Cargando…

An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners

BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a prevalent and complex medical complaint often co-morbid with stress, anxiety, insomnia, depression, and cognitive or communication difficulties. Its chronicity places a major burden on primary and secondary healthcare services. In our recent national survey of General Pract...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fackrell, Kathryn, Hoare, Derek J, Smith, Sandra, McCormack, Abby, Hall, Deborah A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22788751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-70
_version_ 1782243049280110592
author Fackrell, Kathryn
Hoare, Derek J
Smith, Sandra
McCormack, Abby
Hall, Deborah A
author_facet Fackrell, Kathryn
Hoare, Derek J
Smith, Sandra
McCormack, Abby
Hall, Deborah A
author_sort Fackrell, Kathryn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a prevalent and complex medical complaint often co-morbid with stress, anxiety, insomnia, depression, and cognitive or communication difficulties. Its chronicity places a major burden on primary and secondary healthcare services. In our recent national survey of General Practitioners (GPs) from across England, many reported that their awareness of tinnitus was limited and as a result were dissatisfied with the service they currently provide. GPs identified 10 online sources of information they currently use in clinical practice, but welcomed further concise and accurate information on tinnitus assessment and management. The purpose of this study was to assess the content, reliability, and quality of the information related to primary care tinnitus assessment and management on these 10 websites. METHODS: Tinnitus related content on each website was assessed using a summative content analysis approach. Reliability and quality of the information was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire. RESULTS: Quality of information was rated using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Significant inter-rater reliability was confirmed by Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Wt) which ranged from 0.48 to 0.92 across websites. The website Map of Medicine achieved the highest overall DISCERN score. However, for information on treatment choice, the British Tinnitus Association was rated best. Content analysis revealed that all websites lacked a number of details relating to either tinnitus assessment or management options. CONCLUSIONS: No single website provides comprehensive information for GPs on tinnitus assessment and management and so GPs may need to refer to more than one if they want to maximise their coverage of the topic. From those preferred by GPs we recommend several specific websites as the current ‘best’ sources. Our findings should guide healthcare website providers to improve the quality and inclusiveness of the information they publish on tinnitus. In the case of one website, our preliminary findings are already doing so. Such developments will in turn help facilitate best practice in primary care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439701
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34397012012-09-13 An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners Fackrell, Kathryn Hoare, Derek J Smith, Sandra McCormack, Abby Hall, Deborah A BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Correspondence BACKGROUND: Tinnitus is a prevalent and complex medical complaint often co-morbid with stress, anxiety, insomnia, depression, and cognitive or communication difficulties. Its chronicity places a major burden on primary and secondary healthcare services. In our recent national survey of General Practitioners (GPs) from across England, many reported that their awareness of tinnitus was limited and as a result were dissatisfied with the service they currently provide. GPs identified 10 online sources of information they currently use in clinical practice, but welcomed further concise and accurate information on tinnitus assessment and management. The purpose of this study was to assess the content, reliability, and quality of the information related to primary care tinnitus assessment and management on these 10 websites. METHODS: Tinnitus related content on each website was assessed using a summative content analysis approach. Reliability and quality of the information was assessed using the DISCERN questionnaire. RESULTS: Quality of information was rated using the validated DISCERN questionnaire. Significant inter-rater reliability was confirmed by Kendall’s coefficient of concordance (Wt) which ranged from 0.48 to 0.92 across websites. The website Map of Medicine achieved the highest overall DISCERN score. However, for information on treatment choice, the British Tinnitus Association was rated best. Content analysis revealed that all websites lacked a number of details relating to either tinnitus assessment or management options. CONCLUSIONS: No single website provides comprehensive information for GPs on tinnitus assessment and management and so GPs may need to refer to more than one if they want to maximise their coverage of the topic. From those preferred by GPs we recommend several specific websites as the current ‘best’ sources. Our findings should guide healthcare website providers to improve the quality and inclusiveness of the information they publish on tinnitus. In the case of one website, our preliminary findings are already doing so. Such developments will in turn help facilitate best practice in primary care. BioMed Central 2012-07-12 /pmc/articles/PMC3439701/ /pubmed/22788751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-70 Text en Copyright ©2012 Fackrell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Correspondence
Fackrell, Kathryn
Hoare, Derek J
Smith, Sandra
McCormack, Abby
Hall, Deborah A
An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners
title An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners
title_full An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners
title_fullStr An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners
title_full_unstemmed An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners
title_short An evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by General Practitioners
title_sort evaluation of the content and quality of tinnitus information on websites preferred by general practitioners
topic Correspondence
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439701/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22788751
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-70
work_keys_str_mv AT fackrellkathryn anevaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT hoarederekj anevaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT smithsandra anevaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT mccormackabby anevaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT halldeboraha anevaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT fackrellkathryn evaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT hoarederekj evaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT smithsandra evaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT mccormackabby evaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners
AT halldeboraha evaluationofthecontentandqualityoftinnitusinformationonwebsitespreferredbygeneralpractitioners