Cargando…
Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil?
The management of appendiceal mass remains a matter of major controversy in the current literature. Currently, initial nonoperative management followed by interval appendectomy is favored over immediate appendicectomy. However, the necessity of doing an interval appendectomy has been questioned – is...
Autor principal: | |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.99683 |
_version_ | 1782243199433048064 |
---|---|
author | Quartey, Benjamin |
author_facet | Quartey, Benjamin |
author_sort | Quartey, Benjamin |
collection | PubMed |
description | The management of appendiceal mass remains a matter of major controversy in the current literature. Currently, initial nonoperative management followed by interval appendectomy is favored over immediate appendicectomy. However, the necessity of doing an interval appendectomy has been questioned – is it a necessary evil? The present review revisits the above controversy, evaluates the current literature, assesses the need for interval appendectomy in adults, and provides recommendations. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3440885 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34408852012-09-17 Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? Quartey, Benjamin J Emerg Trauma Shock Expert Commentary The management of appendiceal mass remains a matter of major controversy in the current literature. Currently, initial nonoperative management followed by interval appendectomy is favored over immediate appendicectomy. However, the necessity of doing an interval appendectomy has been questioned – is it a necessary evil? The present review revisits the above controversy, evaluates the current literature, assesses the need for interval appendectomy in adults, and provides recommendations. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3440885/ /pubmed/22988397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.99683 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Expert Commentary Quartey, Benjamin Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? |
title | Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? |
title_full | Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? |
title_fullStr | Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? |
title_full_unstemmed | Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? |
title_short | Interval appendectomy in adults: A necessary evil? |
title_sort | interval appendectomy in adults: a necessary evil? |
topic | Expert Commentary |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440885/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988397 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.99683 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT quarteybenjamin intervalappendectomyinadultsanecessaryevil |