Cargando…
Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study
Clinical scores represent the gold standard in characterizing the clinical condition of patients in vegetative or minimally conscious state. However, they suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, subjectivity and inter-rater reliability. In this feasibility study, objective measures includi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-30 |
_version_ | 1782243560008974336 |
---|---|
author | Wieser, Martin Buetler, Lilith Vallery, Heike Schaller, Judith Mayr, Andreas Kofler, Markus Saltuari, Leopold Zutter, Daniel Riener, Robert |
author_facet | Wieser, Martin Buetler, Lilith Vallery, Heike Schaller, Judith Mayr, Andreas Kofler, Markus Saltuari, Leopold Zutter, Daniel Riener, Robert |
author_sort | Wieser, Martin |
collection | PubMed |
description | Clinical scores represent the gold standard in characterizing the clinical condition of patients in vegetative or minimally conscious state. However, they suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, subjectivity and inter-rater reliability. In this feasibility study, objective measures including physiological and neurophysiological signals are used to quantify the clinical state of 13 low-responsive patients. A linear regression method was applied in nine patients to obtain fixed regression coefficients for the description of the clinical state. The statistical model was extended and evaluated with four patients of another hospital. A linear mixed models approach was introduced to handle the challenges of data sets obtained from different locations. Using linear backward regression 12 variables were sufficient to explain 74.4% of the variability in the change of the clinical scores. Variables based on event-related potentials and electrocardiogram account for most of the variability. These preliminary results are promising considering that this is the first attempt to describe the clinical state of low-responsive patients in such a global and quantitative way. This new model could complement the clinical scores based on objective measurements in order to increase diagnostic reliability. Nevertheless, more patients are necessary to prove the conclusions of a statistical model with 12 variables. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3443429 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34434292012-09-18 Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study Wieser, Martin Buetler, Lilith Vallery, Heike Schaller, Judith Mayr, Andreas Kofler, Markus Saltuari, Leopold Zutter, Daniel Riener, Robert J Neuroeng Rehabil Methodology Clinical scores represent the gold standard in characterizing the clinical condition of patients in vegetative or minimally conscious state. However, they suffer from problems of sensitivity, specificity, subjectivity and inter-rater reliability. In this feasibility study, objective measures including physiological and neurophysiological signals are used to quantify the clinical state of 13 low-responsive patients. A linear regression method was applied in nine patients to obtain fixed regression coefficients for the description of the clinical state. The statistical model was extended and evaluated with four patients of another hospital. A linear mixed models approach was introduced to handle the challenges of data sets obtained from different locations. Using linear backward regression 12 variables were sufficient to explain 74.4% of the variability in the change of the clinical scores. Variables based on event-related potentials and electrocardiogram account for most of the variability. These preliminary results are promising considering that this is the first attempt to describe the clinical state of low-responsive patients in such a global and quantitative way. This new model could complement the clinical scores based on objective measurements in order to increase diagnostic reliability. Nevertheless, more patients are necessary to prove the conclusions of a statistical model with 12 variables. BioMed Central 2012-05-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3443429/ /pubmed/22647145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-30 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wieser et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Methodology Wieser, Martin Buetler, Lilith Vallery, Heike Schaller, Judith Mayr, Andreas Kofler, Markus Saltuari, Leopold Zutter, Daniel Riener, Robert Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
title | Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
title_full | Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
title_fullStr | Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
title_full_unstemmed | Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
title_short | Quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
title_sort | quantification of clinical scores through physiological recordings in low-responsive patients: a feasibility study |
topic | Methodology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3443429/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22647145 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1743-0003-9-30 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wiesermartin quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT buetlerlilith quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT valleryheike quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT schallerjudith quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT mayrandreas quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT koflermarkus quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT saltuarileopold quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT zutterdaniel quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy AT rienerrobert quantificationofclinicalscoresthroughphysiologicalrecordingsinlowresponsivepatientsafeasibilitystudy |