Cargando…

Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom

BACKGROUND: Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) has a malignant potential. Therapeutic options for OED remain both limited and without good evidence. Despite surgery being the most common method of treating OED, recurrence and potentially significant morbidity remain problematic. Consequently, there has...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nankivell, Paul, Dunn, Janet, Langman, Michael, Mehanna, Hisham
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22731119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-40
_version_ 1782244260164141056
author Nankivell, Paul
Dunn, Janet
Langman, Michael
Mehanna, Hisham
author_facet Nankivell, Paul
Dunn, Janet
Langman, Michael
Mehanna, Hisham
author_sort Nankivell, Paul
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) has a malignant potential. Therapeutic options for OED remain both limited and without good evidence. Despite surgery being the most common method of treating OED, recurrence and potentially significant morbidity remain problematic. Consequently, there has been much interest in non-surgical treatments for OED. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) up-regulation is known to occur in the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence and evidence now exists that COX-2 is a prognostic marker of malignant transformation in OED. COX-inhibitors are therefore considered a potential therapeutic strategy for treating this condition. We aimed to provide both proof of principal evidence supporting the effect of topical COX inhibition, and determine the feasibility of recruitment to an OED chemoprevention trial in the UK. METHODS: Recruitment of 40 patients with oral leukoplakia to 4 study arms was planned. The total daily dose of Aspirin would increase in each group and be used in the period between initial diagnostic and follow-up biopsies. RESULTS: During the 15-month recruitment period, 15/50 screened patients were eligible for recruitment, and 13 (87%) consented. Only 1 had OED diagnosed on biopsy. 16 patients were intolerant of, or already taking Aspirin and 16 patients required no biopsy. Initial recruitment was slow, as detection relied on clinicians identifying potentially eligible patients. Pre-screening new patient letters and directly contacting patients listed for biopsies improved screening of potentially eligible patients. However, as the incidence of OED was so low, it had little impact on trial recruitment. The trial was terminated, as recruitment was unlikely to be achieved in a single centre. CONCLUSION: This feasibility trial has demonstrated the low incidence of OED in the UK and the difficulties in conducting a study because of this. With an incidence of around 1.5/100,000/year and a high proportion of those patients already taking or intolerant of Aspirin, a large multi-centred trial would be required to fulfil the recruitment for this study. The ability of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to modify COX and prostaglandin expression remains an important but unanswered question. Collaboration with centres in other parts of the world with higher incidences of the disease may be required to ensure adequate recruitment. ISRCTN: 31503555.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3448506
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34485062012-09-22 Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom Nankivell, Paul Dunn, Janet Langman, Michael Mehanna, Hisham Head Neck Oncol Research BACKGROUND: Oral epithelial dysplasia (OED) has a malignant potential. Therapeutic options for OED remain both limited and without good evidence. Despite surgery being the most common method of treating OED, recurrence and potentially significant morbidity remain problematic. Consequently, there has been much interest in non-surgical treatments for OED. Cyclo-oxygenase (COX) up-regulation is known to occur in the dysplasia-carcinoma sequence and evidence now exists that COX-2 is a prognostic marker of malignant transformation in OED. COX-inhibitors are therefore considered a potential therapeutic strategy for treating this condition. We aimed to provide both proof of principal evidence supporting the effect of topical COX inhibition, and determine the feasibility of recruitment to an OED chemoprevention trial in the UK. METHODS: Recruitment of 40 patients with oral leukoplakia to 4 study arms was planned. The total daily dose of Aspirin would increase in each group and be used in the period between initial diagnostic and follow-up biopsies. RESULTS: During the 15-month recruitment period, 15/50 screened patients were eligible for recruitment, and 13 (87%) consented. Only 1 had OED diagnosed on biopsy. 16 patients were intolerant of, or already taking Aspirin and 16 patients required no biopsy. Initial recruitment was slow, as detection relied on clinicians identifying potentially eligible patients. Pre-screening new patient letters and directly contacting patients listed for biopsies improved screening of potentially eligible patients. However, as the incidence of OED was so low, it had little impact on trial recruitment. The trial was terminated, as recruitment was unlikely to be achieved in a single centre. CONCLUSION: This feasibility trial has demonstrated the low incidence of OED in the UK and the difficulties in conducting a study because of this. With an incidence of around 1.5/100,000/year and a high proportion of those patients already taking or intolerant of Aspirin, a large multi-centred trial would be required to fulfil the recruitment for this study. The ability of topical non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs to modify COX and prostaglandin expression remains an important but unanswered question. Collaboration with centres in other parts of the world with higher incidences of the disease may be required to ensure adequate recruitment. ISRCTN: 31503555. BioMed Central 2012-06-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3448506/ /pubmed/22731119 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-40 Text en Copyright © 2012 Nankivell et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research
Nankivell, Paul
Dunn, Janet
Langman, Michael
Mehanna, Hisham
Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom
title Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom
title_full Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom
title_fullStr Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom
title_short Feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the United Kingdom
title_sort feasibility of recruitment to an oral dysplasia trial in the united kingdom
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3448506/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22731119
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1758-3284-4-40
work_keys_str_mv AT nankivellpaul feasibilityofrecruitmenttoanoraldysplasiatrialintheunitedkingdom
AT dunnjanet feasibilityofrecruitmenttoanoraldysplasiatrialintheunitedkingdom
AT langmanmichael feasibilityofrecruitmenttoanoraldysplasiatrialintheunitedkingdom
AT mehannahisham feasibilityofrecruitmenttoanoraldysplasiatrialintheunitedkingdom