Cargando…

Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer

Capillary blood sampling has been identified as a potentially suitable technique for use in diagnostic testing of the full blood count (FBC) at the point-of-care (POC), for which a recent need has been highlighted. In this study we assess the accuracy of capillary blood counts and evaluate the poten...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hollis, Veronica S., Holloway, Judith A., Harris, Scott, Spencer, Daniel, van Berkel, Cees, Morgan, Hywel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043702
_version_ 1782244183080173568
author Hollis, Veronica S.
Holloway, Judith A.
Harris, Scott
Spencer, Daniel
van Berkel, Cees
Morgan, Hywel
author_facet Hollis, Veronica S.
Holloway, Judith A.
Harris, Scott
Spencer, Daniel
van Berkel, Cees
Morgan, Hywel
author_sort Hollis, Veronica S.
collection PubMed
description Capillary blood sampling has been identified as a potentially suitable technique for use in diagnostic testing of the full blood count (FBC) at the point-of-care (POC), for which a recent need has been highlighted. In this study we assess the accuracy of capillary blood counts and evaluate the potential of a miniaturized cytometer developed for POC testing. Differential leukocyte counts in the normal clinical range from fingerprick (capillary) and venous blood samples were measured and compared using a standard hematology analyzer. The accuracy of our novel microfluidic impedance cytometer (MIC) was then tested by comparing same-site measurements to those obtained with the standard analyzer. The concordance between measurements of fingerprick and venous blood samples using the standard hematology analyzer was high, with no clinically relevant differences observed between the mean differential leukocyte counts. Concordance data between the MIC and the standard analyzer on same-site measurements presented significantly lower leukocyte counts determined by the MIC. This systematic undercount was consistent across the measured (normal) concentration range, suggesting that an internal correction factor could be applied. Differential leukocyte counts obtained from fingerprick samples accurately reflect those from venous blood, which confirms the potential of capillary blood sampling for POC testing of the FBC. Furthermore, the MIC device demonstrated here presents a realistic technology for the future development of FBC and related tests for use at the site of patient care.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3447872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34478722012-10-01 Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer Hollis, Veronica S. Holloway, Judith A. Harris, Scott Spencer, Daniel van Berkel, Cees Morgan, Hywel PLoS One Research Article Capillary blood sampling has been identified as a potentially suitable technique for use in diagnostic testing of the full blood count (FBC) at the point-of-care (POC), for which a recent need has been highlighted. In this study we assess the accuracy of capillary blood counts and evaluate the potential of a miniaturized cytometer developed for POC testing. Differential leukocyte counts in the normal clinical range from fingerprick (capillary) and venous blood samples were measured and compared using a standard hematology analyzer. The accuracy of our novel microfluidic impedance cytometer (MIC) was then tested by comparing same-site measurements to those obtained with the standard analyzer. The concordance between measurements of fingerprick and venous blood samples using the standard hematology analyzer was high, with no clinically relevant differences observed between the mean differential leukocyte counts. Concordance data between the MIC and the standard analyzer on same-site measurements presented significantly lower leukocyte counts determined by the MIC. This systematic undercount was consistent across the measured (normal) concentration range, suggesting that an internal correction factor could be applied. Differential leukocyte counts obtained from fingerprick samples accurately reflect those from venous blood, which confirms the potential of capillary blood sampling for POC testing of the FBC. Furthermore, the MIC device demonstrated here presents a realistic technology for the future development of FBC and related tests for use at the site of patient care. Public Library of Science 2012-09-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3447872/ /pubmed/23028467 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043702 Text en © 2012 Hollis et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Hollis, Veronica S.
Holloway, Judith A.
Harris, Scott
Spencer, Daniel
van Berkel, Cees
Morgan, Hywel
Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer
title Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer
title_full Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer
title_fullStr Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer
title_short Comparison of Venous and Capillary Differential Leukocyte Counts Using a Standard Hematology Analyzer and a Novel Microfluidic Impedance Cytometer
title_sort comparison of venous and capillary differential leukocyte counts using a standard hematology analyzer and a novel microfluidic impedance cytometer
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3447872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23028467
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0043702
work_keys_str_mv AT hollisveronicas comparisonofvenousandcapillarydifferentialleukocytecountsusingastandardhematologyanalyzerandanovelmicrofluidicimpedancecytometer
AT hollowayjuditha comparisonofvenousandcapillarydifferentialleukocytecountsusingastandardhematologyanalyzerandanovelmicrofluidicimpedancecytometer
AT harrisscott comparisonofvenousandcapillarydifferentialleukocytecountsusingastandardhematologyanalyzerandanovelmicrofluidicimpedancecytometer
AT spencerdaniel comparisonofvenousandcapillarydifferentialleukocytecountsusingastandardhematologyanalyzerandanovelmicrofluidicimpedancecytometer
AT vanberkelcees comparisonofvenousandcapillarydifferentialleukocytecountsusingastandardhematologyanalyzerandanovelmicrofluidicimpedancecytometer
AT morganhywel comparisonofvenousandcapillarydifferentialleukocytecountsusingastandardhematologyanalyzerandanovelmicrofluidicimpedancecytometer