Cargando…
MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study
The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTN...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scholarly Research Network
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008783 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894 |
_version_ | 1782244310313336832 |
---|---|
author | Carpena, Núria Roselló-Lletí, Esther Calabuig, Jose R. Tarazón, Estefanía González-Juanatey, Jose R. Martínez-Dolz, Luis Salvador, Antonio Grigorian, Lilian Orosa, Plácido Portolés, Manuel Rivera, Miguel |
author_facet | Carpena, Núria Roselló-Lletí, Esther Calabuig, Jose R. Tarazón, Estefanía González-Juanatey, Jose R. Martínez-Dolz, Luis Salvador, Antonio Grigorian, Lilian Orosa, Plácido Portolés, Manuel Rivera, Miguel |
author_sort | Carpena, Núria |
collection | PubMed |
description | The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3449115 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | International Scholarly Research Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34491152012-09-24 MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study Carpena, Núria Roselló-Lletí, Esther Calabuig, Jose R. Tarazón, Estefanía González-Juanatey, Jose R. Martínez-Dolz, Luis Salvador, Antonio Grigorian, Lilian Orosa, Plácido Portolés, Manuel Rivera, Miguel ISRN Cardiol Research Article The aim of this study is to analyze MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 variability, potent predictors of cardiovascular events, in stable hypertensive patients during a 12-month followup. 234 asymptomatic patients (age 60 ± 13, 136 male) out of 252 patients with essential hypertension were followed up. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 were measured at baseline and after 12 months (stage I). To compare MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels over time interval, we used the statistical method of Bland-Altman. MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 reproducibility was good in our patients for the two intervals with a coefficient of reproducibility of 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively. The percentages of patients within 1.96 × standard deviation of the mean were 93.6% and 92.7%. An elevated coefficient of correlation was obtained for MMP-2, basal versus stage I (r = 0.55, P < 0.0001) and for sTNF-R1 (r = 0.75, P < 0.0001). There is good stability in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels in a followup study of patients with stable hypertension. As a consequence, assessment of its concentrations may be a useful tool for monitoring the follow-up of these patients. Measured variations in MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 levels, exceeding 8.2% and 11.3%, respectively, may indicate an increase in cardiovascular risk, thus, could be used to optimizing treatment than blood pressure control alone. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3449115/ /pubmed/23008783 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894 Text en Copyright © 2012 Núria Carpena et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Carpena, Núria Roselló-Lletí, Esther Calabuig, Jose R. Tarazón, Estefanía González-Juanatey, Jose R. Martínez-Dolz, Luis Salvador, Antonio Grigorian, Lilian Orosa, Plácido Portolés, Manuel Rivera, Miguel MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
title | MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_full | MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_fullStr | MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_full_unstemmed | MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_short | MMP-2 and sTNF-R1 Variability in Patients with Essential Hypertension: 1-Year Follow-Up Study |
title_sort | mmp-2 and stnf-r1 variability in patients with essential hypertension: 1-year follow-up study |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449115/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008783 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/501894 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT carpenanuria mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT rosellolletiesther mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT calabuigjoser mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT tarazonestefania mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT gonzalezjuanateyjoser mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT martinezdolzluis mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT salvadorantonio mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT grigorianlilian mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT orosaplacido mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT portolesmanuel mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy AT riveramiguel mmp2andstnfr1variabilityinpatientswithessentialhypertension1yearfollowupstudy |