Cargando…
Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review
Implementation Science has been published for six years and over that time has gone from receiving 100 articles in 2006 to receiving 354 in 2011; our impact factor has risen from 2.49 in June 2010 to 3.10 in June 2012. Whilst our article publication rate has also risen, it has risen much less slowly...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22839967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-71 |
_version_ | 1782243514765017088 |
---|---|
author | Eccles, Martin P Foy, Robbie Sales, Anne Wensing, Michel Mittman, Brian |
author_facet | Eccles, Martin P Foy, Robbie Sales, Anne Wensing, Michel Mittman, Brian |
author_sort | Eccles, Martin P |
collection | PubMed |
description | Implementation Science has been published for six years and over that time has gone from receiving 100 articles in 2006 to receiving 354 in 2011; our impact factor has risen from 2.49 in June 2010 to 3.10 in June 2012. Whilst our article publication rate has also risen, it has risen much less slowly than our submission rate—we published 29 papers in 2006 and 134 papers in 2011 and we now publish only around 40 % of submissions. About one-half of submitted manuscripts are rejected without being sent out for peer review; it has become clear that there are a number of common issues that result in manuscripts being rejected at this stage. We hope that by publishing this editorial on our common reasons for rejection without peer review we can help authors to better judge the relevance of their papers to Implementation Science. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3443070 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34430702012-09-15 Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review Eccles, Martin P Foy, Robbie Sales, Anne Wensing, Michel Mittman, Brian Implement Sci Editorial Implementation Science has been published for six years and over that time has gone from receiving 100 articles in 2006 to receiving 354 in 2011; our impact factor has risen from 2.49 in June 2010 to 3.10 in June 2012. Whilst our article publication rate has also risen, it has risen much less slowly than our submission rate—we published 29 papers in 2006 and 134 papers in 2011 and we now publish only around 40 % of submissions. About one-half of submitted manuscripts are rejected without being sent out for peer review; it has become clear that there are a number of common issues that result in manuscripts being rejected at this stage. We hope that by publishing this editorial on our common reasons for rejection without peer review we can help authors to better judge the relevance of their papers to Implementation Science. BioMed Central 2012-07-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3443070/ /pubmed/22839967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-71 Text en Copyright ©2012 Eccles et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Editorial Eccles, Martin P Foy, Robbie Sales, Anne Wensing, Michel Mittman, Brian Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
title | Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
title_full | Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
title_fullStr | Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
title_full_unstemmed | Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
title_short | Implementation Science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
title_sort | implementation science six years on—our evolving scope and common reasons for rejection without review |
topic | Editorial |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443070/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22839967 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1748-5908-7-71 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ecclesmartinp implementationsciencesixyearsonourevolvingscopeandcommonreasonsforrejectionwithoutreview AT foyrobbie implementationsciencesixyearsonourevolvingscopeandcommonreasonsforrejectionwithoutreview AT salesanne implementationsciencesixyearsonourevolvingscopeandcommonreasonsforrejectionwithoutreview AT wensingmichel implementationsciencesixyearsonourevolvingscopeandcommonreasonsforrejectionwithoutreview AT mittmanbrian implementationsciencesixyearsonourevolvingscopeandcommonreasonsforrejectionwithoutreview |