Cargando…
Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images
Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of two conventional cements (Zinc Cement and Ketac Cem Easymix), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2) and six resin cements (Multilink, Bistite II DC, RelyX ARC, Fill Magic Dual Cement, Enforce and Panavia F) by dig...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scholarly Research Network
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008777 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/704246 |
_version_ | 1782244311677534208 |
---|---|
author | Reis, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Jorge, Érica Gouveia Ribeiro, João Gustavo Rabelo Pinelli, Ligia Antunes Pereira Abi-Rached, Filipe de Oliveira Tanomaru-Filho, Mário |
author_facet | Reis, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Jorge, Érica Gouveia Ribeiro, João Gustavo Rabelo Pinelli, Ligia Antunes Pereira Abi-Rached, Filipe de Oliveira Tanomaru-Filho, Mário |
author_sort | Reis, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of two conventional cements (Zinc Cement and Ketac Cem Easymix), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2) and six resin cements (Multilink, Bistite II DC, RelyX ARC, Fill Magic Dual Cement, Enforce and Panavia F) by digitization of images. Methods. Five disc-shaped specimens (10 × 1.0 mm) were made for each material, according to ISO 4049. After setting of the cements, radiographs were made using occlusal films and a graduated aluminum stepwedge varying from 1.0 to 16 mm in thickness. The radiographs were digitized, and the radiopacity of the cements was compared with the aluminum stepwedge using the software VIXWIN-2000. Data (mmAl) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results. The Zinc Cement was the most radiopaque material tested (P < 0.05). The resin cements presented higher radiopacity (P < 0.05) than the conventional (Ketac Cem Easymix) or resin-modified glass ionomer (RelyX Luting 2) cements, except for the Fill Magic Dual Cement and Enforce. The Multilink presented the highest radiopacity (P < 0.05) among the resin cements. Conclusion. The glass ionomer-based cements (Ketac Cem Easymix and RelyX Luting 2) and the resin cements (Fill Magic Dual Cement and Enforce) showed lower radiopacity values than the minimum recommended by the ISO standard. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3449120 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | International Scholarly Research Network |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-34491202012-09-24 Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images Reis, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Jorge, Érica Gouveia Ribeiro, João Gustavo Rabelo Pinelli, Ligia Antunes Pereira Abi-Rached, Filipe de Oliveira Tanomaru-Filho, Mário ISRN Dent Research Article Objective. The aim of this study was to evaluate the radiopacity of two conventional cements (Zinc Cement and Ketac Cem Easymix), one resin-modified glass ionomer cement (RelyX Luting 2) and six resin cements (Multilink, Bistite II DC, RelyX ARC, Fill Magic Dual Cement, Enforce and Panavia F) by digitization of images. Methods. Five disc-shaped specimens (10 × 1.0 mm) were made for each material, according to ISO 4049. After setting of the cements, radiographs were made using occlusal films and a graduated aluminum stepwedge varying from 1.0 to 16 mm in thickness. The radiographs were digitized, and the radiopacity of the cements was compared with the aluminum stepwedge using the software VIXWIN-2000. Data (mmAl) were submitted to one-way ANOVA and Tukey's test (α = 0.05). Results. The Zinc Cement was the most radiopaque material tested (P < 0.05). The resin cements presented higher radiopacity (P < 0.05) than the conventional (Ketac Cem Easymix) or resin-modified glass ionomer (RelyX Luting 2) cements, except for the Fill Magic Dual Cement and Enforce. The Multilink presented the highest radiopacity (P < 0.05) among the resin cements. Conclusion. The glass ionomer-based cements (Ketac Cem Easymix and RelyX Luting 2) and the resin cements (Fill Magic Dual Cement and Enforce) showed lower radiopacity values than the minimum recommended by the ISO standard. International Scholarly Research Network 2012-09-13 /pmc/articles/PMC3449120/ /pubmed/23008777 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/704246 Text en Copyright © 2012 José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Reis et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Reis, José Maurício dos Santos Nunes Jorge, Érica Gouveia Ribeiro, João Gustavo Rabelo Pinelli, Ligia Antunes Pereira Abi-Rached, Filipe de Oliveira Tanomaru-Filho, Mário Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images |
title | Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images |
title_full | Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images |
title_fullStr | Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images |
title_full_unstemmed | Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images |
title_short | Radiopacity Evaluation of Contemporary Luting Cements by Digitization of Images |
title_sort | radiopacity evaluation of contemporary luting cements by digitization of images |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449120/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23008777 http://dx.doi.org/10.5402/2012/704246 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT reisjosemauriciodossantosnunes radiopacityevaluationofcontemporarylutingcementsbydigitizationofimages AT jorgeericagouveia radiopacityevaluationofcontemporarylutingcementsbydigitizationofimages AT ribeirojoaogustavorabelo radiopacityevaluationofcontemporarylutingcementsbydigitizationofimages AT pinelliligiaantunespereira radiopacityevaluationofcontemporarylutingcementsbydigitizationofimages AT abirachedfilipedeoliveira radiopacityevaluationofcontemporarylutingcementsbydigitizationofimages AT tanomarufilhomario radiopacityevaluationofcontemporarylutingcementsbydigitizationofimages |