Cargando…
Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series
BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is mainly used to evaluate patients with celiac disease in whom their course after diagnosis has been unfavorable and the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, lymphoma or refractory celiac disease is entertained, but it has been suggested that VCE could replace esop...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22812595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-90 |
_version_ | 1782243737156452352 |
---|---|
author | Chang, Matthew S Rubin, Moshe Lewis, Suzanne K Green, Peter H |
author_facet | Chang, Matthew S Rubin, Moshe Lewis, Suzanne K Green, Peter H |
author_sort | Chang, Matthew S |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is mainly used to evaluate patients with celiac disease in whom their course after diagnosis has been unfavorable and the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, lymphoma or refractory celiac disease is entertained, but it has been suggested that VCE could replace esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy under certain circumstances. METHODS: We report a single center case series of 8 patients with suspected celiac disease who were diagnosed by VCE. RESULTS: EGD and biopsy had been performed in 4 patients resulting in a negative biopsy, declined by 2, and contraindicated in 2 due to hemophilia and von Willebrand disease. In all patients, mucosal changes of scalloping, mucosal mosaicism and reduced folds were seen in either the duodenum or jejunum on VCE. Follow-up in 7 patients demonstrated improvement in either their serological abnormalities or their presenting clinical features on a gluten-free diet. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series demonstrates that VCE and the visualization of the characteristic mucosal changes of villous atrophy may replace biopsy as the mode of diagnosis when EGD is either declined or contraindicated, or when duodenal biopsies are negative and there remains a high index of suspicion. Further study is needed to clarify the role and cost of diagnosing celiac disease with VCE. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3444909 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34449092012-09-19 Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series Chang, Matthew S Rubin, Moshe Lewis, Suzanne K Green, Peter H BMC Gastroenterol Research Article BACKGROUND: Video capsule endoscopy (VCE) is mainly used to evaluate patients with celiac disease in whom their course after diagnosis has been unfavorable and the diagnosis of adenocarcinoma, lymphoma or refractory celiac disease is entertained, but it has been suggested that VCE could replace esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy under certain circumstances. METHODS: We report a single center case series of 8 patients with suspected celiac disease who were diagnosed by VCE. RESULTS: EGD and biopsy had been performed in 4 patients resulting in a negative biopsy, declined by 2, and contraindicated in 2 due to hemophilia and von Willebrand disease. In all patients, mucosal changes of scalloping, mucosal mosaicism and reduced folds were seen in either the duodenum or jejunum on VCE. Follow-up in 7 patients demonstrated improvement in either their serological abnormalities or their presenting clinical features on a gluten-free diet. CONCLUSIONS: Our case series demonstrates that VCE and the visualization of the characteristic mucosal changes of villous atrophy may replace biopsy as the mode of diagnosis when EGD is either declined or contraindicated, or when duodenal biopsies are negative and there remains a high index of suspicion. Further study is needed to clarify the role and cost of diagnosing celiac disease with VCE. BioMed Central 2012-07-19 /pmc/articles/PMC3444909/ /pubmed/22812595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-90 Text en Copyright ©2012 Chang et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chang, Matthew S Rubin, Moshe Lewis, Suzanne K Green, Peter H Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
title | Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
title_full | Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
title_fullStr | Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
title_short | Diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (VCE) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
title_sort | diagnosing celiac disease by video capsule endoscopy (vce) when esophogastroduodenoscopy (egd) and biopsy is unable to provide a diagnosis: a case series |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3444909/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22812595 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-230X-12-90 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT changmatthews diagnosingceliacdiseasebyvideocapsuleendoscopyvcewhenesophogastroduodenoscopyegdandbiopsyisunabletoprovideadiagnosisacaseseries AT rubinmoshe diagnosingceliacdiseasebyvideocapsuleendoscopyvcewhenesophogastroduodenoscopyegdandbiopsyisunabletoprovideadiagnosisacaseseries AT lewissuzannek diagnosingceliacdiseasebyvideocapsuleendoscopyvcewhenesophogastroduodenoscopyegdandbiopsyisunabletoprovideadiagnosisacaseseries AT greenpeterh diagnosingceliacdiseasebyvideocapsuleendoscopyvcewhenesophogastroduodenoscopyegdandbiopsyisunabletoprovideadiagnosisacaseseries |