Cargando…

Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health

Background: Many bacteria of clinical importance survive and may grow in different environments. Antibiotic pollution may exert on them a selective pressure leading to an increase in the prevalence of resistance. Objectives: In this study we sought to determine whether environmental concentrations o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tello, Alfredo, Austin, Brian, Telfer, Trevor C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22571927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104650
_version_ 1782243113858760704
author Tello, Alfredo
Austin, Brian
Telfer, Trevor C
author_facet Tello, Alfredo
Austin, Brian
Telfer, Trevor C
author_sort Tello, Alfredo
collection PubMed
description Background: Many bacteria of clinical importance survive and may grow in different environments. Antibiotic pollution may exert on them a selective pressure leading to an increase in the prevalence of resistance. Objectives: In this study we sought to determine whether environmental concentrations of antibiotics and concentrations representing action limits used in environmental risk assessment may exert a selective pressure on clinically relevant bacteria in the environment. Methods: We used bacterial inhibition as an assessment end point to link antibiotic selective pressures to the prevalence of resistance in bacterial populations. Species sensitivity distributions were derived for three antibiotics by fitting log-logistic models to end points calculated from minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions based on worldwide data collated by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). To place bacteria represented in these distributions in a broader context, we performed a brief phylogenetic analysis. The potentially affected fraction of bacterial genera at measured environmental concentrations of antibiotics and environmental risk assessment action limits was used as a proxy for antibiotic selective pressure. Measured environmental concentrations and environmental risk assessment action limits were also directly compared to wild-type cut-off values. Results: The potentially affected fraction of bacterial genera estimated based on antibiotic concentrations measured in water environments is ≤ 7%. We estimated that measured environmental concentrations in river sediments, swine feces lagoons, liquid manure, and farmed soil inhibit wild-type populations in up to 60%, 92%, 100%, and 30% of bacterial genera, respectively. At concentrations used as action limits in environmental risk assessment, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin were estimated to inhibit wild-type populations in up to 25% and 76% of bacterial genera. Conclusions: Measured environmental concentrations of antibiotics, as well as concentrations representing environmental risk assessment action limits, are high enough to exert a selective pressure on clinically relevant bacteria that may lead to an increase in the prevalence of resistance.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3440082
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34400822012-09-12 Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health Tello, Alfredo Austin, Brian Telfer, Trevor C Environ Health Perspect Research Background: Many bacteria of clinical importance survive and may grow in different environments. Antibiotic pollution may exert on them a selective pressure leading to an increase in the prevalence of resistance. Objectives: In this study we sought to determine whether environmental concentrations of antibiotics and concentrations representing action limits used in environmental risk assessment may exert a selective pressure on clinically relevant bacteria in the environment. Methods: We used bacterial inhibition as an assessment end point to link antibiotic selective pressures to the prevalence of resistance in bacterial populations. Species sensitivity distributions were derived for three antibiotics by fitting log-logistic models to end points calculated from minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC) distributions based on worldwide data collated by the European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing (EUCAST). To place bacteria represented in these distributions in a broader context, we performed a brief phylogenetic analysis. The potentially affected fraction of bacterial genera at measured environmental concentrations of antibiotics and environmental risk assessment action limits was used as a proxy for antibiotic selective pressure. Measured environmental concentrations and environmental risk assessment action limits were also directly compared to wild-type cut-off values. Results: The potentially affected fraction of bacterial genera estimated based on antibiotic concentrations measured in water environments is ≤ 7%. We estimated that measured environmental concentrations in river sediments, swine feces lagoons, liquid manure, and farmed soil inhibit wild-type populations in up to 60%, 92%, 100%, and 30% of bacterial genera, respectively. At concentrations used as action limits in environmental risk assessment, erythromycin and ciprofloxacin were estimated to inhibit wild-type populations in up to 25% and 76% of bacterial genera. Conclusions: Measured environmental concentrations of antibiotics, as well as concentrations representing environmental risk assessment action limits, are high enough to exert a selective pressure on clinically relevant bacteria that may lead to an increase in the prevalence of resistance. National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences 2012-05-08 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3440082/ /pubmed/22571927 http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104650 Text en http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/mark/1.0/ Publication of EHP lies in the public domain and is therefore without copyright. All text from EHP may be reprinted freely. Use of materials published in EHP should be acknowledged (for example, ?Reproduced with permission from Environmental Health Perspectives?); pertinent reference information should be provided for the article from which the material was reproduced. Articles from EHP, especially the News section, may contain photographs or illustrations copyrighted by other commercial organizations or individuals that may not be used without obtaining prior approval from the holder of the copyright.
spellingShingle Research
Tello, Alfredo
Austin, Brian
Telfer, Trevor C
Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health
title Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health
title_full Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health
title_fullStr Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health
title_full_unstemmed Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health
title_short Selective Pressure of Antibiotic Pollution on Bacteria of Importance to Public Health
title_sort selective pressure of antibiotic pollution on bacteria of importance to public health
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440082/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22571927
http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1104650
work_keys_str_mv AT telloalfredo selectivepressureofantibioticpollutiononbacteriaofimportancetopublichealth
AT austinbrian selectivepressureofantibioticpollutiononbacteriaofimportancetopublichealth
AT telfertrevorc selectivepressureofantibioticpollutiononbacteriaofimportancetopublichealth