Cargando…

Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach

INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a result of HER2 gene amplification is associated with a relatively poor prognosis in breast cancer and is predictive of HER2-targeting therapy response. False-positive rates of up to 20% for HER2 testing have bee...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dekker, Tim JA, Borg, Susan Ter, Hooijer, Gerrit KJ, Meijer, Sybren L, Wesseling, Jelle, Boers, James E, Schuuring, Ed, Bart, Jos, van Gorp, Joost, Mesker, Wilma E, Kroep, Judith R, Smit, Vincent THBM, van de Vijver, Marc J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3208
_version_ 1782243955554910208
author Dekker, Tim JA
Borg, Susan Ter
Hooijer, Gerrit KJ
Meijer, Sybren L
Wesseling, Jelle
Boers, James E
Schuuring, Ed
Bart, Jos
van Gorp, Joost
Mesker, Wilma E
Kroep, Judith R
Smit, Vincent THBM
van de Vijver, Marc J
author_facet Dekker, Tim JA
Borg, Susan Ter
Hooijer, Gerrit KJ
Meijer, Sybren L
Wesseling, Jelle
Boers, James E
Schuuring, Ed
Bart, Jos
van Gorp, Joost
Mesker, Wilma E
Kroep, Judith R
Smit, Vincent THBM
van de Vijver, Marc J
author_sort Dekker, Tim JA
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a result of HER2 gene amplification is associated with a relatively poor prognosis in breast cancer and is predictive of HER2-targeting therapy response. False-positive rates of up to 20% for HER2 testing have been described. HER2-testing laboratories are therefore encouraged to participate in external quality control schemes in order to improve HER2-testing standardization. METHODS: This study investigated the feasibility of retesting large numbers of invasive breast cancers for HER2 status on tissue micro-array (TMA) as part of a quality control scheme. For this assessment different HER2 testing methods were used including HER2 detecting antibodies SP3, 4B5, Herceptest and mono color silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and dual color SISH. Final HER2 status for each tumor on the TMA was compared to the local testing result for the same tumor. Discordances between these two results were investigated further by staining whole tumor sections. RESULTS: For this study, 1,210 invasive breast carcinomas of patients treated in six hospitals between 2006 and 2008 were evaluated. Results from the three immunohistochemistry (IHC) and two in situ hybridization (ISH) assays performed on the TMAs were compared. The final HER2 status on TMA was determined with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH. Concordance between local HER2 test results and TMA retesting was 98.0%. Discordant results between local and TMA retesting were found in 20 tumors (2.0%). False positive HER2 IHC results were identified in 13 (1.3%) tumors; false negative IHC results in seven (0.7%) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Retesting large volumes of HER2 classified breast carcinomas was found to be feasible and can be reliably performed by staining TMAs with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH in combination with full-sized slides for discordant cases. The frequency of false-positive results was lower than previously reported in the literature. This method is now offered to other HER2-testing laboratories.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3446356
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34463562012-09-20 Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach Dekker, Tim JA Borg, Susan Ter Hooijer, Gerrit KJ Meijer, Sybren L Wesseling, Jelle Boers, James E Schuuring, Ed Bart, Jos van Gorp, Joost Mesker, Wilma E Kroep, Judith R Smit, Vincent THBM van de Vijver, Marc J Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: Overexpression of the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) as a result of HER2 gene amplification is associated with a relatively poor prognosis in breast cancer and is predictive of HER2-targeting therapy response. False-positive rates of up to 20% for HER2 testing have been described. HER2-testing laboratories are therefore encouraged to participate in external quality control schemes in order to improve HER2-testing standardization. METHODS: This study investigated the feasibility of retesting large numbers of invasive breast cancers for HER2 status on tissue micro-array (TMA) as part of a quality control scheme. For this assessment different HER2 testing methods were used including HER2 detecting antibodies SP3, 4B5, Herceptest and mono color silver in situ hybridization (SISH) and dual color SISH. Final HER2 status for each tumor on the TMA was compared to the local testing result for the same tumor. Discordances between these two results were investigated further by staining whole tumor sections. RESULTS: For this study, 1,210 invasive breast carcinomas of patients treated in six hospitals between 2006 and 2008 were evaluated. Results from the three immunohistochemistry (IHC) and two in situ hybridization (ISH) assays performed on the TMAs were compared. The final HER2 status on TMA was determined with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH. Concordance between local HER2 test results and TMA retesting was 98.0%. Discordant results between local and TMA retesting were found in 20 tumors (2.0%). False positive HER2 IHC results were identified in 13 (1.3%) tumors; false negative IHC results in seven (0.7%) tumors. CONCLUSIONS: Retesting large volumes of HER2 classified breast carcinomas was found to be feasible and can be reliably performed by staining TMAs with SP3, 4B5 and mono color SISH in combination with full-sized slides for discordant cases. The frequency of false-positive results was lower than previously reported in the literature. This method is now offered to other HER2-testing laboratories. BioMed Central 2012 2012-06-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3446356/ /pubmed/22694844 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3208 Text en Copyright ©2012 Dekker et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Dekker, Tim JA
Borg, Susan Ter
Hooijer, Gerrit KJ
Meijer, Sybren L
Wesseling, Jelle
Boers, James E
Schuuring, Ed
Bart, Jos
van Gorp, Joost
Mesker, Wilma E
Kroep, Judith R
Smit, Vincent THBM
van de Vijver, Marc J
Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
title Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
title_full Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
title_fullStr Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
title_full_unstemmed Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
title_short Determining sensitivity and specificity of HER2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
title_sort determining sensitivity and specificity of her2 testing in breast cancer using a tissue micro-array approach
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446356/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22694844
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3208
work_keys_str_mv AT dekkertimja determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT borgsusanter determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT hooijergerritkj determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT meijersybrenl determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT wesselingjelle determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT boersjamese determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT schuuringed determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT bartjos determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT vangorpjoost determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT meskerwilmae determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT kroepjudithr determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT smitvincentthbm determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach
AT vandevijvermarcj determiningsensitivityandspecificityofher2testinginbreastcancerusingatissuemicroarrayapproach