Cargando…

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study

Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a frequently performed surgical procedure on critically ill patients. This study was designed to compare its two methods: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps (GWDF) technique and the ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator technique MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kumar, Mritunjay, Trikha, Anjan, Chandralekha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988363
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.99117
_version_ 1782243069424304128
author Kumar, Mritunjay
Trikha, Anjan
Chandralekha,
author_facet Kumar, Mritunjay
Trikha, Anjan
Chandralekha,
author_sort Kumar, Mritunjay
collection PubMed
description Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a frequently performed surgical procedure on critically ill patients. This study was designed to compare its two methods: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps (GWDF) technique and the ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator technique MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation and requiring tracheostomy were included in our prospective randomized study. The first group (GP-GWDF) underwent PDT by the GWDF technique and the second group by the ULTRA-perc technique (GP-UP). Time for the procedure and early and late procedural complications were recorded and compared in between the two groups. RESULTS: Time taken for tracheostomy was 11.68 ± 6.48 min for GP-GWDF and 13.93 ± 11.54 min for GP-UP (P-value 0.486). Desaturation was noted in two patients in GP-GWDF versus five in GP-UP (P-value = 0.195). Hypercapnea and rise in peak airway pressure occurred in one patient in GP-GWDF versus two in GP-UP (P-value = 0.543). Loss of airway was recorded in two patients in GP-UP and in none in GP-GWDF (P-value = 0.143). Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum occurred in one patient in GP-UP. No major complications were observed in GP-GWDF (P-value = 0.309). Hoarseness of voice was noted in one patient in each group (P-value = 0.659). CONCLUSION: Both the techniques seem to be equally reliable for carrying out PDT at bedside in the ICU.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3439784
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34397842012-09-17 Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study Kumar, Mritunjay Trikha, Anjan Chandralekha, Indian J Crit Care Med Research Article Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy (PDT) is a frequently performed surgical procedure on critically ill patients. This study was designed to compare its two methods: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps (GWDF) technique and the ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator technique MATERIALS AND METHODS: Thirty Intensive Care Unit (ICU) patients on prolonged mechanical ventilation and requiring tracheostomy were included in our prospective randomized study. The first group (GP-GWDF) underwent PDT by the GWDF technique and the second group by the ULTRA-perc technique (GP-UP). Time for the procedure and early and late procedural complications were recorded and compared in between the two groups. RESULTS: Time taken for tracheostomy was 11.68 ± 6.48 min for GP-GWDF and 13.93 ± 11.54 min for GP-UP (P-value 0.486). Desaturation was noted in two patients in GP-GWDF versus five in GP-UP (P-value = 0.195). Hypercapnea and rise in peak airway pressure occurred in one patient in GP-GWDF versus two in GP-UP (P-value = 0.543). Loss of airway was recorded in two patients in GP-UP and in none in GP-GWDF (P-value = 0.143). Subcutaneous emphysema, pneumothorax and pneumomediastinum occurred in one patient in GP-UP. No major complications were observed in GP-GWDF (P-value = 0.309). Hoarseness of voice was noted in one patient in each group (P-value = 0.659). CONCLUSION: Both the techniques seem to be equally reliable for carrying out PDT at bedside in the ICU. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3439784/ /pubmed/22988363 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.99117 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Critical Care Medicine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Kumar, Mritunjay
Trikha, Anjan
Chandralekha,
Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study
title Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study
title_full Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study
title_short Percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: Griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ULTRA-perc single-stage dilator – A prospective randomized study
title_sort percutaneous dilatational tracheostomy: griggs guide wire dilating forceps technique versus ultra-perc single-stage dilator – a prospective randomized study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3439784/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988363
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-5229.99117
work_keys_str_mv AT kumarmritunjay percutaneousdilatationaltracheostomygriggsguidewiredilatingforcepstechniqueversusultrapercsinglestagedilatoraprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT trikhaanjan percutaneousdilatationaltracheostomygriggsguidewiredilatingforcepstechniqueversusultrapercsinglestagedilatoraprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT chandralekha percutaneousdilatationaltracheostomygriggsguidewiredilatingforcepstechniqueversusultrapercsinglestagedilatoraprospectiverandomizedstudy