Cargando…

Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study

BACKGROUND: It is well established that considering users is an important aspect of medical device development. However it is also well established that there are numerous barriers to successfully conducting user research and integrating the results into product development. It is not sufficient to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Martin, Jennifer L, Barnett, Julie
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22812565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-74
_version_ 1782243666849431552
author Martin, Jennifer L
Barnett, Julie
author_facet Martin, Jennifer L
Barnett, Julie
author_sort Martin, Jennifer L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It is well established that considering users is an important aspect of medical device development. However it is also well established that there are numerous barriers to successfully conducting user research and integrating the results into product development. It is not sufficient to simply conduct user research, it must also be effectively integrated into product development. METHODS: A case study of the development of a new medical imaging device was conducted to examine in detail how users were involved in a medical device development project. Two user research studies were conducted: a requirements elicitation interview study and an early prototype evaluation using contextual inquiry. A descriptive in situ approach was taken to investigate how these studies contributed to the product development process and how the results of this work influenced the development of the technology. Data was collected qualitatively through interviews with the development team, participant observation at development meetings and document analysis. The focus was on investigating the barriers that exist to prevent user data from being integrated into product development. RESULTS: A number of individual, organisational and system barriers were identified that functioned to prevent the results of the user research being fully integrated into development. The user and technological aspects of development were seen as separate work streams during development. The expectations of the developers were that user research would collect requirements for the appearance of the device, rather than challenge its fundamental concept. The manner that the user data was communicated to the development team was not effective in conveying the significance or breadth of the findings. CONCLUSION: There are a range of informal and formal organisational processes that can affect the uptake of user data during medical device development. Adopting formal decision making processes may assist manufacturers to take a more integrated and reflective approach to development, which should result in improved business decisions and a higher quality end product.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3444354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34443542012-09-18 Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study Martin, Jennifer L Barnett, Julie BMC Med Inform Decis Mak Research Article BACKGROUND: It is well established that considering users is an important aspect of medical device development. However it is also well established that there are numerous barriers to successfully conducting user research and integrating the results into product development. It is not sufficient to simply conduct user research, it must also be effectively integrated into product development. METHODS: A case study of the development of a new medical imaging device was conducted to examine in detail how users were involved in a medical device development project. Two user research studies were conducted: a requirements elicitation interview study and an early prototype evaluation using contextual inquiry. A descriptive in situ approach was taken to investigate how these studies contributed to the product development process and how the results of this work influenced the development of the technology. Data was collected qualitatively through interviews with the development team, participant observation at development meetings and document analysis. The focus was on investigating the barriers that exist to prevent user data from being integrated into product development. RESULTS: A number of individual, organisational and system barriers were identified that functioned to prevent the results of the user research being fully integrated into development. The user and technological aspects of development were seen as separate work streams during development. The expectations of the developers were that user research would collect requirements for the appearance of the device, rather than challenge its fundamental concept. The manner that the user data was communicated to the development team was not effective in conveying the significance or breadth of the findings. CONCLUSION: There are a range of informal and formal organisational processes that can affect the uptake of user data during medical device development. Adopting formal decision making processes may assist manufacturers to take a more integrated and reflective approach to development, which should result in improved business decisions and a higher quality end product. BioMed Central 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3444354/ /pubmed/22812565 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-74 Text en Copyright ©2012 Martin and Barnett; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Martin, Jennifer L
Barnett, Julie
Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
title Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
title_full Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
title_fullStr Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
title_full_unstemmed Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
title_short Integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
title_sort integrating the results of user research into medical device development: insights from a case study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22812565
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1472-6947-12-74
work_keys_str_mv AT martinjenniferl integratingtheresultsofuserresearchintomedicaldevicedevelopmentinsightsfromacasestudy
AT barnettjulie integratingtheresultsofuserresearchintomedicaldevicedevelopmentinsightsfromacasestudy