Cargando…

Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations

CONTEXT: Primary anterior shoulder dislocation is a frequent injury in young active patients. Traditionally, conservative nonoperative primary treatment has been advocated for a majority of first-time dislocators, whereas operative stabilization has been reserved for recurrent dislocators or those i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Godin, Jonathan, Sekiya, Jon K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2010
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738109359507
_version_ 1782243761154162688
author Godin, Jonathan
Sekiya, Jon K.
author_facet Godin, Jonathan
Sekiya, Jon K.
author_sort Godin, Jonathan
collection PubMed
description CONTEXT: Primary anterior shoulder dislocation is a frequent injury in young active patients. Traditionally, conservative nonoperative primary treatment has been advocated for a majority of first-time dislocators, whereas operative stabilization has been reserved for recurrent dislocators or those involved in strenuous physical activity. Currently, no consensus exists on whether to treat a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation surgically. OBJECTIVE: (1) To provide clinical recommendations regarding the therapeutic intervention for first-time anterior shoulder dislocators and (2) to determine if there is sufficient Level 1 or 2 evidence available for the establishment of a uniform, optimal treatment protocol. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of prospective randomized controlled trials with human participants was performed. PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and secondary references were appraised for studies published between 1994 and 2009. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were English-language Level 1 or 2 studies involving the treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation. Exclusion criteria included non-English-language articles; Level 3, 4, or 5 studies; and studies examining treatment of recurrent/posterior shoulder dislocation or diagnoses other than primary anterior shoulder dislocations. DATA EXTRACTION: Each author conducted an independent quality appraisal of the included studies, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and biases, then reached consensus regarding their values. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included, and they supported the use of operative management in a focused population. No long-term follow-up data were available describing the effects of surgical intervention or the development of osteoarthritis. Each study design had weaknesses that decreased the validity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: While limited, the available evidence from randomized controlled trials supports operative stabilization as a reasonable alternative to nonoperative treatment for primary acute shoulder dislocation in young, active adults participating in highly demanding physical activities. Recommendations on the optimal surgical intervention cannot be provided. There is no conclusive evidence available to determine whether operative stabilization or conservative rehabilitation is superior for other patient or injury types.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3445078
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2010
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34450782012-09-26 Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations Godin, Jonathan Sekiya, Jon K. Sports Health Orthopaedics CONTEXT: Primary anterior shoulder dislocation is a frequent injury in young active patients. Traditionally, conservative nonoperative primary treatment has been advocated for a majority of first-time dislocators, whereas operative stabilization has been reserved for recurrent dislocators or those involved in strenuous physical activity. Currently, no consensus exists on whether to treat a first-time anterior shoulder dislocation surgically. OBJECTIVE: (1) To provide clinical recommendations regarding the therapeutic intervention for first-time anterior shoulder dislocators and (2) to determine if there is sufficient Level 1 or 2 evidence available for the establishment of a uniform, optimal treatment protocol. DATA SOURCES: A systematic review of prospective randomized controlled trials with human participants was performed. PubMed, the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and secondary references were appraised for studies published between 1994 and 2009. STUDY SELECTION: Inclusion criteria were English-language Level 1 or 2 studies involving the treatment of primary anterior shoulder dislocation. Exclusion criteria included non-English-language articles; Level 3, 4, or 5 studies; and studies examining treatment of recurrent/posterior shoulder dislocation or diagnoses other than primary anterior shoulder dislocations. DATA EXTRACTION: Each author conducted an independent quality appraisal of the included studies, identifying strengths, weaknesses, and biases, then reached consensus regarding their values. RESULTS: Five randomized controlled trials were included, and they supported the use of operative management in a focused population. No long-term follow-up data were available describing the effects of surgical intervention or the development of osteoarthritis. Each study design had weaknesses that decreased the validity of the findings. CONCLUSIONS: While limited, the available evidence from randomized controlled trials supports operative stabilization as a reasonable alternative to nonoperative treatment for primary acute shoulder dislocation in young, active adults participating in highly demanding physical activities. Recommendations on the optimal surgical intervention cannot be provided. There is no conclusive evidence available to determine whether operative stabilization or conservative rehabilitation is superior for other patient or injury types. SAGE Publications 2010-03 /pmc/articles/PMC3445078/ /pubmed/23015933 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738109359507 Text en © 2010 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Orthopaedics
Godin, Jonathan
Sekiya, Jon K.
Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations
title Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations
title_full Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations
title_fullStr Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations
title_full_unstemmed Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations
title_short Systematic Review of Rehabilitation Versus Operative Stabilization for the Treatment of First-Time Anterior Shoulder Dislocations
title_sort systematic review of rehabilitation versus operative stabilization for the treatment of first-time anterior shoulder dislocations
topic Orthopaedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445078/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015933
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738109359507
work_keys_str_mv AT godinjonathan systematicreviewofrehabilitationversusoperativestabilizationforthetreatmentoffirsttimeanteriorshoulderdislocations
AT sekiyajonk systematicreviewofrehabilitationversusoperativestabilizationforthetreatmentoffirsttimeanteriorshoulderdislocations