Cargando…

Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion

BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a method that allows decompression of the spinal canal and nerve roots by laminectomy combined with fusion by means of intervertebral cages filled with bone graft and pedicle screw fixation. Conventional imaging techniques, such as plain radiog...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Brans, Boudewijn, Weijers, Rene, Halders, Serve, Wierts, Roel, Peters, Marloes, Punt, Ilona, Willems, Paul
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-2-42
_version_ 1782243668258717696
author Brans, Boudewijn
Weijers, Rene
Halders, Serve
Wierts, Roel
Peters, Marloes
Punt, Ilona
Willems, Paul
author_facet Brans, Boudewijn
Weijers, Rene
Halders, Serve
Wierts, Roel
Peters, Marloes
Punt, Ilona
Willems, Paul
author_sort Brans, Boudewijn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a method that allows decompression of the spinal canal and nerve roots by laminectomy combined with fusion by means of intervertebral cages filled with bone graft and pedicle screw fixation. Conventional imaging techniques, such as plain radiography and computed tomography (CT), have limitations to assess bony fusion dynamics. METHODS: In 16 PLIFs of 15 patients with persisting symptoms, positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT scans were made 60 min after intravenous administration of 156 to 263 MBq of (18) F-fluoride, including 1-mm sliced, high-dose, non-contrast-enhanced CT scanning. Maximal standard uptake values (SUVmax) of various regions were calculated and correlated with abnormalities on CT. RESULTS: Subsidence of the cages into the vertebral endplates was the most frequently observed abnormality on CT (in 16 of 27 or 59% of evaluable endplates). Endplate SUVmax values were significantly higher for those patients with pronounced (p < 0.0001) or moderate (p < 0.013) subsidence as compared to those with no subsidence. Additionally, a significant correlation between vertebral and ipsilateral pedicle screw entrance SUVmax values (p < 0.009) was found, possibly indicating posterior transmission of increased bone stress. In our patient group, intercorporal fusion was seen on CT in 63% but showed no correlation to intercorporal SUVmax values. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of (18) F-fluoride PET/CT, intervertebral cage subsidence appeared to be a prominent finding in this patient group with persisting symptoms, and highly correlating with the degree of PET hyperactivity at the vertebral endplates and pedicle screw entry points. Further study using (18) F-fluoride PET/CT should specifically assess the role of metabolically active subsidence in a prospective patient group, to address its role in nonunion and as a cause of persisting pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3444360
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Springer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34443602012-09-18 Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion Brans, Boudewijn Weijers, Rene Halders, Serve Wierts, Roel Peters, Marloes Punt, Ilona Willems, Paul EJNMMI Res Preliminary Research BACKGROUND: Posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a method that allows decompression of the spinal canal and nerve roots by laminectomy combined with fusion by means of intervertebral cages filled with bone graft and pedicle screw fixation. Conventional imaging techniques, such as plain radiography and computed tomography (CT), have limitations to assess bony fusion dynamics. METHODS: In 16 PLIFs of 15 patients with persisting symptoms, positron-emission tomography (PET)/CT scans were made 60 min after intravenous administration of 156 to 263 MBq of (18) F-fluoride, including 1-mm sliced, high-dose, non-contrast-enhanced CT scanning. Maximal standard uptake values (SUVmax) of various regions were calculated and correlated with abnormalities on CT. RESULTS: Subsidence of the cages into the vertebral endplates was the most frequently observed abnormality on CT (in 16 of 27 or 59% of evaluable endplates). Endplate SUVmax values were significantly higher for those patients with pronounced (p < 0.0001) or moderate (p < 0.013) subsidence as compared to those with no subsidence. Additionally, a significant correlation between vertebral and ipsilateral pedicle screw entrance SUVmax values (p < 0.009) was found, possibly indicating posterior transmission of increased bone stress. In our patient group, intercorporal fusion was seen on CT in 63% but showed no correlation to intercorporal SUVmax values. CONCLUSIONS: With the use of (18) F-fluoride PET/CT, intervertebral cage subsidence appeared to be a prominent finding in this patient group with persisting symptoms, and highly correlating with the degree of PET hyperactivity at the vertebral endplates and pedicle screw entry points. Further study using (18) F-fluoride PET/CT should specifically assess the role of metabolically active subsidence in a prospective patient group, to address its role in nonunion and as a cause of persisting pain. Springer 2012-07-30 /pmc/articles/PMC3444360/ /pubmed/22846374 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-2-42 Text en Copyright ©2012 Brans et al.; licensee Springer. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Preliminary Research
Brans, Boudewijn
Weijers, Rene
Halders, Serve
Wierts, Roel
Peters, Marloes
Punt, Ilona
Willems, Paul
Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
title Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
title_full Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
title_fullStr Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
title_full_unstemmed Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
title_short Assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) F-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
title_sort assessment of bone graft incorporation by (18) f-fluoride positron-emission tomography/computed tomography in patients with persisting symptoms after posterior lumbar interbody fusion
topic Preliminary Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444360/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22846374
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2191-219X-2-42
work_keys_str_mv AT bransboudewijn assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT weijersrene assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT haldersserve assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT wiertsroel assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT petersmarloes assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT puntilona assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion
AT willemspaul assessmentofbonegraftincorporationby18ffluoridepositronemissiontomographycomputedtomographyinpatientswithpersistingsymptomsafterposteriorlumbarinterbodyfusion