Cargando…

Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae

BACKGROUND: Contagious agalactia (CA) of sheep and goats caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae is a widely occurring economically important disease that is difficult to control. The ELISA is commonly used for the serological detection of CA but it has some limitations and the performance of the available...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poumarat, François, Le Grand, Dominique, Gaurivaud, Patrice, Gay, Emilie, Chazel, Myriam, Game, Yvette, Bergonier, Dominique
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-109
_version_ 1782243049761406976
author Poumarat, François
Le Grand, Dominique
Gaurivaud, Patrice
Gay, Emilie
Chazel, Myriam
Game, Yvette
Bergonier, Dominique
author_facet Poumarat, François
Le Grand, Dominique
Gaurivaud, Patrice
Gay, Emilie
Chazel, Myriam
Game, Yvette
Bergonier, Dominique
author_sort Poumarat, François
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Contagious agalactia (CA) of sheep and goats caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae is a widely occurring economically important disease that is difficult to control. The ELISA is commonly used for the serological detection of CA but it has some limitations and the performance of the available tests have not been properly evaluated. Two commercial ELISA kits are widely used, one involving a fusion protein as target antigen and the other a total antigen. The objectives were to compare these tests by evaluating: i. Their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, the relevance of the recommended cut-off points, the correlation between the two tests, and, the correlation between serology data and the milk shedding of M. agalatiae; ii. The influence of extrinsic factors such as the targeted animal species, geographical origin of the samples, intra-specific variability of M. agalactiae and concurrent mycoplasma infections. A sample of 5900 animals from 211 farms with continuous CA monitoring for 20 years and no prior vaccination history was used. The infection status was known from prior bacteriological, epidemiological and serological monitoring with a complementary immunoblotting test. RESULTS: The average diagnostic sensitivity was 56% [51.8–59.8] for the fusion protein ELISA and 84% [81.3–87.2] for the total antigen ELISA, with noteworthy flock-related variations. The average diagnostic specificity for the fusion protein ELISA was 100% [99.9–100], and for the total antigen ELISA differed significantly between goats and sheep: 99.3% [97.4–99.9] and 95.7% [93.8–97.2] respectively. Experimental inoculations with different M. agalactiae strains revealed that the ELISA kits poorly detected the antibody response to certain strains. Furthermore, test performances varied according to the host species or geographical origin of the samples. Finally, the correlation between milk shedding of M. agalactiae and the presence of detectable antibodies in the blood was poor. CONCLUSIONS: These serological tests are not interchangeable. The choice of a test will depend on the objectives (early detection of infection or disease control program), on the prevalence of infection and the control protocol used. Given the variety of factors that may influence performance, a preliminary assessment of the test in a given situation is recommended prior to widespread use.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439703
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34397032012-09-13 Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae Poumarat, François Le Grand, Dominique Gaurivaud, Patrice Gay, Emilie Chazel, Myriam Game, Yvette Bergonier, Dominique BMC Vet Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Contagious agalactia (CA) of sheep and goats caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae is a widely occurring economically important disease that is difficult to control. The ELISA is commonly used for the serological detection of CA but it has some limitations and the performance of the available tests have not been properly evaluated. Two commercial ELISA kits are widely used, one involving a fusion protein as target antigen and the other a total antigen. The objectives were to compare these tests by evaluating: i. Their diagnostic sensitivity and specificity, the relevance of the recommended cut-off points, the correlation between the two tests, and, the correlation between serology data and the milk shedding of M. agalatiae; ii. The influence of extrinsic factors such as the targeted animal species, geographical origin of the samples, intra-specific variability of M. agalactiae and concurrent mycoplasma infections. A sample of 5900 animals from 211 farms with continuous CA monitoring for 20 years and no prior vaccination history was used. The infection status was known from prior bacteriological, epidemiological and serological monitoring with a complementary immunoblotting test. RESULTS: The average diagnostic sensitivity was 56% [51.8–59.8] for the fusion protein ELISA and 84% [81.3–87.2] for the total antigen ELISA, with noteworthy flock-related variations. The average diagnostic specificity for the fusion protein ELISA was 100% [99.9–100], and for the total antigen ELISA differed significantly between goats and sheep: 99.3% [97.4–99.9] and 95.7% [93.8–97.2] respectively. Experimental inoculations with different M. agalactiae strains revealed that the ELISA kits poorly detected the antibody response to certain strains. Furthermore, test performances varied according to the host species or geographical origin of the samples. Finally, the correlation between milk shedding of M. agalactiae and the presence of detectable antibodies in the blood was poor. CONCLUSIONS: These serological tests are not interchangeable. The choice of a test will depend on the objectives (early detection of infection or disease control program), on the prevalence of infection and the control protocol used. Given the variety of factors that may influence performance, a preliminary assessment of the test in a given situation is recommended prior to widespread use. BioMed Central 2012-07-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3439703/ /pubmed/22776779 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-109 Text en Copyright ©2012 Poumarat et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Poumarat, François
Le Grand, Dominique
Gaurivaud, Patrice
Gay, Emilie
Chazel, Myriam
Game, Yvette
Bergonier, Dominique
Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae
title Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae
title_full Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae
title_fullStr Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae
title_full_unstemmed Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae
title_short Comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial ELISA tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by Mycoplasma agalactiae
title_sort comparative assessment of two commonly used commercial elisa tests for the serological diagnosis of contagious agalactia of small ruminants caused by mycoplasma agalactiae
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439703/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22776779
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-8-109
work_keys_str_mv AT poumaratfrancois comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae
AT legranddominique comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae
AT gaurivaudpatrice comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae
AT gayemilie comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae
AT chazelmyriam comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae
AT gameyvette comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae
AT bergonierdominique comparativeassessmentoftwocommonlyusedcommercialelisatestsfortheserologicaldiagnosisofcontagiousagalactiaofsmallruminantscausedbymycoplasmaagalactiae