Cargando…

MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study

The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTN...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Carpena, Núria, Roselló-Lletí, Esther, Calabuig, Jose R., Tarazón, Estefanía, González-Juanatey, Jose R., Martínez-Dolz, Luis, Salvador, Antonio, Grigorian, Lilian, Orosa, Plácido, Portolés, Manuel, Rivera, Miguel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: International Scholarly Research Network 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008783
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894
_version_ 1782244310313336832
author Carpena, Núria
Roselló-Lletí, Esther
Calabuig, Jose R.
Tarazón, Estefanía
González-Juanatey, Jose R.
Martínez-Dolz, Luis
Salvador, Antonio
Grigorian, Lilian
Orosa, Plácido
Portolés, Manuel
Rivera, Miguel
author_facet Carpena, Núria
Roselló-Lletí, Esther
Calabuig, Jose R.
Tarazón, Estefanía
González-Juanatey, Jose R.
Martínez-Dolz, Luis
Salvador, Antonio
Grigorian, Lilian
Orosa, Plácido
Portolés, Manuel
Rivera, Miguel
author_sort Carpena, Núria
collection PubMed
description The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3449115
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher International Scholarly Research Network
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34491152012-09-24 MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study Carpena, Núria Roselló-Lletí, Esther Calabuig, Jose R. Tarazón, Estefanía González-Juanatey, Jose R. Martínez-Dolz, Luis Salvador, Antonio Grigorian, Lilian Orosa, Plácido Portolés, Manuel Rivera, Miguel ISRN Cardiol Research Article The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3449115/ /pubmed/23008783 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894 Text en Copyright © 2012 Núria Carpena et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Carpena, Núria
Roselló-Lletí, Esther
Calabuig, Jose R.
Tarazón, Estefanía
González-Juanatey, Jose R.
Martínez-Dolz, Luis
Salvador, Antonio
Grigorian, Lilian
Orosa, Plácido
Portolés, Manuel
Rivera, Miguel
MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
title MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
title_fullStr MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
title_full_unstemmed MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
title_short MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
title_sort mmp-2 and stnf-r1 variability in patients with essential hypertension: 1-year follow-up study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449115/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008783
http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894
work_keys_str_mv AT carpenanuria mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT rosellolletiesther mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT calabuigjoser mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT tarazonestefania mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT gonzalezjuanateyjoser mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT martinezdolzluis mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT salvadorantonio mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT grigorianlilian mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT orosaplacido mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT portolesmanuel mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy
AT riveramiguel mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy