Cargando…

The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies

Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP). Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hohmann, Claudia, Ullrich, Isabella, Lauche, Romy, Choi, Kyung-Eun, Lüdtke, Rainer, Rolke, Roman, Cramer, Holger, Saha, Felix Joyonto, Rampp, Thomas, Michalsen, Andreas, Langhorst, Jost, Dobos, Gustav, Musial, Frauke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/753583
_version_ 1782244021390802944
author Hohmann, Claudia
Ullrich, Isabella
Lauche, Romy
Choi, Kyung-Eun
Lüdtke, Rainer
Rolke, Roman
Cramer, Holger
Saha, Felix Joyonto
Rampp, Thomas
Michalsen, Andreas
Langhorst, Jost
Dobos, Gustav
Musial, Frauke
author_facet Hohmann, Claudia
Ullrich, Isabella
Lauche, Romy
Choi, Kyung-Eun
Lüdtke, Rainer
Rolke, Roman
Cramer, Holger
Saha, Felix Joyonto
Rampp, Thomas
Michalsen, Andreas
Langhorst, Jost
Dobos, Gustav
Musial, Frauke
author_sort Hohmann, Claudia
collection PubMed
description Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP). Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomized to either treatment or waiting list control group. The treatment group self-administered a NSP over a period of 14 days. Pain ratings were recorded on numerical rating scales (NRSs). Mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were determined at the site of maximal pain and in the adjacent region, vibration detection thresholds (VDT) were measured at close spinal processes. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were utilized for the NP and BP study, respectively. Results. NRS ratings were significantly reduced for the treatment groups compared to the control groups (NP: P = .021 and BP: P < .001), accompanied by a significant increase of PPT at pain maximum (NP: P = .032 and BP: P = .013). There was no effect on VDT and MDT. The NPQ showed also a significant improvement, but not the ODI. Conclusions. The mechanical NSP seems to be an effective treatment method for chronic NP and BP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3446809
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34468092012-09-20 The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies Hohmann, Claudia Ullrich, Isabella Lauche, Romy Choi, Kyung-Eun Lüdtke, Rainer Rolke, Roman Cramer, Holger Saha, Felix Joyonto Rampp, Thomas Michalsen, Andreas Langhorst, Jost Dobos, Gustav Musial, Frauke Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP). Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomized to either treatment or waiting list control group. The treatment group self-administered a NSP over a period of 14 days. Pain ratings were recorded on numerical rating scales (NRSs). Mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were determined at the site of maximal pain and in the adjacent region, vibration detection thresholds (VDT) were measured at close spinal processes. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were utilized for the NP and BP study, respectively. Results. NRS ratings were significantly reduced for the treatment groups compared to the control groups (NP: P = .021 and BP: P < .001), accompanied by a significant increase of PPT at pain maximum (NP: P = .032 and BP: P = .013). There was no effect on VDT and MDT. The NPQ showed also a significant improvement, but not the ODI. Conclusions. The mechanical NSP seems to be an effective treatment method for chronic NP and BP. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3446809/ /pubmed/22997531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/753583 Text en Copyright © 2012 Claudia Hohmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hohmann, Claudia
Ullrich, Isabella
Lauche, Romy
Choi, Kyung-Eun
Lüdtke, Rainer
Rolke, Roman
Cramer, Holger
Saha, Felix Joyonto
Rampp, Thomas
Michalsen, Andreas
Langhorst, Jost
Dobos, Gustav
Musial, Frauke
The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
title The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
title_full The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
title_fullStr The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
title_full_unstemmed The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
title_short The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
title_sort benefit of a mechanical needle stimulation pad in patients with chronic neck and lower back pain: two randomized controlled pilot studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446809/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997531
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/753583
work_keys_str_mv AT hohmannclaudia thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT ullrichisabella thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT laucheromy thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT choikyungeun thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT ludtkerainer thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT rolkeroman thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT cramerholger thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT sahafelixjoyonto thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT ramppthomas thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT michalsenandreas thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT langhorstjost thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT dobosgustav thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT musialfrauke thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT hohmannclaudia benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT ullrichisabella benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT laucheromy benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT choikyungeun benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT ludtkerainer benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT rolkeroman benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT cramerholger benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT sahafelixjoyonto benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT ramppthomas benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT michalsenandreas benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT langhorstjost benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT dobosgustav benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies
AT musialfrauke benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies