Cargando…
Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, te...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22534075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-196 |
_version_ | 1782243243930419200 |
---|---|
author | Feigelson, Heather Spencer Goddard, Katrina AB Johnson, Monique A Funk, Kellyan C Rahm, Alanna Kulchak Kauffman, Tia L Chitale, Dhananjay A Le Marchand, Loic Richards, C Sue |
author_facet | Feigelson, Heather Spencer Goddard, Katrina AB Johnson, Monique A Funk, Kellyan C Rahm, Alanna Kulchak Kauffman, Tia L Chitale, Dhananjay A Le Marchand, Loic Richards, C Sue |
author_sort | Feigelson, Heather Spencer |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, techniques for tumor enrichment, DNA preparation, assay design and sensitivity. We evaluated comparability and consistency of KRAS test results among five laboratories currently being used to determine KRAS mutation status of metastatic colorectal cancer specimens in a large, multi-center observational study. FINDINGS: Twenty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human colorectal cancer samples from colon resections previously tested for KRAS mutations were selected based on mutation status (6 wild type, 8 codon 12 mutations, and 6 codon 13 mutations). We found good agreement across laboratories despite differences in mutation detection methods. Eighteen of twenty samples (90%) were concordant across all five labs. Discordant results are likely not due to laboratory error, but instead to tumor heterogeneity, contamination of the tumor sample with normal tissue, or analytic factors affecting assay sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate commercial and academic laboratories provide reliable results for the common KRAS gene mutations at codons 12 and 13 when an adequate percentage of tumor cells is present in the sample. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3441241 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34412412012-09-14 Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories Feigelson, Heather Spencer Goddard, Katrina AB Johnson, Monique A Funk, Kellyan C Rahm, Alanna Kulchak Kauffman, Tia L Chitale, Dhananjay A Le Marchand, Loic Richards, C Sue BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, techniques for tumor enrichment, DNA preparation, assay design and sensitivity. We evaluated comparability and consistency of KRAS test results among five laboratories currently being used to determine KRAS mutation status of metastatic colorectal cancer specimens in a large, multi-center observational study. FINDINGS: Twenty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human colorectal cancer samples from colon resections previously tested for KRAS mutations were selected based on mutation status (6 wild type, 8 codon 12 mutations, and 6 codon 13 mutations). We found good agreement across laboratories despite differences in mutation detection methods. Eighteen of twenty samples (90%) were concordant across all five labs. Discordant results are likely not due to laboratory error, but instead to tumor heterogeneity, contamination of the tumor sample with normal tissue, or analytic factors affecting assay sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate commercial and academic laboratories provide reliable results for the common KRAS gene mutations at codons 12 and 13 when an adequate percentage of tumor cells is present in the sample. BioMed Central 2012-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3441241/ /pubmed/22534075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-196 Text en Copyright ©2012 Feigelson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Short Report Feigelson, Heather Spencer Goddard, Katrina AB Johnson, Monique A Funk, Kellyan C Rahm, Alanna Kulchak Kauffman, Tia L Chitale, Dhananjay A Le Marchand, Loic Richards, C Sue Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
title | Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
title_full | Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
title_fullStr | Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
title_full_unstemmed | Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
title_short | Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
title_sort | reliability of kras mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories |
topic | Short Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441241/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22534075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-196 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT feigelsonheatherspencer reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT goddardkatrinaab reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT johnsonmoniquea reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT funkkellyanc reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT rahmalannakulchak reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT kauffmantial reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT chitaledhananjaya reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT lemarchandloic reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories AT richardscsue reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories |