Cargando…
Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues
This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer-Verlag
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8 |
_version_ | 1782243437239599104 |
---|---|
author | Barrett, Doug J. K. Krumbholz, Katrin |
author_facet | Barrett, Doug J. K. Krumbholz, Katrin |
author_sort | Barrett, Doug J. K. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation (±45°), and participants were asked to identify the target that had occurred first. In some of the trials, one of the targets was preceded by a short, non-predictive visual, auditory or audiovisual cue stimulus. The cue and target stimuli were presented at the exact same locations in space. The point of subjective simultaneity revealed a consistent spatiotemporal bias towards targets at the cued location. For the visual targets, the intramodal cue elicited the largest, and the crossmodal cue the smallest, bias. The bias elicited by the bimodal cue fell between the intramodal and crossmodal cue biases, with significant differences between all cue types. The pattern for the auditory targets was similar apart from a scaling factor and greater variance, so the differences between the cue conditions did not reach significance. These results provide evidence for multisensory integration in exogenous attentional cueing. The magnitude of the bimodal cueing effect was equivalent to the average of the facilitation elicited by the intramodal and crossmodal cues. Under the assumption that the visual and auditory cues were equally informative, this is consistent with the notion that exogenous attention, like perception, integrates multimodal information in an optimal way. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3442165 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Springer-Verlag |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34421652012-09-18 Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues Barrett, Doug J. K. Krumbholz, Katrin Exp Brain Res Research Article This study reports an experiment investigating the relative effects of intramodal, crossmodal and bimodal cues on visual and auditory temporal order judgements. Pairs of visual or auditory targets, separated by varying stimulus onset asynchronies, were presented to either side of a central fixation (±45°), and participants were asked to identify the target that had occurred first. In some of the trials, one of the targets was preceded by a short, non-predictive visual, auditory or audiovisual cue stimulus. The cue and target stimuli were presented at the exact same locations in space. The point of subjective simultaneity revealed a consistent spatiotemporal bias towards targets at the cued location. For the visual targets, the intramodal cue elicited the largest, and the crossmodal cue the smallest, bias. The bias elicited by the bimodal cue fell between the intramodal and crossmodal cue biases, with significant differences between all cue types. The pattern for the auditory targets was similar apart from a scaling factor and greater variance, so the differences between the cue conditions did not reach significance. These results provide evidence for multisensory integration in exogenous attentional cueing. The magnitude of the bimodal cueing effect was equivalent to the average of the facilitation elicited by the intramodal and crossmodal cues. Under the assumption that the visual and auditory cues were equally informative, this is consistent with the notion that exogenous attention, like perception, integrates multimodal information in an optimal way. Springer-Verlag 2012-07-28 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3442165/ /pubmed/22975896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2012 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Barrett, Doug J. K. Krumbholz, Katrin Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
title | Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
title_full | Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
title_fullStr | Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
title_full_unstemmed | Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
title_short | Evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
title_sort | evidence for multisensory integration in the elicitation of prior entry by bimodal cues |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442165/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22975896 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-012-3191-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT barrettdougjk evidenceformultisensoryintegrationintheelicitationofpriorentrybybimodalcues AT krumbholzkatrin evidenceformultisensoryintegrationintheelicitationofpriorentrybybimodalcues |