Cargando…

Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years

The hypotheses tested were: survival rate of fully and partially retained glass-carbomer sealants is higher than those of high-viscosity glass-ionomer, with and without energy supplied, and that of resin composite; survival rate of fully and partially retained sealants of high-viscosity glass-ionome...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chen, Xi, Du, Minquan, Fan, Mingwen, Mulder, Jan, Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte, Frencken, Jo E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer-Verlag 2011
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22124610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0633-9
_version_ 1782243545323667456
author Chen, Xi
Du, Minquan
Fan, Mingwen
Mulder, Jan
Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte
Frencken, Jo E.
author_facet Chen, Xi
Du, Minquan
Fan, Mingwen
Mulder, Jan
Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte
Frencken, Jo E.
author_sort Chen, Xi
collection PubMed
description The hypotheses tested were: survival rate of fully and partially retained glass-carbomer sealants is higher than those of high-viscosity glass-ionomer, with and without energy supplied, and that of resin composite; survival rate of fully and partially retained sealants of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with energy supplied is higher than those without energy supplied. The randomized clinical trial covered 407 children, with a mean age of 8 years. The evaluation took place after 0.5, 1 and 2 years. Survival of sealant material in occlusal and in smooth surfaces, using the traditional categorization (fully and partially retained versus completely lost sealants) and the modified categorization (fully and more than 2/3 of the sealant retained versus completely lost sealants), were dependent variables. The Kaplan–Meier survival method was used. According to both categorizations of partially retained sealants, the survival of completely and partially retained resin composite sealants in occlusal and in smooth tooth surfaces was statistically significantly higher, and those of glass-carbomer sealants lower, than those of sealants of the other three groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates of completely and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants with and without energy supplied in occlusal and in smooth surfaces. After 2 years, glass-carbomer sealant retention was the poorest, adding energy to high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealant did not increase the retention rate and resin composite sealants were retained the longest. We suggest the use of the modified categorization of partially retained sealants in future studies. It seems not necessary to cure high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants. The use of glass-carbomer sealants cannot be recommended yet. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0633-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3443351
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2011
publisher Springer-Verlag
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34433512012-09-20 Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years Chen, Xi Du, Minquan Fan, Mingwen Mulder, Jan Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte Frencken, Jo E. Clin Oral Investig Original Article The hypotheses tested were: survival rate of fully and partially retained glass-carbomer sealants is higher than those of high-viscosity glass-ionomer, with and without energy supplied, and that of resin composite; survival rate of fully and partially retained sealants of high-viscosity glass-ionomer with energy supplied is higher than those without energy supplied. The randomized clinical trial covered 407 children, with a mean age of 8 years. The evaluation took place after 0.5, 1 and 2 years. Survival of sealant material in occlusal and in smooth surfaces, using the traditional categorization (fully and partially retained versus completely lost sealants) and the modified categorization (fully and more than 2/3 of the sealant retained versus completely lost sealants), were dependent variables. The Kaplan–Meier survival method was used. According to both categorizations of partially retained sealants, the survival of completely and partially retained resin composite sealants in occlusal and in smooth tooth surfaces was statistically significantly higher, and those of glass-carbomer sealants lower, than those of sealants of the other three groups. There was no statistically significant difference in the survival rates of completely and partially retained high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants with and without energy supplied in occlusal and in smooth surfaces. After 2 years, glass-carbomer sealant retention was the poorest, adding energy to high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealant did not increase the retention rate and resin composite sealants were retained the longest. We suggest the use of the modified categorization of partially retained sealants in future studies. It seems not necessary to cure high-viscosity glass-ionomer sealants. The use of glass-carbomer sealants cannot be recommended yet. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (doi:10.1007/s00784-011-0633-9) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer-Verlag 2011-11-29 2012 /pmc/articles/PMC3443351/ /pubmed/22124610 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0633-9 Text en © The Author(s) 2011 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chen, Xi
Du, Minquan
Fan, Mingwen
Mulder, Jan
Huysmans, Marie-Charlotte
Frencken, Jo E.
Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
title Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
title_full Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
title_fullStr Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
title_full_unstemmed Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
title_short Effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
title_sort effectiveness of two new types of sealants: retention after 2 years
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443351/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22124610
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00784-011-0633-9
work_keys_str_mv AT chenxi effectivenessoftwonewtypesofsealantsretentionafter2years
AT duminquan effectivenessoftwonewtypesofsealantsretentionafter2years
AT fanmingwen effectivenessoftwonewtypesofsealantsretentionafter2years
AT mulderjan effectivenessoftwonewtypesofsealantsretentionafter2years
AT huysmansmariecharlotte effectivenessoftwonewtypesofsealantsretentionafter2years
AT frenckenjoe effectivenessoftwonewtypesofsealantsretentionafter2years