Cargando…

Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis

OBJECTIVE: To establish and compare the prognostic accuracy of immunologic and metabolic markers in predicting onset of type 1 diabetes in those with high risk in a prospective study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 339 subjects from the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) parenteral st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Xu, Ping, Beam, Craig A., Cuthbertson, David, Sosenko, Jay M., Skyler, Jay S., Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Diabetes Association 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787174
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0183
_version_ 1782244172918423552
author Xu, Ping
Beam, Craig A.
Cuthbertson, David
Sosenko, Jay M.
Skyler, Jay S.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
author_facet Xu, Ping
Beam, Craig A.
Cuthbertson, David
Sosenko, Jay M.
Skyler, Jay S.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
author_sort Xu, Ping
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To establish and compare the prognostic accuracy of immunologic and metabolic markers in predicting onset of type 1 diabetes in those with high risk in a prospective study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 339 subjects from the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) parenteral study, who were islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive, with low first-phase insulin response (FPIR) and/or abnormal glucose tolerance at baseline, were followed until clinical diabetes onset or study end (5-year follow-up). The prognostic performance of biomarkers was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with nonparametric testing of ROC curve areas. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between the markers. RESULTS: Individually, insulin autoantibody titer, ICA512A titer, peak C-peptide, 2-h glucose, FPIR, and FPIR/homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance provided modest but significant prognostic values for 5-year risk with a similar level of area under ROC curve ranging between 0.61 and 0.67. The combination of 2-h glucose, peak C-peptide, and area under the curve C-peptide significantly improved the prognostic accuracy compared with any solitary index (P < 0.05) with an area under ROC curve of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.81). The addition of antibody titers and/or intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) markers did not increase the prognostic accuracy further (P = 0.46 and P = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metabolic markers derived from the oral glucose tolerance test improved accuracy in predicting progression to type 1 diabetes in a population with ICA positivity and abnormal metabolism. The results indicate that the autoimmune activity may not alter the risk of type 1 diabetes after metabolic function has deteriorated. Future intervention trials may consider eliminating IVGTT measurements as an effective cost-reduction strategy for prognostic purposes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3447832
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher American Diabetes Association
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34478322013-10-01 Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis Xu, Ping Beam, Craig A. Cuthbertson, David Sosenko, Jay M. Skyler, Jay S. Krischer, Jeffrey P. Diabetes Care Original Research OBJECTIVE: To establish and compare the prognostic accuracy of immunologic and metabolic markers in predicting onset of type 1 diabetes in those with high risk in a prospective study. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: A total of 339 subjects from the Diabetes Prevention Trial–Type 1 (DPT-1) parenteral study, who were islet cell antibody (ICA)-positive, with low first-phase insulin response (FPIR) and/or abnormal glucose tolerance at baseline, were followed until clinical diabetes onset or study end (5-year follow-up). The prognostic performance of biomarkers was estimated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis and compared with nonparametric testing of ROC curve areas. Pearson correlation was used to assess the relationship between the markers. RESULTS: Individually, insulin autoantibody titer, ICA512A titer, peak C-peptide, 2-h glucose, FPIR, and FPIR/homeostasis model assessment of insulin resistance provided modest but significant prognostic values for 5-year risk with a similar level of area under ROC curve ranging between 0.61 and 0.67. The combination of 2-h glucose, peak C-peptide, and area under the curve C-peptide significantly improved the prognostic accuracy compared with any solitary index (P < 0.05) with an area under ROC curve of 0.76 (95% CI 0.70–0.81). The addition of antibody titers and/or intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT) markers did not increase the prognostic accuracy further (P = 0.46 and P = 0.66, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: The combination of metabolic markers derived from the oral glucose tolerance test improved accuracy in predicting progression to type 1 diabetes in a population with ICA positivity and abnormal metabolism. The results indicate that the autoimmune activity may not alter the risk of type 1 diabetes after metabolic function has deteriorated. Future intervention trials may consider eliminating IVGTT measurements as an effective cost-reduction strategy for prognostic purposes. American Diabetes Association 2012-10 2012-09-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3447832/ /pubmed/22787174 http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0183 Text en © 2012 by the American Diabetes Association. Readers may use this article as long as the work is properly cited, the use is educational and not for profit, and the work is not altered. See http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/ for details.
spellingShingle Original Research
Xu, Ping
Beam, Craig A.
Cuthbertson, David
Sosenko, Jay M.
Skyler, Jay S.
Krischer, Jeffrey P.
Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis
title Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_full Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_fullStr Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_short Prognostic Accuracy of Immunologic and Metabolic Markers for Type 1 Diabetes in a High-Risk Population: Receiver operating characteristic analysis
title_sort prognostic accuracy of immunologic and metabolic markers for type 1 diabetes in a high-risk population: receiver operating characteristic analysis
topic Original Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447832/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22787174
http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc12-0183
work_keys_str_mv AT xuping prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT beamcraiga prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT cuthbertsondavid prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT sosenkojaym prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT skylerjays prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT krischerjeffreyp prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis
AT prognosticaccuracyofimmunologicandmetabolicmarkersfortype1diabetesinahighriskpopulationreceiveroperatingcharacteristicanalysis