Cargando…

Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer

INTRODUCTION: A younger age at menarche and an older age at menopause are well established risk factors for breast cancer. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified several novel genetic loci associated with these two traits. However, the association between these loci and breast cancer...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: He, Chunyan, Chasman, Daniel I, Dreyfus, Jill, Hwang, Shih-Jen, Ruiter, Rikje, Sanna, Serena, Buring, Julie E, Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay, Franceschini, Nora, Hankinson, Susan E, Hofman, Albert, Lunetta, Kathryn L, Palmieri, Giuseppe, Porcu, Eleonora, Rivadeneira, Fernando, Rose, Lynda M, Splansky, Greta L, Stolk, Lisette, Uitterlinden, André G, Chanock, Stephen J, Crisponi, Laura, Demerath, Ellen W, Murabito, Joanne M, Ridker, Paul M, Stricker, Bruno H, Hunter, David J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22433456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3155
_version_ 1782243963114094592
author He, Chunyan
Chasman, Daniel I
Dreyfus, Jill
Hwang, Shih-Jen
Ruiter, Rikje
Sanna, Serena
Buring, Julie E
Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay
Franceschini, Nora
Hankinson, Susan E
Hofman, Albert
Lunetta, Kathryn L
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Porcu, Eleonora
Rivadeneira, Fernando
Rose, Lynda M
Splansky, Greta L
Stolk, Lisette
Uitterlinden, André G
Chanock, Stephen J
Crisponi, Laura
Demerath, Ellen W
Murabito, Joanne M
Ridker, Paul M
Stricker, Bruno H
Hunter, David J
author_facet He, Chunyan
Chasman, Daniel I
Dreyfus, Jill
Hwang, Shih-Jen
Ruiter, Rikje
Sanna, Serena
Buring, Julie E
Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay
Franceschini, Nora
Hankinson, Susan E
Hofman, Albert
Lunetta, Kathryn L
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Porcu, Eleonora
Rivadeneira, Fernando
Rose, Lynda M
Splansky, Greta L
Stolk, Lisette
Uitterlinden, André G
Chanock, Stephen J
Crisponi, Laura
Demerath, Ellen W
Murabito, Joanne M
Ridker, Paul M
Stricker, Bruno H
Hunter, David J
author_sort He, Chunyan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: A younger age at menarche and an older age at menopause are well established risk factors for breast cancer. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified several novel genetic loci associated with these two traits. However, the association between these loci and breast cancer risk is unknown. METHODS: In this study, we investigated 19 and 17 newly identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the ReproGen Consortium that have been associated with age at menarche and age at natural menopause, respectively, and assessed their associations with breast cancer risk in 6 population-based studies among up to 3,683 breast cancer cases and 34,174 controls in white women of European ancestry. In addition, we used these SNPs to calculate genetic risk scores (GRSs) based on their associations with each trait. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and potential population stratification, two age at menarche associated SNPs (rs1079866 and rs7821178) and one age at natural menopause associated SNP (rs2517388) were associated with breast cancer risk (p values, 0.003, 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). The odds ratios for breast cancer corresponding to per-risk-allele were 1.14 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.24), 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.15) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.20), respectively, and were in the direction predicted by their associations with age at menarche or age at natural menopause. These associations did not appear to be attenuated by further controlling for self-reported age at menarche, age at natural menopause, or known breast cancer susceptibility loci. Although we did not observe a statistically significant association between any GRS for reproductive aging and breast cancer risk, the 4(th )and 5(th )highest quintiles of the younger age at menarche GRS had odds ratios of 1.14 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.28) and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.27), respectively, compared to the lowest quintile. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that three genetic variants, independent of their associations with age at menarche or age at natural menopause, were associated with breast cancer risk and may contribute modestly to breast cancer risk prediction; however, the combination of the 19 age at menarche or the 17 age at natural menopause associated SNPs did not appear to be useful for identifying a high risk subgroup for breast cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3446388
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34463882012-09-20 Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer He, Chunyan Chasman, Daniel I Dreyfus, Jill Hwang, Shih-Jen Ruiter, Rikje Sanna, Serena Buring, Julie E Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay Franceschini, Nora Hankinson, Susan E Hofman, Albert Lunetta, Kathryn L Palmieri, Giuseppe Porcu, Eleonora Rivadeneira, Fernando Rose, Lynda M Splansky, Greta L Stolk, Lisette Uitterlinden, André G Chanock, Stephen J Crisponi, Laura Demerath, Ellen W Murabito, Joanne M Ridker, Paul M Stricker, Bruno H Hunter, David J Breast Cancer Res Research Article INTRODUCTION: A younger age at menarche and an older age at menopause are well established risk factors for breast cancer. Recent genome-wide association studies have identified several novel genetic loci associated with these two traits. However, the association between these loci and breast cancer risk is unknown. METHODS: In this study, we investigated 19 and 17 newly identified single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) from the ReproGen Consortium that have been associated with age at menarche and age at natural menopause, respectively, and assessed their associations with breast cancer risk in 6 population-based studies among up to 3,683 breast cancer cases and 34,174 controls in white women of European ancestry. In addition, we used these SNPs to calculate genetic risk scores (GRSs) based on their associations with each trait. RESULTS: After adjusting for age and potential population stratification, two age at menarche associated SNPs (rs1079866 and rs7821178) and one age at natural menopause associated SNP (rs2517388) were associated with breast cancer risk (p values, 0.003, 0.009 and 0.023, respectively). The odds ratios for breast cancer corresponding to per-risk-allele were 1.14 (95% CI, 1.05 to 1.24), 1.08 (95% CI, 1.02 to 1.15) and 1.10 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.20), respectively, and were in the direction predicted by their associations with age at menarche or age at natural menopause. These associations did not appear to be attenuated by further controlling for self-reported age at menarche, age at natural menopause, or known breast cancer susceptibility loci. Although we did not observe a statistically significant association between any GRS for reproductive aging and breast cancer risk, the 4(th )and 5(th )highest quintiles of the younger age at menarche GRS had odds ratios of 1.14 (95% CI, 1.01 to 1.28) and 1.13 (95% CI, 1.00 to 1.27), respectively, compared to the lowest quintile. CONCLUSIONS: Our study suggests that three genetic variants, independent of their associations with age at menarche or age at natural menopause, were associated with breast cancer risk and may contribute modestly to breast cancer risk prediction; however, the combination of the 19 age at menarche or the 17 age at natural menopause associated SNPs did not appear to be useful for identifying a high risk subgroup for breast cancer. BioMed Central 2012 2012-03-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3446388/ /pubmed/22433456 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3155 Text en Copyright ©2011 He et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
He, Chunyan
Chasman, Daniel I
Dreyfus, Jill
Hwang, Shih-Jen
Ruiter, Rikje
Sanna, Serena
Buring, Julie E
Fernández-Rhodes, Lindsay
Franceschini, Nora
Hankinson, Susan E
Hofman, Albert
Lunetta, Kathryn L
Palmieri, Giuseppe
Porcu, Eleonora
Rivadeneira, Fernando
Rose, Lynda M
Splansky, Greta L
Stolk, Lisette
Uitterlinden, André G
Chanock, Stephen J
Crisponi, Laura
Demerath, Ellen W
Murabito, Joanne M
Ridker, Paul M
Stricker, Bruno H
Hunter, David J
Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
title Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
title_full Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
title_fullStr Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
title_short Reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
title_sort reproductive aging-associated common genetic variants and the risk of breast cancer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446388/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22433456
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/bcr3155
work_keys_str_mv AT hechunyan reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT chasmandanieli reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT dreyfusjill reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT hwangshihjen reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT ruiterrikje reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT sannaserena reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT buringjuliee reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT fernandezrhodeslindsay reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT franceschininora reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT hankinsonsusane reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT hofmanalbert reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT lunettakathrynl reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT palmierigiuseppe reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT porcueleonora reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT rivadeneirafernando reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT roselyndam reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT splanskygretal reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT stolklisette reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT uitterlindenandreg reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT chanockstephenj reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT crisponilaura reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT demerathellenw reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT murabitojoannem reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT ridkerpaulm reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT strickerbrunoh reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer
AT hunterdavidj reproductiveagingassociatedcommongeneticvariantsandtheriskofbreastcancer