately 4 mm axial length. The prepared specimens were divided into 3 groups and each group is further divided into 3 subgroups. Desensitizing agents used were GC Tooth Mousse and GLUMA® desensitizer. Cementing agents used were zinc phosphate, glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement. Individual crowns with loop were made from base metal alloy. Desensitizing agents were applied before cementation of crowns except for control group. Under tensional force the crowns were removed using an automated universal testing machine. Statistical analysis included one-way ANOVA followed by Turkey-Kramer post hoc test at a preset alpha of 0.05. RESULTS: Resin modified glass ionomer cement exhibited the highest retentive strength and all dentin treatments resulted in significantly different retentive values (In Kg.): GLUMA (49.02 ± 3.32) > Control (48.61 ± 3.54) > Tooth mousse (48.34 ± 2.94). Retentive strength for glass ionomer cement were GLUMA (41.14 ± 2.42) > Tooth mousse (40.32 ± 3.89) > Control (39.09 ± 2.80). For zinc phosphate cement the retentive strength were lowest GLUMA (27.92 ± 3.20) > Control (27.69 ± 3.39) > Tooth mousse (25.27 ± 4.60). CONCLUSION: The use of GLUMA® desensitizer has no effect on crown retention. GC Tooth Mousse does not affect the retentive ability of glass ionomer and resin modified glass ionomer cement, but it decreases the retentive ability of zinc phosphate cement. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012-08 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3439621/ /pubmed/22977719 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.127 Text en © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Jalandar, Sonune Shital
Pandharinath, Dange Shankar
Arun, Khalikar
Smita, Vaidya
Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
title Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
title_full Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
title_short Comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
title_sort comparison of effect of desensitizing agents on the retention of crowns cemented with luting agents: an in vitro study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439621/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977719
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.127
work_keys_str_mv AT jalandarsonuneshital comparisonofeffectofdesensitizingagentsontheretentionofcrownscementedwithlutingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT pandharinathdangeshankar comparisonofeffectofdesensitizingagentsontheretentionofcrownscementedwithlutingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT arunkhalikar comparisonofeffectofdesensitizingagentsontheretentionofcrownscementedwithlutingagentsaninvitrostudy
AT smitavaidya comparisonofeffectofdesensitizingagentsontheretentionofcrownscementedwithlutingagentsaninvitrostudy