Cargando…

Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal

The nosology, classification and pathophysiology of ophthalmoplegic migraine (OM) remains complex and debatable. A recently proposed classification of OM leaves several caveats. A critical analysis of all reported cases of OM (1993–2010) has been made incorporating the authors’ own experience to arr...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chakravarty, Ambar, Mukherjee, Angshuman
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024560
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.99985
_version_ 1782243644587114496
author Chakravarty, Ambar
Mukherjee, Angshuman
author_facet Chakravarty, Ambar
Mukherjee, Angshuman
author_sort Chakravarty, Ambar
collection PubMed
description The nosology, classification and pathophysiology of ophthalmoplegic migraine (OM) remains complex and debatable. A recently proposed classification of OM leaves several caveats. A critical analysis of all reported cases of OM (1993–2010) has been made incorporating the authors’ own experience to arrive at a simple, unambiguous and easy to use diagnostic criteria and classification of OM. Between 2005 and 2010, 18 adult cases of OM had been seen whose clinical details are summarized. Most had sixth nerve palsies associated with migraine-like headaches lasting more than 4 days. Other possibilities were carefully excluded. All subjects responded to corticosteroids favorably. We prefer using the term ophthalmoplegia with migraine-like headache (OMLH) rather than OM. We classify OMLH as a migraine subtype (1.7) and into two groups—childhood-onset type (where third nerve palsies and nerve enhancement are common) and adult-onset type (where sixth nerve palsies are more common and nerve enhancement unusual). This clinico-radiological classification does not in any way hint at any difference in pathophysiology between the two groups.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3444213
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34442132012-09-28 Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal Chakravarty, Ambar Mukherjee, Angshuman Ann Indian Acad Neurol View Point The nosology, classification and pathophysiology of ophthalmoplegic migraine (OM) remains complex and debatable. A recently proposed classification of OM leaves several caveats. A critical analysis of all reported cases of OM (1993–2010) has been made incorporating the authors’ own experience to arrive at a simple, unambiguous and easy to use diagnostic criteria and classification of OM. Between 2005 and 2010, 18 adult cases of OM had been seen whose clinical details are summarized. Most had sixth nerve palsies associated with migraine-like headaches lasting more than 4 days. Other possibilities were carefully excluded. All subjects responded to corticosteroids favorably. We prefer using the term ophthalmoplegia with migraine-like headache (OMLH) rather than OM. We classify OMLH as a migraine subtype (1.7) and into two groups—childhood-onset type (where third nerve palsies and nerve enhancement are common) and adult-onset type (where sixth nerve palsies are more common and nerve enhancement unusual). This clinico-radiological classification does not in any way hint at any difference in pathophysiology between the two groups. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2012-08 /pmc/articles/PMC3444213/ /pubmed/23024560 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.99985 Text en Copyright: © Annals of Indian Academy of Neurology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle View Point
Chakravarty, Ambar
Mukherjee, Angshuman
Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal
title Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal
title_full Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal
title_fullStr Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal
title_full_unstemmed Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal
title_short Ophthalmoplegic migraine: A critical analysis and a new proposal
title_sort ophthalmoplegic migraine: a critical analysis and a new proposal
topic View Point
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444213/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23024560
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/0972-2327.99985
work_keys_str_mv AT chakravartyambar ophthalmoplegicmigraineacriticalanalysisandanewproposal
AT mukherjeeangshuman ophthalmoplegicmigraineacriticalanalysisandanewproposal