Cargando…

Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?

BACKGROUND: Patients with head injury continue to improve over time and a minimum follow-up of six months is considered necessary to evaluate outcome. However, this may be difficult to assess due to lack of follow-up. It is also well known that operated patients who return for cranioplasty usually h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agrawal, Deepak, Joshua, Shejoy P, Gupta, Deepak, Sinha, Sumit, Satyarthee, G D
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988398
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.99685
_version_ 1782243199660589056
author Agrawal, Deepak
Joshua, Shejoy P
Gupta, Deepak
Sinha, Sumit
Satyarthee, G D
author_facet Agrawal, Deepak
Joshua, Shejoy P
Gupta, Deepak
Sinha, Sumit
Satyarthee, G D
author_sort Agrawal, Deepak
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Patients with head injury continue to improve over time and a minimum follow-up of six months is considered necessary to evaluate outcome. However, this may be difficult to assess due to lack of follow-up. It is also well known that operated patients who return for cranioplasty usually have the best outcome. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcome following severe head injury using cranioplasty as a surrogate marker for good outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study carried out from January 2009 to December 2010. All patients with severe head injury who underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC) in the study period were included. Patients who came back for cranioplasty in the same period were also included. Case records, imaging and follow up visit data from all patients were reviewed. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge were assessed. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS: Of the 273 patients, 84.25% (n=230) were males and 15.75% (n= 43) were females. The mean age was 34.3 years (range 2-81 years, SD 16.817). The mean GCS on admission was 5.615 (range 3-8, SD 1.438). The in-hospital mortality was 54% (n=149). Good outcome (GOS of 4 or 5) at discharge was attained in 22% (n=60) patients. Sixty five patients returned for cranioplasty (with a GOS of 4 or 5) during the study period. There was no statistical difference in the number of patients discharged with good outcome and those coming back for cranioplasty in the study period (P>0.5). Patients who came back for cranioplasty were younger in age (mean age 28.815 years SD 13.396) with better admission GCS prior to DC (mean GCS 6.32 SD1.39). CONCLUSIONS: In operated severe head injury patients significant number of patients (24% in our study) have excellent outcome. However, insignificant number of patients had further improvement to GOS 4 or 5 (good outcome) from the time of initial discharge. This suggests that due to lack of intensive rehabilitative facilities, GOS at discharge may be representative of final outcome in the vast majority of cases of severe head injury in developing countries like India
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3440886
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34408862012-09-17 Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury? Agrawal, Deepak Joshua, Shejoy P Gupta, Deepak Sinha, Sumit Satyarthee, G D J Emerg Trauma Shock Original Article BACKGROUND: Patients with head injury continue to improve over time and a minimum follow-up of six months is considered necessary to evaluate outcome. However, this may be difficult to assess due to lack of follow-up. It is also well known that operated patients who return for cranioplasty usually have the best outcome. AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To assess the outcome following severe head injury using cranioplasty as a surrogate marker for good outcome. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a retrospective study carried out from January 2009 to December 2010. All patients with severe head injury who underwent decompressive craniectomy (DC) in the study period were included. Patients who came back for cranioplasty in the same period were also included. Case records, imaging and follow up visit data from all patients were reviewed. Glasgow Coma Score (GCS) on admission and Glasgow Outcome Score (GOS) at discharge were assessed. OBSERVATIONS AND RESULTS: Of the 273 patients, 84.25% (n=230) were males and 15.75% (n= 43) were females. The mean age was 34.3 years (range 2-81 years, SD 16.817). The mean GCS on admission was 5.615 (range 3-8, SD 1.438). The in-hospital mortality was 54% (n=149). Good outcome (GOS of 4 or 5) at discharge was attained in 22% (n=60) patients. Sixty five patients returned for cranioplasty (with a GOS of 4 or 5) during the study period. There was no statistical difference in the number of patients discharged with good outcome and those coming back for cranioplasty in the study period (P>0.5). Patients who came back for cranioplasty were younger in age (mean age 28.815 years SD 13.396) with better admission GCS prior to DC (mean GCS 6.32 SD1.39). CONCLUSIONS: In operated severe head injury patients significant number of patients (24% in our study) have excellent outcome. However, insignificant number of patients had further improvement to GOS 4 or 5 (good outcome) from the time of initial discharge. This suggests that due to lack of intensive rehabilitative facilities, GOS at discharge may be representative of final outcome in the vast majority of cases of severe head injury in developing countries like India Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3440886/ /pubmed/22988398 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.99685 Text en Copyright: © Journal of Emergencies, Trauma, and Shock http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Agrawal, Deepak
Joshua, Shejoy P
Gupta, Deepak
Sinha, Sumit
Satyarthee, G D
Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
title Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
title_full Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
title_fullStr Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
title_full_unstemmed Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
title_short Can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
title_sort can glasgow score at discharge represent final outcome in severe head injury?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3440886/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22988398
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0974-2700.99685
work_keys_str_mv AT agrawaldeepak canglasgowscoreatdischargerepresentfinaloutcomeinsevereheadinjury
AT joshuashejoyp canglasgowscoreatdischargerepresentfinaloutcomeinsevereheadinjury
AT guptadeepak canglasgowscoreatdischargerepresentfinaloutcomeinsevereheadinjury
AT sinhasumit canglasgowscoreatdischargerepresentfinaloutcomeinsevereheadinjury
AT satyartheegd canglasgowscoreatdischargerepresentfinaloutcomeinsevereheadinjury