Cargando…

Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses

Purpose. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods. Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Arnouk, René, Suzuki Bellucci, Carlos Henrique, Stull, Roberto Benatuil, de Bessa Junior, José, Malave, Cesar Augusto, Gomes, Cristiano Mendes
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Scientific World Journal 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/463574
_version_ 1782244004513972224
author Arnouk, René
Suzuki Bellucci, Carlos Henrique
Stull, Roberto Benatuil
de Bessa Junior, José
Malave, Cesar Augusto
Gomes, Cristiano Mendes
author_facet Arnouk, René
Suzuki Bellucci, Carlos Henrique
Stull, Roberto Benatuil
de Bessa Junior, José
Malave, Cesar Augusto
Gomes, Cristiano Mendes
author_sort Arnouk, René
collection PubMed
description Purpose. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods. Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of BoNT-A into the prostate. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), post-void residual volume (PVR), PSA levels and prostate volume before injection and after 3 and 6 months were evaluated. Adverse events were compared between the groups. Results. Thirty four patients were evaluated, including 17 in the BoNT-A 100 U group and 17 in the BoNT-A 200 U group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both doses produced significant improvements in IPSS, Q(max) and PVR after 3 and 6 months and both doses promoted comparable effects. Prostate volume was affected by 200 U BoNT-A injection only after 6 months of treatment. PSA levels were significantly affected in the 100 U group only after 6 months of treatment. In the 200 U group, PSA levels were significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months. The complication rate was similar in both groups. Conclusions. Efficacy and safety of both BoNT-A doses are similar for BPH treatment in the short term followup.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3446647
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher The Scientific World Journal
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34466472012-09-20 Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses Arnouk, René Suzuki Bellucci, Carlos Henrique Stull, Roberto Benatuil de Bessa Junior, José Malave, Cesar Augusto Gomes, Cristiano Mendes ScientificWorldJournal Clinical Study Purpose. To assess the efficacy and safety of intraprostatic injection of two botulinum neurotoxin type A (BoNT-A) doses for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Materials and Methods. Men with symptomatic BPH who failed medical treatment were randomized to receive 100 U or 200 U of BoNT-A into the prostate. The International Prostatic Symptom Score (IPSS), maximum flow rate (Q(max)), post-void residual volume (PVR), PSA levels and prostate volume before injection and after 3 and 6 months were evaluated. Adverse events were compared between the groups. Results. Thirty four patients were evaluated, including 17 in the BoNT-A 100 U group and 17 in the BoNT-A 200 U group. Baseline characteristics were similar in both groups. Both doses produced significant improvements in IPSS, Q(max) and PVR after 3 and 6 months and both doses promoted comparable effects. Prostate volume was affected by 200 U BoNT-A injection only after 6 months of treatment. PSA levels were significantly affected in the 100 U group only after 6 months of treatment. In the 200 U group, PSA levels were significantly decreased after 3 and 6 months. The complication rate was similar in both groups. Conclusions. Efficacy and safety of both BoNT-A doses are similar for BPH treatment in the short term followup. The Scientific World Journal 2012-09-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3446647/ /pubmed/22997495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/463574 Text en Copyright © 2012 René Arnouk et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Arnouk, René
Suzuki Bellucci, Carlos Henrique
Stull, Roberto Benatuil
de Bessa Junior, José
Malave, Cesar Augusto
Gomes, Cristiano Mendes
Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_full Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_fullStr Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_full_unstemmed Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_short Botulinum Neurotoxin Type A for the Treatment of Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia: Randomized Study Comparing Two Doses
title_sort botulinum neurotoxin type a for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia: randomized study comparing two doses
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446647/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1100/2012/463574
work_keys_str_mv AT arnoukrene botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT suzukibelluccicarloshenrique botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT stullrobertobenatuil botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT debessajuniorjose botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT malavecesaraugusto botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses
AT gomescristianomendes botulinumneurotoxintypeaforthetreatmentofbenignprostatichyperplasiarandomizedstudycomparingtwodoses