Cargando…

Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is uncommonly complicated by postoperative infections, the causes of which are rarely identified. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to characterize the relationship between methodological sterilization failure and ACL reconstru...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Parada, Stephen A., Grassbaugh, Jason A., DeVine, John G., Arrington, Edward D.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2009
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738109347975
_version_ 1782243777274970112
author Parada, Stephen A.
Grassbaugh, Jason A.
DeVine, John G.
Arrington, Edward D.
author_facet Parada, Stephen A.
Grassbaugh, Jason A.
DeVine, John G.
Arrington, Edward D.
author_sort Parada, Stephen A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is uncommonly complicated by postoperative infections, the causes of which are rarely identified. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to characterize the relationship between methodological sterilization failure and ACL reconstruction infection at an army medical center. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected on 5 postoperative infections during a 14-week period in 2003. All ACL reconstructions completed within the past 6 years at the institution were reviewed to establish a baseline infection rate. RESULTS: There was a 14-week period in which 5 cases of infection occurred postoperatively, an infection rate of 12.2%. Previous and subsequent to the identified period, the established rate of infection after ACL reconstruction was 0.3%. There were no violations of sterile technique noted in any of the identified cases. All cases utilized hamstring autograft. All cases also used the DePuy Mitek Intrafix system for tibial fixation of the graft. Two of these cases had positive cultures. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated series of increased infection rate led to an investigation into the sterile technique. This revealed gross biomaterial remaining inside instrumentation common to all the cases, the DePuy Mitek Intrafix system. The modular cannulated hex driver, made to fit over a small caliber wire, had no wire brushes of a small-enough diameter for the cleaning and sterilization procedure. After recognition of infection, all patients were treated with surgical irrigation and debridement of the affected knee, as well as individualized antibiotic therapy. Patients were followed postoperatively and no patients required revision ACL reconstruction or radical debridement of the graft.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3445146
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2009
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34451462012-09-26 Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Parada, Stephen A. Grassbaugh, Jason A. DeVine, John G. Arrington, Edward D. Sports Health Orthopaedics BACKGROUND: Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is uncommonly complicated by postoperative infections, the causes of which are rarely identified. HYPOTHESIS/PURPOSE: The goal of this study was to characterize the relationship between methodological sterilization failure and ACL reconstruction infection at an army medical center. STUDY DESIGN: Case series. METHODS: Demographic, clinical, and laboratory data were collected on 5 postoperative infections during a 14-week period in 2003. All ACL reconstructions completed within the past 6 years at the institution were reviewed to establish a baseline infection rate. RESULTS: There was a 14-week period in which 5 cases of infection occurred postoperatively, an infection rate of 12.2%. Previous and subsequent to the identified period, the established rate of infection after ACL reconstruction was 0.3%. There were no violations of sterile technique noted in any of the identified cases. All cases utilized hamstring autograft. All cases also used the DePuy Mitek Intrafix system for tibial fixation of the graft. Two of these cases had positive cultures. CONCLUSIONS: An isolated series of increased infection rate led to an investigation into the sterile technique. This revealed gross biomaterial remaining inside instrumentation common to all the cases, the DePuy Mitek Intrafix system. The modular cannulated hex driver, made to fit over a small caliber wire, had no wire brushes of a small-enough diameter for the cleaning and sterilization procedure. After recognition of infection, all patients were treated with surgical irrigation and debridement of the affected knee, as well as individualized antibiotic therapy. Patients were followed postoperatively and no patients required revision ACL reconstruction or radical debridement of the graft. SAGE Publications 2009-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3445146/ /pubmed/23015910 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738109347975 Text en © 2009 The Author(s)
spellingShingle Orthopaedics
Parada, Stephen A.
Grassbaugh, Jason A.
DeVine, John G.
Arrington, Edward D.
Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_fullStr Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_full_unstemmed Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_short Instrumentation-Specific Infection After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
title_sort instrumentation-specific infection after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction
topic Orthopaedics
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3445146/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015910
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1941738109347975
work_keys_str_mv AT paradastephena instrumentationspecificinfectionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT grassbaughjasona instrumentationspecificinfectionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT devinejohng instrumentationspecificinfectionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction
AT arringtonedwardd instrumentationspecificinfectionafteranteriorcruciateligamentreconstruction