Cargando…
Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner
Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23012532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120709046 |
_version_ | 1782243631645589504 |
---|---|
author | Polo, María-Eugenia Felicísimo, Ángel M. |
author_facet | Polo, María-Eugenia Felicísimo, Ángel M. |
author_sort | Polo, María-Eugenia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs an analysis of the uncertainty and repeatability of the NextEngine™ portable low-cost 3D laser scanner by scanning an object 20 times in two different resolution modes—Macro and Wide. Some dimensions of the object were measured using a digital calliper, and these results were used as the “true” or control data. In comparing the true and the scanned data, we verified that the mean uncertainty in the Macro Mode is approximately half that of the Wide Mode, at ±0.81 mm and ±1.66 mm, respectively. These experimental results are significantly higher than the accuracy specifications provided by the manufacturer. An analysis of repeatability shows that the successive replicates do not match in the same position. The results are better in Macro Mode than in Wide Mode; it is observed that the repeatability factor is slightly larger than the corresponding mode accuracy, with ±0.84 vs. ±0.81 mm in Macro Mode and ±1.82 vs. ±1.66 mm in Wide Mode. We suggest several improvements, such as adding an external reference scale or providing a calibrated object to allow for a self-calibration operation of the scanner. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3444090 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34440902012-09-25 Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner Polo, María-Eugenia Felicísimo, Ángel M. Sensors (Basel) Article Portable 3D laser scanners are a valuable tool for compiling elaborate digital collections of archaeological objects and analysing the shapes and dimensions of pieces. Although low-cost desktop 3D laser scanners have powerful capacities, it is important to know their limitations. This paper performs an analysis of the uncertainty and repeatability of the NextEngine™ portable low-cost 3D laser scanner by scanning an object 20 times in two different resolution modes—Macro and Wide. Some dimensions of the object were measured using a digital calliper, and these results were used as the “true” or control data. In comparing the true and the scanned data, we verified that the mean uncertainty in the Macro Mode is approximately half that of the Wide Mode, at ±0.81 mm and ±1.66 mm, respectively. These experimental results are significantly higher than the accuracy specifications provided by the manufacturer. An analysis of repeatability shows that the successive replicates do not match in the same position. The results are better in Macro Mode than in Wide Mode; it is observed that the repeatability factor is slightly larger than the corresponding mode accuracy, with ±0.84 vs. ±0.81 mm in Macro Mode and ±1.82 vs. ±1.66 mm in Wide Mode. We suggest several improvements, such as adding an external reference scale or providing a calibrated object to allow for a self-calibration operation of the scanner. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2012-07-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3444090/ /pubmed/23012532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120709046 Text en © 2012 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Polo, María-Eugenia Felicísimo, Ángel M. Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title | Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_full | Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_fullStr | Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_full_unstemmed | Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_short | Analysis of Uncertainty and Repeatability of a Low-Cost 3D Laser Scanner |
title_sort | analysis of uncertainty and repeatability of a low-cost 3d laser scanner |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444090/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23012532 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s120709046 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT polomariaeugenia analysisofuncertaintyandrepeatabilityofalowcost3dlaserscanner AT felicisimoangelm analysisofuncertaintyandrepeatabilityofalowcost3dlaserscanner |