Cargando…

A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK

BACKGROUND: In 2003–2004 and 2007–2008, the regulatory banning of SSRI use in pediatrics and young adults due to concerns regarding suicidality risk coincided with negative media coverage. SSRI use trends were analyzed from 2000–2010 in the Netherlands (NL) and the UK, and whether trend changes migh...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hernandez, Juan Francisco, Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K., van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W., Belitser, Svetlana V., Warmerdam, Jan, de Valk, Vincent, Raaijmakers, Jan A. M., Pieters, Toine
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045515
_version_ 1782244159609896960
author Hernandez, Juan Francisco
Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
Belitser, Svetlana V.
Warmerdam, Jan
de Valk, Vincent
Raaijmakers, Jan A. M.
Pieters, Toine
author_facet Hernandez, Juan Francisco
Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
Belitser, Svetlana V.
Warmerdam, Jan
de Valk, Vincent
Raaijmakers, Jan A. M.
Pieters, Toine
author_sort Hernandez, Juan Francisco
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In 2003–2004 and 2007–2008, the regulatory banning of SSRI use in pediatrics and young adults due to concerns regarding suicidality risk coincided with negative media coverage. SSRI use trends were analyzed from 2000–2010 in the Netherlands (NL) and the UK, and whether trend changes might be associated with media coverage of regulatory warnings. METHODS: Monthly SSRIs sales were presented as DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day. SSRI-use trends were studied using time-series segmented regression analyses. Timing of trend changes was compared with two periods of media coverage of warnings. Annual Dutch SSRI prescription data were analyzed by age group. RESULTS: Trend changes in SSRI use largely corroborated with the periods of media coverage of warnings. British SSRI use declined from 3.9 to 0.7 DDDs/month (95%CI 3.3;4.5 & 0.5;0.9, respectively) before the first warning period (2003–2004). A small decrease of −0.6 DDDs/month (−1.2; −0.05) was observed in Dutch SSRI use shortly after 2003–2004. From 2007–2008, British SSRI use stabilized, whilst Dutch SSRI use diminished to −0.04 DDDs/month (−0.4;0.3). Stratified analyses showed a rapid decrease of −1.2 DDDs/month (−2.1; −1.7) in UK paroxetine use before 2003–2004, but only a minimal change in Dutch paroxetine use (−0.3 DDDs/month −0.8;0.2). Other SSRI use, especially (es)citalopram, increased during 2003–2004 in both countries. Significant reductions in Dutch paroxetine use were observed in pediatrics, adolescents, and young adults after 2003–2004. CONCLUSION: Changes in SSRI use (NL & UK) were associated with the timing of the combined effect of media coverage and regulatory warnings. Our long-term assessment illustrates that changes in SSRI use were temporal, drug-specific and more pronounced in pediatrics and young adults. The twofold increase in SSRI use over one decade indicates that regulatory warnings and media coverage may come and go, but they do not have a significant impact on the overall upward trend of SSRI use as a class in both countries.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3447767
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34477672012-10-01 A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK Hernandez, Juan Francisco Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K. van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W. Belitser, Svetlana V. Warmerdam, Jan de Valk, Vincent Raaijmakers, Jan A. M. Pieters, Toine PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: In 2003–2004 and 2007–2008, the regulatory banning of SSRI use in pediatrics and young adults due to concerns regarding suicidality risk coincided with negative media coverage. SSRI use trends were analyzed from 2000–2010 in the Netherlands (NL) and the UK, and whether trend changes might be associated with media coverage of regulatory warnings. METHODS: Monthly SSRIs sales were presented as DDDs/1000 inhabitants/day. SSRI-use trends were studied using time-series segmented regression analyses. Timing of trend changes was compared with two periods of media coverage of warnings. Annual Dutch SSRI prescription data were analyzed by age group. RESULTS: Trend changes in SSRI use largely corroborated with the periods of media coverage of warnings. British SSRI use declined from 3.9 to 0.7 DDDs/month (95%CI 3.3;4.5 & 0.5;0.9, respectively) before the first warning period (2003–2004). A small decrease of −0.6 DDDs/month (−1.2; −0.05) was observed in Dutch SSRI use shortly after 2003–2004. From 2007–2008, British SSRI use stabilized, whilst Dutch SSRI use diminished to −0.04 DDDs/month (−0.4;0.3). Stratified analyses showed a rapid decrease of −1.2 DDDs/month (−2.1; −1.7) in UK paroxetine use before 2003–2004, but only a minimal change in Dutch paroxetine use (−0.3 DDDs/month −0.8;0.2). Other SSRI use, especially (es)citalopram, increased during 2003–2004 in both countries. Significant reductions in Dutch paroxetine use were observed in pediatrics, adolescents, and young adults after 2003–2004. CONCLUSION: Changes in SSRI use (NL & UK) were associated with the timing of the combined effect of media coverage and regulatory warnings. Our long-term assessment illustrates that changes in SSRI use were temporal, drug-specific and more pronounced in pediatrics and young adults. The twofold increase in SSRI use over one decade indicates that regulatory warnings and media coverage may come and go, but they do not have a significant impact on the overall upward trend of SSRI use as a class in both countries. Public Library of Science 2012-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3447767/ /pubmed/23029065 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045515 Text en © 2012 Hernandez et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hernandez, Juan Francisco
Mantel-Teeuwisse, Aukje K.
van Thiel, Ghislaine J. M. W.
Belitser, Svetlana V.
Warmerdam, Jan
de Valk, Vincent
Raaijmakers, Jan A. M.
Pieters, Toine
A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK
title A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK
title_full A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK
title_fullStr A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK
title_full_unstemmed A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK
title_short A 10-Year Analysis of the Effects of Media Coverage of Regulatory Warnings on Antidepressant Use in The Netherlands and UK
title_sort 10-year analysis of the effects of media coverage of regulatory warnings on antidepressant use in the netherlands and uk
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447767/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23029065
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0045515
work_keys_str_mv AT hernandezjuanfrancisco a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT mantelteeuwisseaukjek a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT vanthielghislainejmw a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT belitsersvetlanav a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT warmerdamjan a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT devalkvincent a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT raaijmakersjanam a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT pieterstoine a10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT hernandezjuanfrancisco 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT mantelteeuwisseaukjek 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT vanthielghislainejmw 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT belitsersvetlanav 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT warmerdamjan 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT devalkvincent 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT raaijmakersjanam 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk
AT pieterstoine 10yearanalysisoftheeffectsofmediacoverageofregulatorywarningsonantidepressantuseinthenetherlandsanduk