Cargando…

Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments

PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty morse taper conventional abutmen...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício, Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria, de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello, Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria, Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977724
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.158
_version_ 1782243035846803456
author Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício
Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria
de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello
Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira
author_facet Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício
Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria
de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello
Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira
author_sort Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty morse taper conventional abutments (4.8 mm diameter) and smaller abutments (3.8 mm diameter) were tightened (20 Ncm) to their respective implants (3.5 × 11 mm) and after a 10 minute interval, implant/abutment assemblies were subjected to static compressive test, performed in a universal test machine with 1 mm/min displacement, at 45° inclination. The maximum deformation force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by student t test. RESULTS: Maximum deformation force of 4.8 mm and 3.8 mm abutments was approximately 95.33 kgf and 95.25 kgf, respectively, but no fractures were noted after mechanical test. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the evaluated abutments were statistically similar (P=.230). CONCLUSION: Abutment measuring 3.8 mm in diameter (reduced) presented mechanical properties similar to 4.8 mm (conventional) abutments, enabling its clinical use as indicated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439626
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34396262012-09-13 Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira J Adv Prosthodont Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of the present study was to evaluate if a smaller morse taper abutment has a negative effect on the fracture resistance of implant-abutment connections under oblique compressive loads compared to a conventional abutment. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Twenty morse taper conventional abutments (4.8 mm diameter) and smaller abutments (3.8 mm diameter) were tightened (20 Ncm) to their respective implants (3.5 × 11 mm) and after a 10 minute interval, implant/abutment assemblies were subjected to static compressive test, performed in a universal test machine with 1 mm/min displacement, at 45° inclination. The maximum deformation force was determined. Data were statistically analyzed by student t test. RESULTS: Maximum deformation force of 4.8 mm and 3.8 mm abutments was approximately 95.33 kgf and 95.25 kgf, respectively, but no fractures were noted after mechanical test. Statistical analysis demonstrated that the evaluated abutments were statistically similar (P=.230). CONCLUSION: Abutment measuring 3.8 mm in diameter (reduced) presented mechanical properties similar to 4.8 mm (conventional) abutments, enabling its clinical use as indicated. The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics 2012-08 2012-08-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3439626/ /pubmed/22977724 http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.158 Text en © 2012 The Korean Academy of Prosthodontics http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Moris, Izabela Cristina Maurício
Faria, Adriana Cláudia Lapria
de Mattos, Maria da Gloria Chiarello
Ribeiro, Ricardo Faria
Rodrigues, Renata Cristina Silveira
Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
title Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
title_full Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
title_fullStr Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
title_full_unstemmed Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
title_short Mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
title_sort mechanical analysis of conventional and small diameter conical implant abutments
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439626/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22977724
http://dx.doi.org/10.4047/jap.2012.4.3.158
work_keys_str_mv AT morisizabelacristinamauricio mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments
AT fariaadrianaclaudialapria mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments
AT demattosmariadagloriachiarello mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments
AT ribeiroricardofaria mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments
AT rodriguesrenatacristinasilveira mechanicalanalysisofconventionalandsmalldiameterconicalimplantabutments