Cargando…

Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe

BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits compared with best supportive care plus placebo, irrespective of epidermal growth factor...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Walleser, Silke, Ray, Joshua, Bischoff, Helge, Vergnenègre, Alain, Rosery, Hubertus, Chouaid, Christos, Heigener, David, de Castro Carpeño, Javier, Tiseo, Marcello, Walzer, Stefan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Dove Medical Press 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028234
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S31794
_version_ 1782244103527858176
author Walleser, Silke
Ray, Joshua
Bischoff, Helge
Vergnenègre, Alain
Rosery, Hubertus
Chouaid, Christos
Heigener, David
de Castro Carpeño, Javier
Tiseo, Marcello
Walzer, Stefan
author_facet Walleser, Silke
Ray, Joshua
Bischoff, Helge
Vergnenègre, Alain
Rosery, Hubertus
Chouaid, Christos
Heigener, David
de Castro Carpeño, Javier
Tiseo, Marcello
Walzer, Stefan
author_sort Walleser, Silke
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits compared with best supportive care plus placebo, irrespective of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (SATURN trial). The cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib in the overall SATURN population has been assessed and published recently, but analyses according to EGFR mutation status have not been performed yet, which was the rationale for assessing the cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib specifically in EGFR wild-type metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: The incremental cost per life-year gained of first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in patients with EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC was assessed for five European countries (the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy) with an area-under-the-curve model consisting of three health states (progression-free survival, progressive disease, death). Log-logistic survival functions were fitted to Phase III patient-level data (SATURN) to model progression-free survival and overall survival. The first-line maintenance erlotinib therapy cost (modeled for time to treatment cessation), medication cost in later lines, and cost for the treatment of adverse events were included. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation (1000 iterations) were performed. RESULTS: According to the model simulations, first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC resulted in 4.57 months of life gained (17.82 months for erlotinib versus 13.24 months for best supportive care) and 1.14 months of life without progression gained (erlotinib 4.29 versus best supportive care 3.15), and incremental total costs of erlotinib from €7897 (UK) to €9580 (Germany). The corresponding mean incremental cost per life-year gained of erlotinib ranged between €20,711 (UK) and €25,124 (Germany). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: First-line erlotinib maintenance treatment is cost-effective compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC, irrespective of the country setting.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3447427
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34474272012-10-01 Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe Walleser, Silke Ray, Joshua Bischoff, Helge Vergnenègre, Alain Rosery, Hubertus Chouaid, Christos Heigener, David de Castro Carpeño, Javier Tiseo, Marcello Walzer, Stefan Clinicoecon Outcomes Res Original Research BACKGROUND: First-line maintenance erlotinib in patients with locally advanced or metastatic nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has demonstrated significant overall survival and progression-free survival benefits compared with best supportive care plus placebo, irrespective of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) status (SATURN trial). The cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib in the overall SATURN population has been assessed and published recently, but analyses according to EGFR mutation status have not been performed yet, which was the rationale for assessing the cost-effectiveness of first-line maintenance erlotinib specifically in EGFR wild-type metastatic NSCLC. METHODS: The incremental cost per life-year gained of first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in patients with EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC was assessed for five European countries (the United Kingdom, Germany, France, Spain, and Italy) with an area-under-the-curve model consisting of three health states (progression-free survival, progressive disease, death). Log-logistic survival functions were fitted to Phase III patient-level data (SATURN) to model progression-free survival and overall survival. The first-line maintenance erlotinib therapy cost (modeled for time to treatment cessation), medication cost in later lines, and cost for the treatment of adverse events were included. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses using Monte Carlo simulation (1000 iterations) were performed. RESULTS: According to the model simulations, first-line maintenance erlotinib compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC resulted in 4.57 months of life gained (17.82 months for erlotinib versus 13.24 months for best supportive care) and 1.14 months of life without progression gained (erlotinib 4.29 versus best supportive care 3.15), and incremental total costs of erlotinib from €7897 (UK) to €9580 (Germany). The corresponding mean incremental cost per life-year gained of erlotinib ranged between €20,711 (UK) and €25,124 (Germany). Sensitivity analyses confirmed these results. CONCLUSION: First-line erlotinib maintenance treatment is cost-effective compared with best supportive care in EGFR wild-type stable metastatic NSCLC, irrespective of the country setting. Dove Medical Press 2012-09-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3447427/ /pubmed/23028234 http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S31794 Text en © 2012 Walleser et al, publisher and licensee Dove Medical Press Ltd. This is an Open Access article which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Research
Walleser, Silke
Ray, Joshua
Bischoff, Helge
Vergnenègre, Alain
Rosery, Hubertus
Chouaid, Christos
Heigener, David
de Castro Carpeño, Javier
Tiseo, Marcello
Walzer, Stefan
Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
title Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
title_full Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
title_fullStr Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
title_full_unstemmed Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
title_short Maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in EGFR wild-type across Europe
title_sort maintenance erlotinib in advanced nonsmall cell lung cancer: cost-effectiveness in egfr wild-type across europe
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447427/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028234
http://dx.doi.org/10.2147/CEOR.S31794
work_keys_str_mv AT wallesersilke maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT rayjoshua maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT bischoffhelge maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT vergnenegrealain maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT roseryhubertus maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT chouaidchristos maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT heigenerdavid maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT decastrocarpenojavier maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT tiseomarcello maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope
AT walzerstefan maintenanceerlotinibinadvancednonsmallcelllungcancercosteffectivenessinegfrwildtypeacrosseurope