Cargando…

Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues

This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Barrett, Doug J. K., Krumbholz, Katrin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8
_version_ 1782243437239599104
author Barrett, Doug J. K.
Krumbholz, Katrin
author_facet Barrett, Doug J. K.
Krumbholz, Katrin
author_sort Barrett, Doug J. K.
collection PubMed
description This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation (±45°), and participants were asked to identify the target that had occurred first. In some of the trials, one of the targets was preceded by a short, non-predictive visual, auditory or audiovisual cue stimulus. The cue and target stimuli were presented at the exact same locations in space. The point of subjective simultaneity revealed a consistent spatiotemporal bias towards targets at the cued location. For the visual targets, the intramodal cue elicited the largest, and the crossmodal cue the smallest, bias. The bias elicited by the bimodal cue fell between the intramodal and crossmodal cue biases, with significant differences between all cue types. The pattern for the auditory targets was similar apart from a scaling factor and greater variance, so the differences between the cue conditions did not reach significance. These results provide evidence for multisensory integration in exogenous attentional cueing. The magnitude of the bimodal cueing effect was equivalent to the average of the facilitation elicited by the intramodal and crossmodal cues. Under the assumption that the visual and auditory cues were equally informative, this is consistent with the notion that exogenous attention, like perception, integrates multimodal information in an optimal way.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3442165
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34421652012-09-18 Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues Barrett, Doug J. K. Krumbholz, Katrin Exp Brain Res Research Article This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation (±45°), and participants were asked to identify the target that had occurred first. In some of the trials, one of the targets was preceded by a short, non-predictive visual, auditory or audiovisual cue stimulus. The cue and target stimuli were presented at the exact same locations in space. The point of subjective simultaneity revealed a consistent spatiotemporal bias towards targets at the cued location. For the visual targets, the intramodal cue elicited the largest, and the crossmodal cue the smallest, bias. The bias elicited by the bimodal cue fell between the intramodal and crossmodal cue biases, with significant differences between all cue types. The pattern for the auditory targets was similar apart from a scaling factor and greater variance, so the differences between the cue conditions did not reach significance. These results provide evidence for multisensory integration in exogenous attentional cueing. The magnitude of the bimodal cueing effect was equivalent to the average of the facilitation elicited by the intramodal and crossmodal cues. Under the assumption that the visual and auditory cues were equally informative, this is consistent with the notion that exogenous attention, like perception, integrates multimodal information in an optimal way. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-28 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3442165/ /pubmed/22975896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Barrett, Doug J. K.
Krumbholz, Katrin
Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
title Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
title_full Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
title_fullStr Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
title_full_unstemmed Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
title_short Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
title_sort evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442165/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975896
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8
work_keys_str_mv AT barrettdougjk evidenceformultisensoryintegrationintheelicitationofpriorentrybybimodalcues
AT krumbholzkatrin evidenceformultisensoryintegrationintheelicitationofpriorentrybybimodalcues