Cargando…

Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe

The technology of whole image acquisition from histological glass slides (Virtual slides, (VS)) and its associated software such as image storage, viewers, and virtual microscopy (VM), has matured in the recent years. There is an ongoing discussion whether to introduce VM into routine diagnostic sur...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Kayser, Klaus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22546238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-48
_version_ 1782243263806177280
author Kayser, Klaus
author_facet Kayser, Klaus
author_sort Kayser, Klaus
collection PubMed
description The technology of whole image acquisition from histological glass slides (Virtual slides, (VS)) and its associated software such as image storage, viewers, and virtual microscopy (VM), has matured in the recent years. There is an ongoing discussion whether to introduce VM into routine diagnostic surgical pathology (tissue-based diagnosis) or not, and if these are to be introduced how best to do this. The discussion also centres around how to substantially define the mandatory standards and working conditions related to introducing VM. This article briefly describes some hypotheses alongside our perspective and that of several of our European colleagues who have experienced VS and VM either in research or routine praxis. After consideration of the different opinions and published data the following statements can be derived: 1. Experiences from static and remote telepathology as well as from daily routine diagnoses, confirm that VM is a diagnostic tool that can be handled with the same diagnostic accuracy as conventional microscopy; at least no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) exist. 2. VM possesses several practical advantages in comparison to conventional microscopy; such as digital image storage and retrieval and contemporary display of multiple images (acquired from different stains, and/or different cases). 3. VM enables fast and efficient feedback between the pathologist and the laboratory in terms of ordered additional stains, automated access to the latest research for references, and fast consultation with outstanding telepathology experts. 4. Industry has already invested “big money” into this technology which certainly will be of influence in its future development. The main constraints against VM include the questionable reimbursement of the initial investment, the missing direct and short term financial benefit, and the loss of potential biological identity between the patient and the examined tissue. This article tries to analyze and evaluate the factors that influence the implementation of VM into routine tissue-based diagnosis, for example in combination with predictive diagnosis. It focuses on describing the advantages of modern and innovative electronically based communication technology. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1245603103708547
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3441330
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34413302012-09-14 Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe Kayser, Klaus Diagn Pathol Hypothesis The technology of whole image acquisition from histological glass slides (Virtual slides, (VS)) and its associated software such as image storage, viewers, and virtual microscopy (VM), has matured in the recent years. There is an ongoing discussion whether to introduce VM into routine diagnostic surgical pathology (tissue-based diagnosis) or not, and if these are to be introduced how best to do this. The discussion also centres around how to substantially define the mandatory standards and working conditions related to introducing VM. This article briefly describes some hypotheses alongside our perspective and that of several of our European colleagues who have experienced VS and VM either in research or routine praxis. After consideration of the different opinions and published data the following statements can be derived: 1. Experiences from static and remote telepathology as well as from daily routine diagnoses, confirm that VM is a diagnostic tool that can be handled with the same diagnostic accuracy as conventional microscopy; at least no statistically significant differences (p > 0.05) exist. 2. VM possesses several practical advantages in comparison to conventional microscopy; such as digital image storage and retrieval and contemporary display of multiple images (acquired from different stains, and/or different cases). 3. VM enables fast and efficient feedback between the pathologist and the laboratory in terms of ordered additional stains, automated access to the latest research for references, and fast consultation with outstanding telepathology experts. 4. Industry has already invested “big money” into this technology which certainly will be of influence in its future development. The main constraints against VM include the questionable reimbursement of the initial investment, the missing direct and short term financial benefit, and the loss of potential biological identity between the patient and the examined tissue. This article tries to analyze and evaluate the factors that influence the implementation of VM into routine tissue-based diagnosis, for example in combination with predictive diagnosis. It focuses on describing the advantages of modern and innovative electronically based communication technology. VIRTUAL SLIDES: The virtual slide(s) for this article can be found here: http://www.diagnosticpathology.diagnomx.eu/vs/1245603103708547 BioMed Central 2012-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3441330/ /pubmed/22546238 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-48 Text en Copyright ©2012 Kayser; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Hypothesis
Kayser, Klaus
Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe
title Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe
title_full Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe
title_fullStr Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe
title_full_unstemmed Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe
title_short Introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from Europe
title_sort introduction of virtual microscopy in routine surgical pathology - a hypothesis and personal view from europe
topic Hypothesis
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3441330/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22546238
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-1596-7-48
work_keys_str_mv AT kayserklaus introductionofvirtualmicroscopyinroutinesurgicalpathologyahypothesisandpersonalviewfromeurope