Cargando…

Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study

Clinical scores represent the gold standard in characterizing the clinical condition of patients in vegetative or minimally conscious state. However, they suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, subjectivity and inter-rater reliability. In this feasibility study, objective measures includi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wieser, Martin, Buetler, Lilith, Vallery, Heike, Schaller, Judith, Mayr, Andreas, Kofler, Markus, Saltuari, Leopold, Zutter, Daniel, Riener, Robert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-30
_version_ 1782243560008974336
author Wieser, Martin
Buetler, Lilith
Vallery, Heike
Schaller, Judith
Mayr, Andreas
Kofler, Markus
Saltuari, Leopold
Zutter, Daniel
Riener, Robert
author_facet Wieser, Martin
Buetler, Lilith
Vallery, Heike
Schaller, Judith
Mayr, Andreas
Kofler, Markus
Saltuari, Leopold
Zutter, Daniel
Riener, Robert
author_sort Wieser, Martin
collection PubMed
description Clinical scores represent the gold standard in characterizing the clinical condition of patients in vegetative or minimally conscious state. However, they suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, subjectivity and inter-rater reliability. In this feasibility study, objective measures including physiological and neurophysiological signals are used to quantify the clinical state of 13 low-responsive patients. A linear regression method was applied in nine patients to obtain fixed regression coefficients for the description of the clinical state. The statistical model was extended and evaluated with four patients of another hospital. A linear mixed models approach was introduced to handle the challenges of data sets obtained from different locations. Using linear backward regression 12 variables were sufficient to explain 74.4% of the variability in the change of the clinical scores. Variables based on event-related potentials and electrocardiogram account for most of the variability. These preliminary results are promising considering that this is the first attempt to describe the clinical state of low-responsive patients in such a global and quantitative way. This new model could complement the clinical scores based on objective measurements in order to increase diagnostic reliability. Nevertheless, more patients are necessary to prove the conclusions of a statistical model with 12 variables.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3443429
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34434292012-09-18 Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study Wieser, Martin Buetler, Lilith Vallery, Heike Schaller, Judith Mayr, Andreas Kofler, Markus Saltuari, Leopold Zutter, Daniel Riener, Robert J Neuroeng Rehabil Methodology Clinical scores represent the gold standard in characterizing the clinical condition of patients in vegetative or minimally conscious state. However, they suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, subjectivity and inter-rater reliability. In this feasibility study, objective measures including physiological and neurophysiological signals are used to quantify the clinical state of 13 low-responsive patients. A linear regression method was applied in nine patients to obtain fixed regression coefficients for the description of the clinical state. The statistical model was extended and evaluated with four patients of another hospital. A linear mixed models approach was introduced to handle the challenges of data sets obtained from different locations. Using linear backward regression 12 variables were sufficient to explain 74.4% of the variability in the change of the clinical scores. Variables based on event-related potentials and electrocardiogram account for most of the variability. These preliminary results are promising considering that this is the first attempt to describe the clinical state of low-responsive patients in such a global and quantitative way. This new model could complement the clinical scores based on objective measurements in order to increase diagnostic reliability. Nevertheless, more patients are necessary to prove the conclusions of a statistical model with 12 variables. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3443429/ /pubmed/22647145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-30 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wieser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Methodology
Wieser, Martin
Buetler, Lilith
Vallery, Heike
Schaller, Judith
Mayr, Andreas
Kofler, Markus
Saltuari, Leopold
Zutter, Daniel
Riener, Robert
Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
title Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
title_full Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
title_fullStr Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
title_full_unstemmed Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
title_short Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
title_sort quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
topic Methodology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443429/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647145
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-30
work_keys_str_mv AT wiesermartin quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT buetlerlilith quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT valleryheike quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT schallerjudith quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT mayrandreas quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT koflermarkus quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT saltuarileopold quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT zutterdaniel quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy
AT rienerrobert quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy