Cargando…

Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to document malaria case management practices in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised national malaria treatment protocol. The revised protocol stipulates routine testing of malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test or microscopy, anti-malarial prescr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pulford, Justin, Mueller, Ivo, Siba, Peter M, Hetzel, Manuel W
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22564504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-157
_version_ 1782243256118018048
author Pulford, Justin
Mueller, Ivo
Siba, Peter M
Hetzel, Manuel W
author_facet Pulford, Justin
Mueller, Ivo
Siba, Peter M
Hetzel, Manuel W
author_sort Pulford, Justin
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: This study aimed to document malaria case management practices in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised national malaria treatment protocol. The revised protocol stipulates routine testing of malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test or microscopy, anti-malarial prescription to test positive cases only, and the introduction of a new artemisinin-based first-line anti-malarial. Findings presented in this paper primarily focus on diagnostic, prescription and treatment counselling practices. METHODS: In a national cross-sectional survey of 79 randomly selected health facilities, data were collected via non-participant observation of the clinical case management of patients presenting with fever or a recent history of fever. Data were recorded on a structured clinical observation instrument. RESULTS: Overall, 15% of observed fever patients (n = 468) were tested for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test and a further 3.6% were tested via microscopy. An anti-malarial prescription was made in 96.4% (451/468) of cases, including 100% (17/17) of test positive cases and 82% (41/50) of test negative cases. In all, 79.8% of anti-malarial prescriptions conformed to the treatment protocol current at the time of data collection. The purpose of the prescribed medication was explained to patients in 63.4% of cases, dosage/regimen instructions were provided in 75.7% of cases and the possibility of adverse effects and what they might look like were discussed in only 1.1% of cases. CONCLUSION: The revised national malaria treatment protocol will require a substantial change in current clinical practice if it is to be correctly implemented and adhered to. Areas that will require the most change include the shift from presumptive to RDT/microscopy confirmed diagnosis, prescribing (or rather non-prescribing) of anti-malarials to patients who test negative for malaria infection, and the provision of thorough treatment counselling. A comprehensive clinician support programme, possibly inclusive of ‘booster’ training opportunities and regular clinical supervision will be needed to support the change.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3441287
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34412872012-09-14 Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol Pulford, Justin Mueller, Ivo Siba, Peter M Hetzel, Manuel W Malar J Research BACKGROUND: This study aimed to document malaria case management practices in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised national malaria treatment protocol. The revised protocol stipulates routine testing of malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test or microscopy, anti-malarial prescription to test positive cases only, and the introduction of a new artemisinin-based first-line anti-malarial. Findings presented in this paper primarily focus on diagnostic, prescription and treatment counselling practices. METHODS: In a national cross-sectional survey of 79 randomly selected health facilities, data were collected via non-participant observation of the clinical case management of patients presenting with fever or a recent history of fever. Data were recorded on a structured clinical observation instrument. RESULTS: Overall, 15% of observed fever patients (n = 468) were tested for malaria infection by rapid diagnostic test and a further 3.6% were tested via microscopy. An anti-malarial prescription was made in 96.4% (451/468) of cases, including 100% (17/17) of test positive cases and 82% (41/50) of test negative cases. In all, 79.8% of anti-malarial prescriptions conformed to the treatment protocol current at the time of data collection. The purpose of the prescribed medication was explained to patients in 63.4% of cases, dosage/regimen instructions were provided in 75.7% of cases and the possibility of adverse effects and what they might look like were discussed in only 1.1% of cases. CONCLUSION: The revised national malaria treatment protocol will require a substantial change in current clinical practice if it is to be correctly implemented and adhered to. Areas that will require the most change include the shift from presumptive to RDT/microscopy confirmed diagnosis, prescribing (or rather non-prescribing) of anti-malarials to patients who test negative for malaria infection, and the provision of thorough treatment counselling. A comprehensive clinician support programme, possibly inclusive of ‘booster’ training opportunities and regular clinical supervision will be needed to support the change. BioMed Central 2012-05-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3441287/ /pubmed/22564504 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-157 Text en Copyright ©2012 Pulford et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Pulford, Justin
Mueller, Ivo
Siba, Peter M
Hetzel, Manuel W
Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
title Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
title_full Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
title_fullStr Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
title_full_unstemmed Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
title_short Malaria case management in Papua New Guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
title_sort malaria case management in papua new guinea prior to the introduction of a revised treatment protocol
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441287/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22564504
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1475-2875-11-157
work_keys_str_mv AT pulfordjustin malariacasemanagementinpapuanewguineapriortotheintroductionofarevisedtreatmentprotocol
AT muellerivo malariacasemanagementinpapuanewguineapriortotheintroductionofarevisedtreatmentprotocol
AT sibapeterm malariacasemanagementinpapuanewguineapriortotheintroductionofarevisedtreatmentprotocol
AT hetzelmanuelw malariacasemanagementinpapuanewguineapriortotheintroductionofarevisedtreatmentprotocol