Cargando…

Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation

AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) usin...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rosa, Nicola, De Bernardo, Maddalena, Romano, Mario R, Scarfato, Gianluca, Verdoliva, Francesco, Mastropasqua, Rodolfo, Lanza, Michele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824597
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707
_version_ 1782243466609164288
author Rosa, Nicola
De Bernardo, Maddalena
Romano, Mario R
Scarfato, Gianluca
Verdoliva, Francesco
Mastropasqua, Rodolfo
Lanza, Michele
author_facet Rosa, Nicola
De Bernardo, Maddalena
Romano, Mario R
Scarfato, Gianluca
Verdoliva, Francesco
Mastropasqua, Rodolfo
Lanza, Michele
author_sort Rosa, Nicola
collection PubMed
description AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the “cross-cylinder” technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from –0.75 D to –3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from –3.25 D to –6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of –1.90 ± 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 ± 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 ± 0.75 D (range +2.5 to –2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 ± 0.51 D (range +2.5 to –1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 ± 0.81 D (range +1.75 to –2 D). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3442463
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34424632012-09-25 Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Romano, Mario R Scarfato, Gianluca Verdoliva, Francesco Mastropasqua, Rodolfo Lanza, Michele Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the “cross-cylinder” technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from –0.75 D to –3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from –3.25 D to –6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of –1.90 ± 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 ± 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 ± 0.75 D (range +2.5 to –2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 ± 0.51 D (range +2.5 to –1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 ± 0.81 D (range +1.75 to –2 D). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3442463/ /pubmed/22824597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Rosa, Nicola
De Bernardo, Maddalena
Romano, Mario R
Scarfato, Gianluca
Verdoliva, Francesco
Mastropasqua, Rodolfo
Lanza, Michele
Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
title Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
title_full Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
title_fullStr Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
title_full_unstemmed Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
title_short Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
title_sort analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442463/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824597
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707
work_keys_str_mv AT rosanicola analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation
AT debernardomaddalena analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation
AT romanomarior analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation
AT scarfatogianluca analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation
AT verdolivafrancesco analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation
AT mastropasquarodolfo analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation
AT lanzamichele analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation