Cargando…
Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
BACKGROUND: Identification of highly active individuals early after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency who are good candidates for nonoperative management is a clinical challenge. The University of Delaware has developed and validated a treatment algorithm and screening examination to disti...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2009
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445111/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738108326977 |
Sumario: | BACKGROUND: Identification of highly active individuals early after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency who are good candidates for nonoperative management is a clinical challenge. The University of Delaware has developed and validated a treatment algorithm and screening examination to distinguish between nonoperative and surgical candidates. STUDY DESIGN: Review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A description of the decision-making rules and rehabilitation protocol for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is provided. Results from clinical trials, outcome studies, and biomechanical investigations conducted using the treatment algorithm and screening examination are also reviewed. RESULTS: Patients identified as nonoperative rehabilitation candidates using these clinical guidelines have a far greater success rate than what has been reported when patients self-select nonoperative management. Furthermore, nonoperative outcomes are improved when patients participate in a perturbation-enhanced rehabilitation protocol. Divergent lower extremity movement patterns are consistent with the different functional abilities of the dichotomous patient groups identified with the screening examination. CONCLUSION: Given the differential patient response to anterior cruciate ligament injury, implementation of the decision-making guidelines discussed in this review offers clinicians the opportunity to provide individualized patient care rather than continuing with a blanket surgical treatment strategy. |
---|