Cargando…
Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a result of HER2 gene amplification is associated with a relatively poor prognosis in breast cancer and is predictive of HER2-targeting therapy response. False-positive rates of up to 20% for HER2 testing have bee...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3208 |
_version_ | 1782243955554910208 |
---|---|
author | Dekker, Tim JA Borg, Susan Ter Hooijer, Gerrit KJ Meijer, Sybren L Wesseling, Jelle Boers, James E Schuuring, Ed Bart, Jos van Gorp, Joost Mesker, Wilma E Kroep, Judith R Smit, Vincent THBM van de Vijver, Marc J |
author_facet | Dekker, Tim JA Borg, Susan Ter Hooijer, Gerrit KJ Meijer, Sybren L Wesseling, Jelle Boers, James E Schuuring, Ed Bart, Jos van Gorp, Joost Mesker, Wilma E Kroep, Judith R Smit, Vincent THBM van de Vijver, Marc J |
author_sort | Dekker, Tim JA |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a result of HER2 gene amplification is associated with a relatively poor prognosis in breast cancer and is predictive of HER2-targeting therapy response. False-positive rates of up to 20% for HER2 testing have been described. HER2-testing laboratories are therefore encouraged to participate in external quality control schemes in order to improve HER2-testing standardization. METHODS: This study investigated the feasibility of retesting large numbers of invasive breast cancers for HER2 status on tissue micro-array (TMA) as part of a quality control scheme. For this assessment different HER2 testing methods were used including HER2 detecting antibodies SP3, 4B5, Herceptest and mono color silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and dual color SISH. Final HER2 status for each tumor on the TMA was compared to the local testing result for the same tumor. Discordances between these two results were investigated further by staining whole tumor sections. RESULTS: For this study, 1,210 invasive breast carcinomas of patients treated in six hospitals between 2006 and 2008 were evaluated. Results from the three immunohistochemistry (IHC) and two in situ hybridization (ISH) assays performed on the TMAs were compared. The final HER2 status on TMA was determined with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH. Concordance between local HER2 test results and TMA retesting was 98.0%. Discordant results between local and TMA retesting were found in 20 tumors (2.0%). False positive HER2 IHC results were identified in 13 (1.3%) tumors; false negative IHC results in seven (0.7%) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Retesting large volumes of HER2 classified breast carcinomas was found to be feasible and can be reliably performed by staining TMAs with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH in combination with full-sized slides for discordant cases. The frequency of false-positive results was lower than previously reported in the literature. This method is now offered to other HER2-testing laboratories. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3446356 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34463562012-09-20 Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach Dekker, Tim JA Borg, Susan Ter Hooijer, Gerrit KJ Meijer, Sybren L Wesseling, Jelle Boers, James E Schuuring, Ed Bart, Jos van Gorp, Joost Mesker, Wilma E Kroep, Judith R Smit, Vincent THBM van de Vijver, Marc J Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a result of HER2 gene amplification is associated with a relatively poor prognosis in breast cancer and is predictive of HER2-targeting therapy response. False-positive rates of up to 20% for HER2 testing have been described. HER2-testing laboratories are therefore encouraged to participate in external quality control schemes in order to improve HER2-testing standardization. METHODS: This study investigated the feasibility of retesting large numbers of invasive breast cancers for HER2 status on tissue micro-array (TMA) as part of a quality control scheme. For this assessment different HER2 testing methods were used including HER2 detecting antibodies SP3, 4B5, Herceptest and mono color silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and dual color SISH. Final HER2 status for each tumor on the TMA was compared to the local testing result for the same tumor. Discordances between these two results were investigated further by staining whole tumor sections. RESULTS: For this study, 1,210 invasive breast carcinomas of patients treated in six hospitals between 2006 and 2008 were evaluated. Results from the three immunohistochemistry (IHC) and two in situ hybridization (ISH) assays performed on the TMAs were compared. The final HER2 status on TMA was determined with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH. Concordance between local HER2 test results and TMA retesting was 98.0%. Discordant results between local and TMA retesting were found in 20 tumors (2.0%). False positive HER2 IHC results were identified in 13 (1.3%) tumors; false negative IHC results in seven (0.7%) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Retesting large volumes of HER2 classified breast carcinomas was found to be feasible and can be reliably performed by staining TMAs with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH in combination with full-sized slides for discordant cases. The frequency of false-positive results was lower than previously reported in the literature. This method is now offered to other HER2-testing laboratories. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3446356/ /pubmed/22694844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3208 Text en Copyright ©2012 Dekker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Dekker, Tim JA Borg, Susan Ter Hooijer, Gerrit KJ Meijer, Sybren L Wesseling, Jelle Boers, James E Schuuring, Ed Bart, Jos van Gorp, Joost Mesker, Wilma E Kroep, Judith R Smit, Vincent THBM van de Vijver, Marc J Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
title | Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
title_full | Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
title_fullStr | Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
title_full_unstemmed | Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
title_short | Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
title_sort | determining sensitivity and specificity of her2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446356/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3208 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT dekkertimja determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT borgsusanter determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT hooijergerritkj determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT meijersybrenl determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT wesselingjelle determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT boersjamese determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT schuuringed determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT bartjos determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT vangorpjoost determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT meskerwilmae determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT kroepjudithr determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT smitvincentthbm determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach AT vandevijvermarcj determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach |