Cargando…
The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies
Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP). Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/753583 |
_version_ | 1782244021390802944 |
---|---|
author | Hohmann, Claudia Ullrich, Isabella Lauche, Romy Choi, Kyung-Eun Lüdtke, Rainer Rolke, Roman Cramer, Holger Saha, Felix Joyonto Rampp, Thomas Michalsen, Andreas Langhorst, Jost Dobos, Gustav Musial, Frauke |
author_facet | Hohmann, Claudia Ullrich, Isabella Lauche, Romy Choi, Kyung-Eun Lüdtke, Rainer Rolke, Roman Cramer, Holger Saha, Felix Joyonto Rampp, Thomas Michalsen, Andreas Langhorst, Jost Dobos, Gustav Musial, Frauke |
author_sort | Hohmann, Claudia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP). Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomized to either treatment or waiting list control group. The treatment group self-administered a NSP over a period of 14 days. Pain ratings were recorded on numerical rating scales (NRSs). Mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were determined at the site of maximal pain and in the adjacent region, vibration detection thresholds (VDT) were measured at close spinal processes. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were utilized for the NP and BP study, respectively. Results. NRS ratings were significantly reduced for the treatment groups compared to the control groups (NP: P = .021 and BP: P < .001), accompanied by a significant increase of PPT at pain maximum (NP: P = .032 and BP: P = .013). There was no effect on VDT and MDT. The NPQ showed also a significant improvement, but not the ODI. Conclusions. The mechanical NSP seems to be an effective treatment method for chronic NP and BP. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3446809 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34468092012-09-20 The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies Hohmann, Claudia Ullrich, Isabella Lauche, Romy Choi, Kyung-Eun Lüdtke, Rainer Rolke, Roman Cramer, Holger Saha, Felix Joyonto Rampp, Thomas Michalsen, Andreas Langhorst, Jost Dobos, Gustav Musial, Frauke Evid Based Complement Alternat Med Research Article Objectives. The objective was to investigate whether a treatment with a needle stimulation pad (NSP) changes perceived pain and/or sensory thresholds in patients with chronic neck (NP) and lower back pain (BP). Methods. 40 patients with chronic NP and 42 patients with chronic BP were equally randomized to either treatment or waiting list control group. The treatment group self-administered a NSP over a period of 14 days. Pain ratings were recorded on numerical rating scales (NRSs). Mechanical detection thresholds (MDTs) and pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) were determined at the site of maximal pain and in the adjacent region, vibration detection thresholds (VDT) were measured at close spinal processes. The Northwick Park Neck Pain Questionnaire (NPQ) and the Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) were utilized for the NP and BP study, respectively. Results. NRS ratings were significantly reduced for the treatment groups compared to the control groups (NP: P = .021 and BP: P < .001), accompanied by a significant increase of PPT at pain maximum (NP: P = .032 and BP: P = .013). There was no effect on VDT and MDT. The NPQ showed also a significant improvement, but not the ODI. Conclusions. The mechanical NSP seems to be an effective treatment method for chronic NP and BP. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2012 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3446809/ /pubmed/22997531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/753583 Text en Copyright © 2012 Claudia Hohmann et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hohmann, Claudia Ullrich, Isabella Lauche, Romy Choi, Kyung-Eun Lüdtke, Rainer Rolke, Roman Cramer, Holger Saha, Felix Joyonto Rampp, Thomas Michalsen, Andreas Langhorst, Jost Dobos, Gustav Musial, Frauke The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies |
title | The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies |
title_full | The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies |
title_fullStr | The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies |
title_short | The Benefit of a Mechanical Needle Stimulation Pad in Patients with Chronic Neck and Lower Back Pain: Two Randomized Controlled Pilot Studies |
title_sort | benefit of a mechanical needle stimulation pad in patients with chronic neck and lower back pain: two randomized controlled pilot studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3446809/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22997531 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2012/753583 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hohmannclaudia thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT ullrichisabella thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT laucheromy thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT choikyungeun thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT ludtkerainer thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT rolkeroman thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT cramerholger thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT sahafelixjoyonto thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT ramppthomas thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT michalsenandreas thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT langhorstjost thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT dobosgustav thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT musialfrauke thebenefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT hohmannclaudia benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT ullrichisabella benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT laucheromy benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT choikyungeun benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT ludtkerainer benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT rolkeroman benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT cramerholger benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT sahafelixjoyonto benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT ramppthomas benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT michalsenandreas benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT langhorstjost benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT dobosgustav benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies AT musialfrauke benefitofamechanicalneedlestimulationpadinpatientswithchronicneckandlowerbackpaintworandomizedcontrolledpilotstudies |