Cargando…

Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature

BACKGROUND: Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) stimulation for the treatment of bone nonunion or delayed union have been in use for several years, but on a limited basis. The aim of this study was to assess the overall efficacy of the method in tibial delayed unions and nonunions and identify fact...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Assiotis, Aggelos, Sachinis, Nick P, Chalidis, Byron E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22681718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-24
_version_ 1782243239246430208
author Assiotis, Aggelos
Sachinis, Nick P
Chalidis, Byron E
author_facet Assiotis, Aggelos
Sachinis, Nick P
Chalidis, Byron E
author_sort Assiotis, Aggelos
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) stimulation for the treatment of bone nonunion or delayed union have been in use for several years, but on a limited basis. The aim of this study was to assess the overall efficacy of the method in tibial delayed unions and nonunions and identify factors that could affect the final outcome. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed 44 patients (27 men) with a mean age of 49.6 ± 18.4 years that received PEMF therapy due to tibial shaft delayed union or nonunion. In all cases, fracture gap was less than 1 cm and infection or soft tissue defects were absent. RESULTS: Fracture union was confirmed in 34 cases (77.3%). No relationship was found between union rate and age (p = 0.819), fracture side (left or right) (p = 0.734), fracture type (simple or comminuted, open or closed) (p = 0.111), smoking (p = 0.245), diabetes (p = 0.68) and initial treatment method applied (plates, nail, plaster of paris) (p = 0.395). The time of treatment onset didn’t affect the incidence of fracture healing (p = 0.841). Although statistical significance was not demonstrated, longer treatment duration showed a trend of increased probability of union (p = 0.081). CONCLUSION: PEMF stimulation is an effective non-invasive method for addressing non-infected tibial union abnormalities. Its success is not associated with specific fracture or patient related variables and it couldn’t be clearly considered a time-dependent phenomenon.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3441225
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34412252012-09-14 Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature Assiotis, Aggelos Sachinis, Nick P Chalidis, Byron E J Orthop Surg Res Research Article BACKGROUND: Pulsed electromagnetic fields (PEMF) stimulation for the treatment of bone nonunion or delayed union have been in use for several years, but on a limited basis. The aim of this study was to assess the overall efficacy of the method in tibial delayed unions and nonunions and identify factors that could affect the final outcome. METHODS: We prospectively reviewed 44 patients (27 men) with a mean age of 49.6 ± 18.4 years that received PEMF therapy due to tibial shaft delayed union or nonunion. In all cases, fracture gap was less than 1 cm and infection or soft tissue defects were absent. RESULTS: Fracture union was confirmed in 34 cases (77.3%). No relationship was found between union rate and age (p = 0.819), fracture side (left or right) (p = 0.734), fracture type (simple or comminuted, open or closed) (p = 0.111), smoking (p = 0.245), diabetes (p = 0.68) and initial treatment method applied (plates, nail, plaster of paris) (p = 0.395). The time of treatment onset didn’t affect the incidence of fracture healing (p = 0.841). Although statistical significance was not demonstrated, longer treatment duration showed a trend of increased probability of union (p = 0.081). CONCLUSION: PEMF stimulation is an effective non-invasive method for addressing non-infected tibial union abnormalities. Its success is not associated with specific fracture or patient related variables and it couldn’t be clearly considered a time-dependent phenomenon. BioMed Central 2012-06-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3441225/ /pubmed/22681718 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-24 Text en Copyright ©2012 Assiotis et al.; Licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Assiotis, Aggelos
Sachinis, Nick P
Chalidis, Byron E
Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature
title Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature
title_full Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature
title_fullStr Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature
title_full_unstemmed Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature
title_short Pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. A prospective clinical study and review of the literature
title_sort pulsed electromagnetic fields for the treatment of tibial delayed unions and nonunions. a prospective clinical study and review of the literature
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441225/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22681718
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1749-799X-7-24
work_keys_str_mv AT assiotisaggelos pulsedelectromagneticfieldsforthetreatmentoftibialdelayedunionsandnonunionsaprospectiveclinicalstudyandreviewoftheliterature
AT sachinisnickp pulsedelectromagneticfieldsforthetreatmentoftibialdelayedunionsandnonunionsaprospectiveclinicalstudyandreviewoftheliterature
AT chalidisbyrone pulsedelectromagneticfieldsforthetreatmentoftibialdelayedunionsandnonunionsaprospectiveclinicalstudyandreviewoftheliterature