Cargando…
Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits compared with best supportive care plus placebo, irrespective of epidermal growth factor...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Dove Medical Press
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028234 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S31794 |
_version_ | 1782244103527858176 |
---|---|
author | Walleser, Silke Ray, Joshua Bischoff, Helge Vergnenègre, Alain Rosery, Hubertus Chouaid, Christos Heigener, David de Castro Carpeño, Javier Tiseo, Marcello Walzer, Stefan |
author_facet | Walleser, Silke Ray, Joshua Bischoff, Helge Vergnenègre, Alain Rosery, Hubertus Chouaid, Christos Heigener, David de Castro Carpeño, Javier Tiseo, Marcello Walzer, Stefan |
author_sort | Walleser, Silke |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits compared with best supportive care plus placebo, irrespective of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (SATURN trial). The cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib in the overall SATURN population has been assessed and published recently, but analyses according to EGFR mutation status have not been performed yet, which was the rationale for assessing the cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib specifically in EGFR wild-type metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: The incremental cost per life-year gained of first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in patients with EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC was assessed for five European countries (the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy) with an area-under-the-curve model consisting of three health states (progression-free survival, progressive disease, death). Log-logistic survival functions were fitted to Phase III patient-level data (SATURN) to model progression-free survival and overall survival. The first-line maintenance erlotinib therapy cost (modeled for time to treatment cessation), medication cost in later lines, and cost for the treatment of adverse events were included. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation (1000 iterations) were performed. RESULTS: According to the model simulations, first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC resulted in 4.57 months of life gained (17.82 months for erlotinib versus 13.24 months for best supportive care) and 1.14 months of life without progression gained (erlotinib 4.29 versus best supportive care 3.15), and incremental total costs of erlotinib from €7897 (UK) to €9580 (Germany). The corresponding mean incremental cost per life-year gained of erlotinib ranged between €20,711 (UK) and €25,124 (Germany). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: First-line erlotinib maintenance treatment is cost-effective compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC, irrespective of the country setting. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3447427 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Dove Medical Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34474272012-10-01 Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe Walleser, Silke Ray, Joshua Bischoff, Helge Vergnenègre, Alain Rosery, Hubertus Chouaid, Christos Heigener, David de Castro Carpeño, Javier Tiseo, Marcello Walzer, Stefan Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits compared with best supportive care plus placebo, irrespective of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (SATURN trial). The cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib in the overall SATURN population has been assessed and published recently, but analyses according to EGFR mutation status have not been performed yet, which was the rationale for assessing the cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib specifically in EGFR wild-type metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: The incremental cost per life-year gained of first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in patients with EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC was assessed for five European countries (the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy) with an area-under-the-curve model consisting of three health states (progression-free survival, progressive disease, death). Log-logistic survival functions were fitted to Phase III patient-level data (SATURN) to model progression-free survival and overall survival. The first-line maintenance erlotinib therapy cost (modeled for time to treatment cessation), medication cost in later lines, and cost for the treatment of adverse events were included. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation (1000 iterations) were performed. RESULTS: According to the model simulations, first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC resulted in 4.57 months of life gained (17.82 months for erlotinib versus 13.24 months for best supportive care) and 1.14 months of life without progression gained (erlotinib 4.29 versus best supportive care 3.15), and incremental total costs of erlotinib from €7897 (UK) to €9580 (Germany). The corresponding mean incremental cost per life-year gained of erlotinib ranged between €20,711 (UK) and €25,124 (Germany). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: First-line erlotinib maintenance treatment is cost-effective compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC, irrespective of the country setting. Dove Medical Press 2012-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3447427/ /pubmed/23028234 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S31794 Text en © 2012 Walleser et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Research Walleser, Silke Ray, Joshua Bischoff, Helge Vergnenègre, Alain Rosery, Hubertus Chouaid, Christos Heigener, David de Castro Carpeño, Javier Tiseo, Marcello Walzer, Stefan Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe |
title | Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe |
title_full | Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe |
title_fullStr | Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe |
title_full_unstemmed | Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe |
title_short | Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe |
title_sort | maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in egfr wild-type across europe |
topic | Original Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447427/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028234 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S31794 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wallesersilke maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT rayjoshua maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT bischoffhelge maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT vergnenegrealain maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT roseryhubertus maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT chouaidchristos maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT heigenerdavid maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT decastrocarpenojavier maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT tiseomarcello maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope AT walzerstefan maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope |