Cargando…

Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency

BACKGROUND: Identification of highly active individuals early after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency who are good candidates for nonoperative management is a clinical challenge. The University of Delaware has developed and validated a treatment algorithm and screening examination to disti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurd, Wendy, Axe, Michael, Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738108326977
_version_ 1782243768974442496
author Hurd, Wendy
Axe, Michael
Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
author_facet Hurd, Wendy
Axe, Michael
Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
author_sort Hurd, Wendy
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Identification of highly active individuals early after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency who are good candidates for nonoperative management is a clinical challenge. The University of Delaware has developed and validated a treatment algorithm and screening examination to distinguish between nonoperative and surgical candidates. STUDY DESIGN: Review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A description of the decision-making rules and rehabilitation protocol for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is provided. Results from clinical trials, outcome studies, and biomechanical investigations conducted using the treatment algorithm and screening examination are also reviewed. RESULTS: Patients identified as nonoperative rehabilitation candidates using these clinical guidelines have a far greater success rate than what has been reported when patients self-select nonoperative management. Furthermore, nonoperative outcomes are improved when patients participate in a perturbation-enhanced rehabilitation protocol. Divergent lower extremity movement patterns are consistent with the different functional abilities of the dichotomous patient groups identified with the screening examination. CONCLUSION: Given the differential patient response to anterior cruciate ligament injury, implementation of the decision-making guidelines discussed in this review offers clinicians the opportunity to provide individualized patient care rather than continuing with a blanket surgical treatment strategy.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3445111
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34451112012-09-26 Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency Hurd, Wendy Axe, Michael Snyder-Mackler, Lynn Sports Health Sports Physical Therapy BACKGROUND: Identification of highly active individuals early after acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency who are good candidates for nonoperative management is a clinical challenge. The University of Delaware has developed and validated a treatment algorithm and screening examination to distinguish between nonoperative and surgical candidates. STUDY DESIGN: Review. EVIDENCE ACQUISITION: A description of the decision-making rules and rehabilitation protocol for highly active individuals with anterior cruciate ligament deficiency is provided. Results from clinical trials, outcome studies, and biomechanical investigations conducted using the treatment algorithm and screening examination are also reviewed. RESULTS: Patients identified as nonoperative rehabilitation candidates using these clinical guidelines have a far greater success rate than what has been reported when patients self-select nonoperative management. Furthermore, nonoperative outcomes are improved when patients participate in a perturbation-enhanced rehabilitation protocol. Divergent lower extremity movement patterns are consistent with the different functional abilities of the dichotomous patient groups identified with the screening examination. CONCLUSION: Given the differential patient response to anterior cruciate ligament injury, implementation of the decision-making guidelines discussed in this review offers clinicians the opportunity to provide individualized patient care rather than continuing with a blanket surgical treatment strategy. SAGE Publications 2009-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3445111/ /pubmed/23015853 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738108326977 Text en © 2009 American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine
spellingShingle Sports Physical Therapy
Hurd, Wendy
Axe, Michael
Snyder-Mackler, Lynn
Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_full Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_fullStr Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_full_unstemmed Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_short Management of the Athlete with Acute Anterior Cruciate Ligament Deficiency
title_sort management of the athlete with acute anterior cruciate ligament deficiency
topic Sports Physical Therapy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445111/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015853
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738108326977
work_keys_str_mv AT hurdwendy managementoftheathletewithacuteanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT axemichael managementoftheathletewithacuteanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency
AT snydermacklerlynn managementoftheathletewithacuteanteriorcruciateligamentdeficiency