Cargando…

Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in maternal blood during pregnancy, opening the possibility of early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for a variety of genetic conditions. Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, par...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wright, Caroline F, Wei, Yinghui, Higgins, Julian PT, Sagoo, Gurdeep S
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22937795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-476
_version_ 1782243687039762432
author Wright, Caroline F
Wei, Yinghui
Higgins, Julian PT
Sagoo, Gurdeep S
author_facet Wright, Caroline F
Wei, Yinghui
Higgins, Julian PT
Sagoo, Gurdeep S
author_sort Wright, Caroline F
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in maternal blood during pregnancy, opening the possibility of early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for a variety of genetic conditions. Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, particularly for pregnancies at risk of an X-linked condition. Here we report a review and meta-analysis of the published literature to evaluate the use of cffDNA for prenatal determination (diagnosis) of fetal sex. We applied a sensitive search of multiple bibliographic databases including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, the Cochrane library and Web of Science. RESULTS: Ninety studies, incorporating 9,965 pregnancies and 10,587 fetal sex results met our inclusion criteria. Overall mean sensitivity was 96.6% (95% credible interval 95.2% to 97.7%) and mean specificity was 98.9% (95% CI = 98.1% to 99.4%). These results vary very little with trimester or week of testing, indicating that the performance of the test is reliably high. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review and meta-analysis we conclude that fetal sex can be determined with a high level of accuracy by analyzing cffDNA. Using cffDNA in prenatal diagnosis to replace or complement existing invasive methods can remove or reduce the risk of miscarriage. Future work should concentrate on the economic and ethical considerations of implementing an early non-invasive test for fetal sex.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3444439
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34444392012-09-20 Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis Wright, Caroline F Wei, Yinghui Higgins, Julian PT Sagoo, Gurdeep S BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in maternal blood during pregnancy, opening the possibility of early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for a variety of genetic conditions. Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, particularly for pregnancies at risk of an X-linked condition. Here we report a review and meta-analysis of the published literature to evaluate the use of cffDNA for prenatal determination (diagnosis) of fetal sex. We applied a sensitive search of multiple bibliographic databases including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, the Cochrane library and Web of Science. RESULTS: Ninety studies, incorporating 9,965 pregnancies and 10,587 fetal sex results met our inclusion criteria. Overall mean sensitivity was 96.6% (95% credible interval 95.2% to 97.7%) and mean specificity was 98.9% (95% CI = 98.1% to 99.4%). These results vary very little with trimester or week of testing, indicating that the performance of the test is reliably high. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review and meta-analysis we conclude that fetal sex can be determined with a high level of accuracy by analyzing cffDNA. Using cffDNA in prenatal diagnosis to replace or complement existing invasive methods can remove or reduce the risk of miscarriage. Future work should concentrate on the economic and ethical considerations of implementing an early non-invasive test for fetal sex. BioMed Central 2012-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3444439/ /pubmed/22937795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-476 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wright et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Wright, Caroline F
Wei, Yinghui
Higgins, Julian PT
Sagoo, Gurdeep S
Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
title Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
title_full Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
title_short Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
title_sort non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free dna a review and meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444439/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22937795
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-476
work_keys_str_mv AT wrightcarolinef noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis
AT weiyinghui noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis
AT higginsjulianpt noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis
AT sagoogurdeeps noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis