Cargando…

In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy

BACKGROUND: Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated DSAEK interface with in vivo laser confocal micro...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrari, Giulio, Reichegger, Verena, Ludergnani, Luca, Delfini, Elisabetta, Macaluso, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22853313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-32
_version_ 1782243239024132096
author Ferrari, Giulio
Reichegger, Verena
Ludergnani, Luca
Delfini, Elisabetta
Macaluso, Claudio
author_facet Ferrari, Giulio
Reichegger, Verena
Ludergnani, Luca
Delfini, Elisabetta
Macaluso, Claudio
author_sort Ferrari, Giulio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated DSAEK interface with in vivo laser confocal microscopy (LCM) in order to: (i) correlate interface status with best corrected visual acuity, and (ii) with time from surgery; (iii) correlate interface particle number with best corrected visual acuity. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles at the interface were counted. METHODS: 18 eyes of 16 patients (6 males and 10 females); mean age: 74 ± 8.3 years which underwent DSAEK were examined by means of in vivo laser confocal microscopy between 1 and 24 months after surgery. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles present at the interface were counted. RESULTS: Interface reflectivity was 2.17 ± 1.2 and significantly correlated with visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.83; P < 0.001), and with time after surgery (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.87; P < 0.001). Visual acuity was 0.67 ± 0.27. The number of particles was 205 ± 117.8; no correlation was found between this number and visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.41; P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: DSAEK interface imaged with LCM is helpful in diagnosing poor host-donor interface quality in DSAEK surgery. A good quality interface is related to a better visual acuity. Moreover, the quality of the interface appears to improve as time passes from the surgery. Interface quality is related with visual acuity and improves with time from surgery. LCM should be considered as an added tool in post-DSAEK follow-up of patients. Finally, our study shows that the presence of particles does not influence visual outcome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3441224
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34412242012-09-14 In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy Ferrari, Giulio Reichegger, Verena Ludergnani, Luca Delfini, Elisabetta Macaluso, Claudio BMC Ophthalmol Research Article BACKGROUND: Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK) allows selective replacement of the endothelium. Post-operative haze and particles can affect the interface quality and, ultimately, visual outcome. In this study, we evaluated DSAEK interface with in vivo laser confocal microscopy (LCM) in order to: (i) correlate interface status with best corrected visual acuity, and (ii) with time from surgery; (iii) correlate interface particle number with best corrected visual acuity. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles at the interface were counted. METHODS: 18 eyes of 16 patients (6 males and 10 females); mean age: 74 ± 8.3 years which underwent DSAEK were examined by means of in vivo laser confocal microscopy between 1 and 24 months after surgery. Host-donor interface was imaged and graded using a published reflectivity scale. Particles present at the interface were counted. RESULTS: Interface reflectivity was 2.17 ± 1.2 and significantly correlated with visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.83; P < 0.001), and with time after surgery (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.87; P < 0.001). Visual acuity was 0.67 ± 0.27. The number of particles was 205 ± 117.8; no correlation was found between this number and visual acuity (Spearman correlation coefficient −0.41; P = 0.15). CONCLUSION: DSAEK interface imaged with LCM is helpful in diagnosing poor host-donor interface quality in DSAEK surgery. A good quality interface is related to a better visual acuity. Moreover, the quality of the interface appears to improve as time passes from the surgery. Interface quality is related with visual acuity and improves with time from surgery. LCM should be considered as an added tool in post-DSAEK follow-up of patients. Finally, our study shows that the presence of particles does not influence visual outcome. BioMed Central 2012-08-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3441224/ /pubmed/22853313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-32 Text en Copyright ©2012 Ferrari et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Ferrari, Giulio
Reichegger, Verena
Ludergnani, Luca
Delfini, Elisabetta
Macaluso, Claudio
In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
title In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
title_full In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
title_fullStr In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
title_full_unstemmed In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
title_short In vivo evaluation of DSAEK interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
title_sort in vivo evaluation of dsaek interface with scanning-laser confocal microscopy
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441224/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22853313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2415-12-32
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrarigiulio invivoevaluationofdsaekinterfacewithscanninglaserconfocalmicroscopy
AT reicheggerverena invivoevaluationofdsaekinterfacewithscanninglaserconfocalmicroscopy
AT ludergnaniluca invivoevaluationofdsaekinterfacewithscanninglaserconfocalmicroscopy
AT delfinielisabetta invivoevaluationofdsaekinterfacewithscanninglaserconfocalmicroscopy
AT macalusoclaudio invivoevaluationofdsaekinterfacewithscanninglaserconfocalmicroscopy