Cargando…
Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty morse taper conventional abutmen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977724 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.158 |
_version_ | 1782243035846803456 |
---|---|
author | Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira |
author_facet | Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira |
author_sort | Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty morse taper conventional abutments (4.8 mm diameter) and smaller abutments (3.8 mm diameter) were tightened (20 Ncm) to their respective implants (3.5 × 11 mm) and after a 10 minute interval, implant/abutment assemblies were subjected to static compressive test, performed in a universal test machine with 1 mm/min displacement, at 45° inclination. The maximum deformation force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by student t test. RESULTS: Maximum deformation force of 4.8 mm and 3.8 mm abutments was approximately 95.33 kgf and 95.25 kgf, respectively, but no fractures were noted after mechanical test. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the evaluated abutments were statistically similar (P=.230). CONCLUSION: Abutment measuring 3.8 mm in diameter (reduced) presented mechanical properties similar to 4.8 mm (conventional) abutments, enabling its clinical use as indicated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3439626 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34396262012-09-13 Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty morse taper conventional abutments (4.8 mm diameter) and smaller abutments (3.8 mm diameter) were tightened (20 Ncm) to their respective implants (3.5 × 11 mm) and after a 10 minute interval, implant/abutment assemblies were subjected to static compressive test, performed in a universal test machine with 1 mm/min displacement, at 45° inclination. The maximum deformation force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by student t test. RESULTS: Maximum deformation force of 4.8 mm and 3.8 mm abutments was approximately 95.33 kgf and 95.25 kgf, respectively, but no fractures were noted after mechanical test. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the evaluated abutments were statistically similar (P=.230). CONCLUSION: Abutment measuring 3.8 mm in diameter (reduced) presented mechanical properties similar to 4.8 mm (conventional) abutments, enabling its clinical use as indicated. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012-08 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3439626/ /pubmed/22977724 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.158 Text en © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
title | Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
title_full | Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
title_fullStr | Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
title_full_unstemmed | Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
title_short | Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
title_sort | mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439626/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977724 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.158 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morisizabelacristinamauricio mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments AT fariaadrianaclaudialapria mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments AT demattosmariadagloriachiarello mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments AT ribeiroricardofaria mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments AT rodriguesrenatacristinasilveira mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments |