Cargando…

An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy

BACKGROUND: Tracheostomies are commonly performed on critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies and identify factors affecting outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who un...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ho, Yiu Ming, Wysocki, A. Peter, Hogan, James, White, Hayden
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988365
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.99124
_version_ 1782243065806716928
author Ho, Yiu Ming
Wysocki, A. Peter
Hogan, James
White, Hayden
author_facet Ho, Yiu Ming
Wysocki, A. Peter
Hogan, James
White, Hayden
author_sort Ho, Yiu Ming
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Tracheostomies are commonly performed on critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies and identify factors affecting outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent tracheostomy between January 1999 and June 2008 were identified on the basis of Diagnostic Related Group coding and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification procedural code. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Contingency tables were generated for clinical variables and a chi-squared test was used to determine significance. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients underwent tracheostomy between January 1999 and 30 June 2008. In-hospital mortality was 22.6%. The probability of death was found to be independent of timing of tracheostomy, technique used (percutaneous vs. surgical), number of failed extubations and obesity. On univariate analysis, the null hypothesis of independence was rejected for age on admission (P = 0.014), diagnosis of sepsis (P = 0.0008) or cardiac arrest (P = 0.0016), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P = 0.0319) and the Australasian Outcomes Research Tool for Intensive Care calculated risk of death (P = 0.0432). CONCLUSION: Although a number of patient factors are associated with worse outcome, tracheostomy appears to be a relatively safe technique in the Intensive Care Unit population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439770
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34397702012-09-17 An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy Ho, Yiu Ming Wysocki, A. Peter Hogan, James White, Hayden Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article BACKGROUND: Tracheostomies are commonly performed on critically ill patients requiring prolonged mechanical ventilation. The purpose of this study was to review our experience with surgical and percutaneous tracheostomies and identify factors affecting outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients who underwent tracheostomy between January 1999 and June 2008 were identified on the basis of Diagnostic Related Group coding and the International Statistical Classification of Diseases and Related Health Problems, Tenth Revision, Australian Modification procedural code. The primary endpoint was in-hospital mortality. Contingency tables were generated for clinical variables and a chi-squared test was used to determine significance. RESULTS: One hundred and sixty-eight patients underwent tracheostomy between January 1999 and 30 June 2008. In-hospital mortality was 22.6%. The probability of death was found to be independent of timing of tracheostomy, technique used (percutaneous vs. surgical), number of failed extubations and obesity. On univariate analysis, the null hypothesis of independence was rejected for age on admission (P = 0.014), diagnosis of sepsis (P = 0.0008) or cardiac arrest (P = 0.0016), Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II score (P = 0.0319) and the Australasian Outcomes Research Tool for Intensive Care calculated risk of death (P = 0.0432). CONCLUSION: Although a number of patient factors are associated with worse outcome, tracheostomy appears to be a relatively safe technique in the Intensive Care Unit population. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3439770/ /pubmed/22988365 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.99124 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ho, Yiu Ming
Wysocki, A. Peter
Hogan, James
White, Hayden
An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
title An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
title_full An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
title_fullStr An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
title_full_unstemmed An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
title_short An audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
title_sort audit of characteristics and outcomes in adult intensive care patients following tracheostomy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439770/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988365
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.99124
work_keys_str_mv AT hoyiuming anauditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT wysockiapeter anauditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT hoganjames anauditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT whitehayden anauditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT hoyiuming auditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT wysockiapeter auditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT hoganjames auditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy
AT whitehayden auditofcharacteristicsandoutcomesinadultintensivecarepatientsfollowingtracheostomy