Cargando…

Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosa, Nicola, De Bernardo, Maddalena, Romano, Mario R, Scarfato, Gianluca, Verdoliva, Francesco, Mastropasqua, Rodolfo, Lanza, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824597
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707
Descripción
Sumario:AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the “cross-cylinder” technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from –0.75 D to –3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from –3.25 D to –6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of –1.90 ± 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 ± 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 ± 0.75 D (range +2.5 to –2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 ± 0.51 D (range +2.5 to –1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 ± 0.81 D (range +1.75 to –2 D). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism.