Cargando…

Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition

BACKGROUND: IUGR infants are thought to have impaired gut function after birth, which may result in intestinal disturbances, ranging from temporary intolerance to the enteral feeding to full-blown NEC. In literature there is no consensus regarding the impact of enteral feeding on intestinal blood fl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bozzetti, Valentina, Paterlini, Giuseppe, Meroni, Valeria, DeLorenzo, Paola, Gazzolo, Diego, Van Bel, Frank, Visser, Gerard HA, Valsecchi, MariaGrazia, Tagliabue, Paolo E
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-106
_version_ 1782244129586020352
author Bozzetti, Valentina
Paterlini, Giuseppe
Meroni, Valeria
DeLorenzo, Paola
Gazzolo, Diego
Van Bel, Frank
Visser, Gerard HA
Valsecchi, MariaGrazia
Tagliabue, Paolo E
author_facet Bozzetti, Valentina
Paterlini, Giuseppe
Meroni, Valeria
DeLorenzo, Paola
Gazzolo, Diego
Van Bel, Frank
Visser, Gerard HA
Valsecchi, MariaGrazia
Tagliabue, Paolo E
author_sort Bozzetti, Valentina
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: IUGR infants are thought to have impaired gut function after birth, which may result in intestinal disturbances, ranging from temporary intolerance to the enteral feeding to full-blown NEC. In literature there is no consensus regarding the impact of enteral feeding on intestinal blood flow and hence regarding the best regimen and the best rate of delivering the enteral nutrition. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized, non-pharmacological, single-center, cross-over study including 20 VLBW infants. Inclusion criteria * Weight at birth ranging: 700–1501 grams * Gestational age up to 25 weeks and 6 days * Written informed consent from parents or guardians Exclusion criteria * Major congenital abnormality * Patients enrolled in other trials * Significant multi-organ failure prior to trial entry * Pre-existing cutaneous disease not allowing the placement of the NIRS’ probe In the first 24 hours of life, between the 48(th) and 72(nd) hours of life, and during Minimal Enteral Feeding, all infants’ intestinal perfusion will be evaluated with NIRS and a Doppler of the superior mesenteric artery will be executed. At the achievement of an enteral intake of 100 mL/Kg/day the patients (IUGR and NON IUGR separately) will be randomized in 2 groups: Group A (n=10) will receive a feed by bolus (in 10 minutes); then, after at least 3 hours, they will receive the same amount of formula administered in 3 hours. Group B (n=10) will receive a feed administered in 3 hours followed by a bolus administration of the same amount of formula (in 10 minutes) after at least 3 hours. On the randomization day intestinal and cerebral regional oximetry will be measured via NIRS. Intestinal and celebral oximetry will be measured before the feed and 30 minutes after the feed by bolus during the 3 hours nutrition the measurements will be performed before the feed, 30 minutes from the start of the nutrition and 30 minutes after the end of the gavage. An evaluation of blood flow velocity of the superior mesenteric artery will be performed meanwhile. The infants of the Group A will be fed with continuous nutrition until the achievement of full enteral feeding. The infants of the Group B will be fed by bolus until the achievement of full enteral feeding. DISCUSSION: Evaluations of intestinal oximetry and superior mesenteric artery blood flow after the feed may help in differentiating how the feeding regimen alters the splanchnic blood flow and oxygenation and if the changes induced by feeding are different in IUGR versus NON IUGR infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01341236
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3447641
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34476412012-09-21 Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition Bozzetti, Valentina Paterlini, Giuseppe Meroni, Valeria DeLorenzo, Paola Gazzolo, Diego Van Bel, Frank Visser, Gerard HA Valsecchi, MariaGrazia Tagliabue, Paolo E BMC Pediatr Study Protocol BACKGROUND: IUGR infants are thought to have impaired gut function after birth, which may result in intestinal disturbances, ranging from temporary intolerance to the enteral feeding to full-blown NEC. In literature there is no consensus regarding the impact of enteral feeding on intestinal blood flow and hence regarding the best regimen and the best rate of delivering the enteral nutrition. METHODS/DESIGN: This is a randomized, non-pharmacological, single-center, cross-over study including 20 VLBW infants. Inclusion criteria * Weight at birth ranging: 700–1501 grams * Gestational age up to 25 weeks and 6 days * Written informed consent from parents or guardians Exclusion criteria * Major congenital abnormality * Patients enrolled in other trials * Significant multi-organ failure prior to trial entry * Pre-existing cutaneous disease not allowing the placement of the NIRS’ probe In the first 24 hours of life, between the 48(th) and 72(nd) hours of life, and during Minimal Enteral Feeding, all infants’ intestinal perfusion will be evaluated with NIRS and a Doppler of the superior mesenteric artery will be executed. At the achievement of an enteral intake of 100 mL/Kg/day the patients (IUGR and NON IUGR separately) will be randomized in 2 groups: Group A (n=10) will receive a feed by bolus (in 10 minutes); then, after at least 3 hours, they will receive the same amount of formula administered in 3 hours. Group B (n=10) will receive a feed administered in 3 hours followed by a bolus administration of the same amount of formula (in 10 minutes) after at least 3 hours. On the randomization day intestinal and cerebral regional oximetry will be measured via NIRS. Intestinal and celebral oximetry will be measured before the feed and 30 minutes after the feed by bolus during the 3 hours nutrition the measurements will be performed before the feed, 30 minutes from the start of the nutrition and 30 minutes after the end of the gavage. An evaluation of blood flow velocity of the superior mesenteric artery will be performed meanwhile. The infants of the Group A will be fed with continuous nutrition until the achievement of full enteral feeding. The infants of the Group B will be fed by bolus until the achievement of full enteral feeding. DISCUSSION: Evaluations of intestinal oximetry and superior mesenteric artery blood flow after the feed may help in differentiating how the feeding regimen alters the splanchnic blood flow and oxygenation and if the changes induced by feeding are different in IUGR versus NON IUGR infants. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT01341236 BioMed Central 2012-07-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3447641/ /pubmed/22828032 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-106 Text en Copyright ©2012 Bozzetti et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Study Protocol
Bozzetti, Valentina
Paterlini, Giuseppe
Meroni, Valeria
DeLorenzo, Paola
Gazzolo, Diego
Van Bel, Frank
Visser, Gerard HA
Valsecchi, MariaGrazia
Tagliabue, Paolo E
Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
title Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
title_full Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
title_fullStr Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
title_short Evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, Doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight IUGR and non-IUGR infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
title_sort evaluation of splanchnic oximetry, doppler flow velocimetry in the superior mesenteric artery and feeding tolerance in very low birth weight iugr and non-iugr infants receiving bolus versus continuous enteral nutrition
topic Study Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447641/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22828032
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2431-12-106
work_keys_str_mv AT bozzettivalentina evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT paterlinigiuseppe evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT meronivaleria evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT delorenzopaola evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT gazzolodiego evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT vanbelfrank evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT vissergerardha evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT valsecchimariagrazia evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition
AT tagliabuepaoloe evaluationofsplanchnicoximetrydopplerflowvelocimetryinthesuperiormesentericarteryandfeedingtoleranceinverylowbirthweightiugrandnoniugrinfantsreceivingbolusversuscontinuousenteralnutrition