Cargando…
A prospective, randomized, triple-blind comparison of articaine and bupivacaine for maxillary infiltrations
Objectives: To compare the clinical anesthetic efficacy of 0.5% bupivacaine and 4% articaine (both with 1:200.000 adrenaline) for anterior maxillary infiltration in healthy volunteers. Material and methods: A triple-blind split-mouth randomized clinical trial was carried out in 20 volunteers. A supr...
Autores principales: | Vílchez-Pérez, Miguel A., Sancho-Puchades, Manuel, Valmaseda-Castellón, Eduard, Paredes-García, Jordi, Berini-Aytés, Leonardo, Gay-Escoda, Cosme |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medicina Oral S.L.
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22143708 http://dx.doi.org/10.4317/medoral.17476 |
Ejemplares similares
-
Bupivacaine 0.5 % versus articaine 4 % for the removal of lower
third molars. A crossover randomized controlled trial
por: Sancho-Puchades, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Quality of life following third molar removal under conscious sedation
por: Sancho-Puchades, Manuel, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Sensibility and taste alterations after impacted lower third
molar extractions. A prospective cohort study
por: Ridaura-Ruiz, Lourdes, et al.
Publicado: (2012) -
Sharp mandibular bone irregularities after lower third molar
extraction: Incidence, clinical features and risk factors
por: Alves-Pereira, Daniela, et al.
Publicado: (2013) -
Anesthetic efficacy of Oraqix® versus Hurricaine® and placebo
for pain control during non-surgical periodontal treatment
por: Mayor-Subirana, Gemma, et al.
Publicado: (2014)