Cargando…

A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial

BACKGROUND: Childhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Elizabeth, McCabe, Patricia, Ballard, Kirrie J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-112
_version_ 1782243253071904768
author Murray, Elizabeth
McCabe, Patricia
Ballard, Kirrie J
author_facet Murray, Elizabeth
McCabe, Patricia
Ballard, Kirrie J
author_sort Murray, Elizabeth
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Childhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number of published single subject and case series studies of speech treatments are available. There are currently no randomised control trials or other well designed group trials available to guide clinical practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A parallel group, fixed size randomised control trial will be conducted in Sydney, Australia to determine the efficacy of two treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: 1) Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the 2) Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme – Third edition. Eligible children will be English speaking, aged 4–12 years with a diagnosis of suspected CAS, normal or adjusted hearing and vision, and no comprehension difficulties or other developmental diagnoses. At least 20 children will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments in parallel. Treatments will be delivered by trained and supervised speech pathology clinicians using operationalised manuals. Treatment will be administered in 1-hour sessions, 4 times per week for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes are speech sound and prosodic accuracy on a customised 292 item probe and the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology inconsistency subtest administered prior to treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months post-treatment. All post assessments will be completed by blinded assessors. Our hypotheses are: 1) treatment effects at 1 week post will be similar for both treatments, 2) maintenance of treatment effects at 1 and 4 months post will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment, and 3) generalisation of treatment effects to untrained related speech behaviours will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment. This protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney (#12924). DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomised control trial to test treatment for CAS. It will be valuable for clinical decision-making and providing evidence-based services for children with CAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000744853
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3441276
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34412762012-09-14 A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial Murray, Elizabeth McCabe, Patricia Ballard, Kirrie J BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: Childhood Apraxia of Speech is an impairment of speech motor planning that manifests as difficulty producing the sounds (articulation) and melody (prosody) of speech. These difficulties may persist through life and are detrimental to academic, social, and vocational development. A number of published single subject and case series studies of speech treatments are available. There are currently no randomised control trials or other well designed group trials available to guide clinical practice. METHODS/DESIGN: A parallel group, fixed size randomised control trial will be conducted in Sydney, Australia to determine the efficacy of two treatments for Childhood Apraxia of Speech: 1) Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment and the 2) Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme – Third edition. Eligible children will be English speaking, aged 4–12 years with a diagnosis of suspected CAS, normal or adjusted hearing and vision, and no comprehension difficulties or other developmental diagnoses. At least 20 children will be randomised to receive one of the two treatments in parallel. Treatments will be delivered by trained and supervised speech pathology clinicians using operationalised manuals. Treatment will be administered in 1-hour sessions, 4 times per week for 3 weeks. The primary outcomes are speech sound and prosodic accuracy on a customised 292 item probe and the Diagnostic Evaluation of Articulation and Phonology inconsistency subtest administered prior to treatment and 1 week, 1 month and 4 months post-treatment. All post assessments will be completed by blinded assessors. Our hypotheses are: 1) treatment effects at 1 week post will be similar for both treatments, 2) maintenance of treatment effects at 1 and 4 months post will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment, and 3) generalisation of treatment effects to untrained related speech behaviours will be greater for Rapid Syllable Transition Treatment than Nuffield Dyspraxia Programme treatment. This protocol was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee, University of Sydney (#12924). DISCUSSION: This will be the first randomised control trial to test treatment for CAS. It will be valuable for clinical decision-making and providing evidence-based services for children with CAS. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12612000744853 BioMed Central 2012-08-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3441276/ /pubmed/22863021 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-112 Text en Copyright ©2012 Murray et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Murray, Elizabeth
McCabe, Patricia
Ballard, Kirrie J
A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
title A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
title_full A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
title_fullStr A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
title_short A comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
title_sort comparison of two treatments for childhood apraxia of speech: methods and treatment protocol for a parallel group randomised control trial
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441276/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22863021
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-112
work_keys_str_mv AT murrayelizabeth acomparisonoftwotreatmentsforchildhoodapraxiaofspeechmethodsandtreatmentprotocolforaparallelgrouprandomisedcontroltrial
AT mccabepatricia acomparisonoftwotreatmentsforchildhoodapraxiaofspeechmethodsandtreatmentprotocolforaparallelgrouprandomisedcontroltrial
AT ballardkirriej acomparisonoftwotreatmentsforchildhoodapraxiaofspeechmethodsandtreatmentprotocolforaparallelgrouprandomisedcontroltrial
AT murrayelizabeth comparisonoftwotreatmentsforchildhoodapraxiaofspeechmethodsandtreatmentprotocolforaparallelgrouprandomisedcontroltrial
AT mccabepatricia comparisonoftwotreatmentsforchildhoodapraxiaofspeechmethodsandtreatmentprotocolforaparallelgrouprandomisedcontroltrial
AT ballardkirriej comparisonoftwotreatmentsforchildhoodapraxiaofspeechmethodsandtreatmentprotocolforaparallelgrouprandomisedcontroltrial