Cargando…

Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories

BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feigelson, Heather Spencer, Goddard, Katrina AB, Johnson, Monique A, Funk, Kellyan C, Rahm, Alanna Kulchak, Kauffman, Tia L, Chitale, Dhananjay A, Le Marchand, Loic, Richards, C Sue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22534075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-196
_version_ 1782243243930419200
author Feigelson, Heather Spencer
Goddard, Katrina AB
Johnson, Monique A
Funk, Kellyan C
Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
Kauffman, Tia L
Chitale, Dhananjay A
Le Marchand, Loic
Richards, C Sue
author_facet Feigelson, Heather Spencer
Goddard, Katrina AB
Johnson, Monique A
Funk, Kellyan C
Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
Kauffman, Tia L
Chitale, Dhananjay A
Le Marchand, Loic
Richards, C Sue
author_sort Feigelson, Heather Spencer
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, techniques for tumor enrichment, DNA preparation, assay design and sensitivity. We evaluated comparability and consistency of KRAS test results among five laboratories currently being used to determine KRAS mutation status of metastatic colorectal cancer specimens in a large, multi-center observational study. FINDINGS: Twenty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human colorectal cancer samples from colon resections previously tested for KRAS mutations were selected based on mutation status (6 wild type, 8 codon 12 mutations, and 6 codon 13 mutations). We found good agreement across laboratories despite differences in mutation detection methods. Eighteen of twenty samples (90%) were concordant across all five labs. Discordant results are likely not due to laboratory error, but instead to tumor heterogeneity, contamination of the tumor sample with normal tissue, or analytic factors affecting assay sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate commercial and academic laboratories provide reliable results for the common KRAS gene mutations at codons 12 and 13 when an adequate percentage of tumor cells is present in the sample.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3441241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34412412012-09-14 Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories Feigelson, Heather Spencer Goddard, Katrina AB Johnson, Monique A Funk, Kellyan C Rahm, Alanna Kulchak Kauffman, Tia L Chitale, Dhananjay A Le Marchand, Loic Richards, C Sue BMC Res Notes Short Report BACKGROUND: Mutations in the KRAS gene are associated with poor response to epidermal growth factor receptor inhibitors used in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer. Factors influencing KRAS test results in tumor specimens include: tumor heterogeneity, sample handling, slide preparation, techniques for tumor enrichment, DNA preparation, assay design and sensitivity. We evaluated comparability and consistency of KRAS test results among five laboratories currently being used to determine KRAS mutation status of metastatic colorectal cancer specimens in a large, multi-center observational study. FINDINGS: Twenty formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded human colorectal cancer samples from colon resections previously tested for KRAS mutations were selected based on mutation status (6 wild type, 8 codon 12 mutations, and 6 codon 13 mutations). We found good agreement across laboratories despite differences in mutation detection methods. Eighteen of twenty samples (90%) were concordant across all five labs. Discordant results are likely not due to laboratory error, but instead to tumor heterogeneity, contamination of the tumor sample with normal tissue, or analytic factors affecting assay sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate commercial and academic laboratories provide reliable results for the common KRAS gene mutations at codons 12 and 13 when an adequate percentage of tumor cells is present in the sample. BioMed Central 2012-04-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3441241/ /pubmed/22534075 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-196 Text en Copyright ©2012 Feigelson et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Short Report
Feigelson, Heather Spencer
Goddard, Katrina AB
Johnson, Monique A
Funk, Kellyan C
Rahm, Alanna Kulchak
Kauffman, Tia L
Chitale, Dhananjay A
Le Marchand, Loic
Richards, C Sue
Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
title Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
title_full Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
title_fullStr Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
title_full_unstemmed Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
title_short Reliability of KRAS mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
title_sort reliability of kras mutation testing in metastatic colorectal cancer patients across five laboratories
topic Short Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22534075
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-196
work_keys_str_mv AT feigelsonheatherspencer reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT goddardkatrinaab reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT johnsonmoniquea reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT funkkellyanc reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT rahmalannakulchak reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT kauffmantial reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT chitaledhananjaya reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT lemarchandloic reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories
AT richardscsue reliabilityofkrasmutationtestinginmetastaticcolorectalcancerpatientsacrossfivelaboratories