Cargando…

The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey

Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. Any possible associations between pulp stones and gender, tooth type and dental arch were also evaluated. Study Design: Four hundred and sixty nine patients’ bitewing radiographs...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sisman, Yıldıray, Aktan, Ali M., Tarım-Ertas, Elif, Çiftçi, Mehmet E., Şekerci, Ahmet E.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medicina Oral S.L. 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143688
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17400
_version_ 1782244245092958208
author Sisman, Yıldıray
Aktan, Ali M.
Tarım-Ertas, Elif
Çiftçi, Mehmet E.
Şekerci, Ahmet E.
author_facet Sisman, Yıldıray
Aktan, Ali M.
Tarım-Ertas, Elif
Çiftçi, Mehmet E.
Şekerci, Ahmet E.
author_sort Sisman, Yıldıray
collection PubMed
description Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. Any possible associations between pulp stones and gender, tooth type and dental arch were also evaluated. Study Design: Four hundred and sixty nine patients’ bitewing radiographs which were reached through the patient database of Erciyes University Dentistry School, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology were examined. Of these 469 subjects whose mean age was 24( ± 10.7), 302 were females and 167 were males. A total of 6,926 teeth were examined during this study. Pulp stones were recorded as present or absent and any relations with gender, tooth type and dental arch were noted. Results: Pulp stones were identified in 270 (57.6 %) of the subjects and in 1,038 (15 %) of the teeth examined. Their presence were seldom found in the premolars (9.07%) but was much higher in the molars (90.92 %). Pulp stone occurrence was significantly more common in the first molars than in the second molars, and in the first premolars than in the second premolars in each dental arch. Their occurrence was higher in the maxilla than in the mandible for each tooth type. No difference between the two genders could be identified. Conclusion: Pulp stones are not only incidental radiographic findings of the pulp tissue but may also be an indicator of some serious underlying disease. On the other hand, they may provide useful information to predict about the susceptibility of patients for other dystrophic soft tissue calcifications such as urinary calculi and calcified atheromas. However, further study on this issue is needed. Key words: Prevalence, pulp stone, Turkish population.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3448315
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Medicina Oral S.L.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34483152012-10-11 The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey Sisman, Yıldıray Aktan, Ali M. Tarım-Ertas, Elif Çiftçi, Mehmet E. Şekerci, Ahmet E. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal Research-Article Objectives: The goal of this retrospective study was to determine the prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. Any possible associations between pulp stones and gender, tooth type and dental arch were also evaluated. Study Design: Four hundred and sixty nine patients’ bitewing radiographs which were reached through the patient database of Erciyes University Dentistry School, Department of Oral Diagnosis and Radiology were examined. Of these 469 subjects whose mean age was 24( ± 10.7), 302 were females and 167 were males. A total of 6,926 teeth were examined during this study. Pulp stones were recorded as present or absent and any relations with gender, tooth type and dental arch were noted. Results: Pulp stones were identified in 270 (57.6 %) of the subjects and in 1,038 (15 %) of the teeth examined. Their presence were seldom found in the premolars (9.07%) but was much higher in the molars (90.92 %). Pulp stone occurrence was significantly more common in the first molars than in the second molars, and in the first premolars than in the second premolars in each dental arch. Their occurrence was higher in the maxilla than in the mandible for each tooth type. No difference between the two genders could be identified. Conclusion: Pulp stones are not only incidental radiographic findings of the pulp tissue but may also be an indicator of some serious underlying disease. On the other hand, they may provide useful information to predict about the susceptibility of patients for other dystrophic soft tissue calcifications such as urinary calculi and calcified atheromas. However, further study on this issue is needed. Key words: Prevalence, pulp stone, Turkish population. Medicina Oral S.L. 2012-03 2011-12-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3448315/ /pubmed/22143688 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17400 Text en Copyright: © 2012 Medicina Oral S.L. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.5/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research-Article
Sisman, Yıldıray
Aktan, Ali M.
Tarım-Ertas, Elif
Çiftçi, Mehmet E.
Şekerci, Ahmet E.
The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey
title The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey
title_full The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey
title_fullStr The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey
title_full_unstemmed The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey
title_short The prevalence of pulp stones in a Turkish population. A radiographic survey
title_sort prevalence of pulp stones in a turkish population. a radiographic survey
topic Research-Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448315/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143688
http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17400
work_keys_str_mv AT sismanyıldıray theprevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT aktanalim theprevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT tarımertaselif theprevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT ciftcimehmete theprevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT sekerciahmete theprevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT sismanyıldıray prevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT aktanalim prevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT tarımertaselif prevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT ciftcimehmete prevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey
AT sekerciahmete prevalenceofpulpstonesinaturkishpopulationaradiographicsurvey