Cargando…
Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation
AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) usin...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707 |
_version_ | 1782243466609164288 |
---|---|
author | Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Romano, Mario R Scarfato, Gianluca Verdoliva, Francesco Mastropasqua, Rodolfo Lanza, Michele |
author_facet | Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Romano, Mario R Scarfato, Gianluca Verdoliva, Francesco Mastropasqua, Rodolfo Lanza, Michele |
author_sort | Rosa, Nicola |
collection | PubMed |
description | AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the “cross-cylinder” technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from –0.75 D to –3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from –3.25 D to –6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of –1.90 ± 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 ± 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 ± 0.75 D (range +2.5 to –2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 ± 0.51 D (range +2.5 to –1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 ± 0.81 D (range +1.75 to –2 D). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3442463 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34424632012-09-25 Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Romano, Mario R Scarfato, Gianluca Verdoliva, Francesco Mastropasqua, Rodolfo Lanza, Michele Indian J Ophthalmol Original Article AIM: The aim was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of the “cross-cylinder” technique in the correction of astigmatism. SETTING AND DESIGN: A prospective interventional study from a university eye department was conducted. MATERIAL AND METHODS: The photoastigmatic refractive keratectomy (PARK) using the “cross-cylinder” technique was performed in 102 eyes of 84 patients with at least 0.75 D of astigmatism. The study population was divided into two groups: in the first group the preoperative astigmatic power ranged from –0.75 D to –3.00 D (group 1), in the second group it ranged from –3.25 D to –6.00 D (group 2). Group 1 included 82 eyes of 67 patients (29 males and 38 females) with a mean cylinder power of –1.90 ± 0.63 D, group 2 included 20 eyes of 17 patients (13 males and 4 females) with a mean cylinder power of -4.28 ± 0.76 D. All eyes were targeted for emmetropia. The results were evaluated using Calossi's vector analysis method. Six-month postoperative outcomes are presented. RESULTS: Six months after PARK the mean sphere for the entire cohort was +0.28 ± 0.75 D (range +2.5 to –2 D), the mean cylindrical power was +0.33 ± 0.51 D (range +2.5 to –1.25 D) and the mean spherical equivalent refraction was +0.73 ± 0.81 D (range +1.75 to –2 D). CONCLUSIONS: The cross-cylinder technique may be safely used with predictable results for the correction of astigmatism. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3442463/ /pubmed/22824597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707 Text en Copyright: © Indian Journal of Ophthalmology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Rosa, Nicola De Bernardo, Maddalena Romano, Mario R Scarfato, Gianluca Verdoliva, Francesco Mastropasqua, Rodolfo Lanza, Michele Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
title | Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
title_full | Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
title_fullStr | Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
title_short | Analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
title_sort | analysis of photoastigmatic keratectomy with the cross-cylinder ablation |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3442463/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22824597 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0301-4738.98707 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rosanicola analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation AT debernardomaddalena analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation AT romanomarior analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation AT scarfatogianluca analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation AT verdolivafrancesco analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation AT mastropasquarodolfo analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation AT lanzamichele analysisofphotoastigmatickeratectomywiththecrosscylinderablation |