Cargando…

Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR

BACKGROUND: Probe based detection assays form the mainstay of transcript quantification. Problems with these assays include varying hybridization efficiencies of the probes used for transcript quantification and the expense involved. We examined the ability of a standardized competitive RT-PCR (StaR...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pagliarulo, Vincenzo, George, Ben, Beil, Stephen J, Groshen, Susan, Laird, Peter W, Cai, Jie, Willey, James, Cote, Richard J, Datar, Ram H
Formato: Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2004
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC344741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14741054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-3-5
_version_ 1782121238071607296
author Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
George, Ben
Beil, Stephen J
Groshen, Susan
Laird, Peter W
Cai, Jie
Willey, James
Cote, Richard J
Datar, Ram H
author_facet Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
George, Ben
Beil, Stephen J
Groshen, Susan
Laird, Peter W
Cai, Jie
Willey, James
Cote, Richard J
Datar, Ram H
author_sort Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Probe based detection assays form the mainstay of transcript quantification. Problems with these assays include varying hybridization efficiencies of the probes used for transcript quantification and the expense involved. We examined the ability of a standardized competitive RT-PCR (StaRT PCR) assay to quantify transcripts of 4 cell cycle associated genes (RB, E2F1, CDKN2A and PCNA) in two cell lines (T24 & LD419) and compared its efficacy with the established Taqman real time quantitative RT-PCR assay. We also assessed the sensitivity, reproducibility and consistency of StaRT PCR. StaRT PCR assay is based on the incorporation of competitive templates (CT) in precisely standardized quantities along with the native template (NT) in a PCR reaction. This enables transcript quantification by comparing the NT and CT band intensities at the end of the PCR amplification. The CT serves as an ideal internal control. The transcript numbers are expressed as copies per million transcripts of a control gene such as β-actin (ACTB). RESULTS: The NT and CT were amplified at remarkably similar rates throughout the StaRT PCR amplification cycles, and the coefficient of variation was least (<3.8%) when the NT/CT ratio was kept as close to 1:1 as possible. The variability between the rates of amplification in different tubes subjected to the same StaRT PCR reaction was very low and within the range of experimental noise. Further, StaRT PCR was sensitive enough to detect variations as low as 10% in endogenous actin transcript quantity (p < 0.01 by the paired student's t-test). StaRT PCR correlated well with Taqman real time RT-PCR assay in terms of transcript quantification efficacy (p < 0.01 for all 4 genes by the Spearman Rank correlation method) and the ability to discriminate between cell types and confluence patterns. CONCLUSION: StaRT PCR is thus a reliable and sensitive technique that can be applied to medium-high throughput quantitative transcript measurement. Further, it correlates well with Taqman real time PCR in terms of quantitative and discriminatory ability. This label-free, inexpensive technique may provide the ability to generate prognostically important molecular signatures unique to individual tumors and may enable identification of novel therapeutic targets.
format Text
id pubmed-344741
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2004
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-3447412004-02-25 Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR Pagliarulo, Vincenzo George, Ben Beil, Stephen J Groshen, Susan Laird, Peter W Cai, Jie Willey, James Cote, Richard J Datar, Ram H Mol Cancer Research BACKGROUND: Probe based detection assays form the mainstay of transcript quantification. Problems with these assays include varying hybridization efficiencies of the probes used for transcript quantification and the expense involved. We examined the ability of a standardized competitive RT-PCR (StaRT PCR) assay to quantify transcripts of 4 cell cycle associated genes (RB, E2F1, CDKN2A and PCNA) in two cell lines (T24 & LD419) and compared its efficacy with the established Taqman real time quantitative RT-PCR assay. We also assessed the sensitivity, reproducibility and consistency of StaRT PCR. StaRT PCR assay is based on the incorporation of competitive templates (CT) in precisely standardized quantities along with the native template (NT) in a PCR reaction. This enables transcript quantification by comparing the NT and CT band intensities at the end of the PCR amplification. The CT serves as an ideal internal control. The transcript numbers are expressed as copies per million transcripts of a control gene such as β-actin (ACTB). RESULTS: The NT and CT were amplified at remarkably similar rates throughout the StaRT PCR amplification cycles, and the coefficient of variation was least (<3.8%) when the NT/CT ratio was kept as close to 1:1 as possible. The variability between the rates of amplification in different tubes subjected to the same StaRT PCR reaction was very low and within the range of experimental noise. Further, StaRT PCR was sensitive enough to detect variations as low as 10% in endogenous actin transcript quantity (p < 0.01 by the paired student's t-test). StaRT PCR correlated well with Taqman real time RT-PCR assay in terms of transcript quantification efficacy (p < 0.01 for all 4 genes by the Spearman Rank correlation method) and the ability to discriminate between cell types and confluence patterns. CONCLUSION: StaRT PCR is thus a reliable and sensitive technique that can be applied to medium-high throughput quantitative transcript measurement. Further, it correlates well with Taqman real time PCR in terms of quantitative and discriminatory ability. This label-free, inexpensive technique may provide the ability to generate prognostically important molecular signatures unique to individual tumors and may enable identification of novel therapeutic targets. BioMed Central 2004-01-23 /pmc/articles/PMC344741/ /pubmed/14741054 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-3-5 Text en Copyright © 2004 Pagliarulo et al; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL.
spellingShingle Research
Pagliarulo, Vincenzo
George, Ben
Beil, Stephen J
Groshen, Susan
Laird, Peter W
Cai, Jie
Willey, James
Cote, Richard J
Datar, Ram H
Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR
title Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_full Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_fullStr Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_full_unstemmed Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_short Sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive RT-PCR for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time RT-PCR
title_sort sensitivity and reproducibility of standardized-competitive rt-pcr for transcript quantification and its comparison with real time rt-pcr
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC344741/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14741054
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1476-4598-3-5
work_keys_str_mv AT pagliarulovincenzo sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT georgeben sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT beilstephenj sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT groshensusan sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT lairdpeterw sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT caijie sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT willeyjames sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT coterichardj sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr
AT datarramh sensitivityandreproducibilityofstandardizedcompetitivertpcrfortranscriptquantificationanditscomparisonwithrealtimertpcr