Cargando…
Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis
BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in maternal blood during pregnancy, opening the possibility of early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for a variety of genetic conditions. Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, par...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22937795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-476 |
_version_ | 1782243687039762432 |
---|---|
author | Wright, Caroline F Wei, Yinghui Higgins, Julian PT Sagoo, Gurdeep S |
author_facet | Wright, Caroline F Wei, Yinghui Higgins, Julian PT Sagoo, Gurdeep S |
author_sort | Wright, Caroline F |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in maternal blood during pregnancy, opening the possibility of early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for a variety of genetic conditions. Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, particularly for pregnancies at risk of an X-linked condition. Here we report a review and meta-analysis of the published literature to evaluate the use of cffDNA for prenatal determination (diagnosis) of fetal sex. We applied a sensitive search of multiple bibliographic databases including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, the Cochrane library and Web of Science. RESULTS: Ninety studies, incorporating 9,965 pregnancies and 10,587 fetal sex results met our inclusion criteria. Overall mean sensitivity was 96.6% (95% credible interval 95.2% to 97.7%) and mean specificity was 98.9% (95% CI = 98.1% to 99.4%). These results vary very little with trimester or week of testing, indicating that the performance of the test is reliably high. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review and meta-analysis we conclude that fetal sex can be determined with a high level of accuracy by analyzing cffDNA. Using cffDNA in prenatal diagnosis to replace or complement existing invasive methods can remove or reduce the risk of miscarriage. Future work should concentrate on the economic and ethical considerations of implementing an early non-invasive test for fetal sex. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3444439 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34444392012-09-20 Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis Wright, Caroline F Wei, Yinghui Higgins, Julian PT Sagoo, Gurdeep S BMC Res Notes Research Article BACKGROUND: Cell-free fetal DNA (cffDNA) can be detected in maternal blood during pregnancy, opening the possibility of early non-invasive prenatal diagnosis for a variety of genetic conditions. Since 1997, many studies have examined the accuracy of prenatal fetal sex determination using cffDNA, particularly for pregnancies at risk of an X-linked condition. Here we report a review and meta-analysis of the published literature to evaluate the use of cffDNA for prenatal determination (diagnosis) of fetal sex. We applied a sensitive search of multiple bibliographic databases including PubMed (MEDLINE), EMBASE, the Cochrane library and Web of Science. RESULTS: Ninety studies, incorporating 9,965 pregnancies and 10,587 fetal sex results met our inclusion criteria. Overall mean sensitivity was 96.6% (95% credible interval 95.2% to 97.7%) and mean specificity was 98.9% (95% CI = 98.1% to 99.4%). These results vary very little with trimester or week of testing, indicating that the performance of the test is reliably high. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this review and meta-analysis we conclude that fetal sex can be determined with a high level of accuracy by analyzing cffDNA. Using cffDNA in prenatal diagnosis to replace or complement existing invasive methods can remove or reduce the risk of miscarriage. Future work should concentrate on the economic and ethical considerations of implementing an early non-invasive test for fetal sex. BioMed Central 2012-09-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3444439/ /pubmed/22937795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-476 Text en Copyright ©2012 Wright et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Wright, Caroline F Wei, Yinghui Higgins, Julian PT Sagoo, Gurdeep S Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis |
title | Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis |
title_full | Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr | Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis |
title_short | Non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free DNA a review and meta-analysis |
title_sort | non-invasive prenatal diagnostic test accuracy for fetal sex using cell-free dna a review and meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444439/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22937795 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-476 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wrightcarolinef noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis AT weiyinghui noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis AT higginsjulianpt noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis AT sagoogurdeeps noninvasiveprenataldiagnostictestaccuracyforfetalsexusingcellfreednaareviewandmetaanalysis |