Cargando…

Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS

Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in numerous scientific studies over the past decade. However, the possibility to apply tDCS in therapy of neuropsychiatric disorders is still debated. While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been approved for treatment of majo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neuling, Toralf, Wagner, Sven, Wolters, Carsten H., Zaehle, Tino, Herrmann, Christoph S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Research Foundation 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00083
_version_ 1782244329128984576
author Neuling, Toralf
Wagner, Sven
Wolters, Carsten H.
Zaehle, Tino
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_facet Neuling, Toralf
Wagner, Sven
Wolters, Carsten H.
Zaehle, Tino
Herrmann, Christoph S.
author_sort Neuling, Toralf
collection PubMed
description Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in numerous scientific studies over the past decade. However, the possibility to apply tDCS in therapy of neuropsychiatric disorders is still debated. While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been approved for treatment of major depression in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tDCS is not as widely accepted. One of the criticisms against tDCS is the lack of spatial specificity. Focality is limited by the electrode size (35 cm(2) are commonly used) and the bipolar arrangement. However, a current flow through the head directly from anode to cathode is an outdated view. Finite-element (FE) models have recently been used to predict the exact current flow during tDCS. These simulations have demonstrated that the current flow depends on tissue shape and conductivity. To face the challenge to predict the location, magnitude, and direction of the current flow induced by tDCS and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), we used a refined realistic FE modeling approach. With respect to the literature on clinical tDCS and tACS, we analyzed two common setups for the location of the stimulation electrodes which target the frontal lobe and the occipital lobe, respectively. We compared lateral and medial electrode configuration with regard to their usability. We were able to demonstrate that the lateral configurations yielded more focused stimulation areas as well as higher current intensities in the target areas. The high resolution of our simulation allows one to combine the modeled current flow with the knowledge of neuronal orientation to predict the consequences of tDCS and tACS. Our results not only offer a basis for a deeper understanding of the stimulation sites currently in use for clinical applications but also offer a better interpretation of observed effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3449241
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Frontiers Research Foundation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-34492412012-09-26 Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS Neuling, Toralf Wagner, Sven Wolters, Carsten H. Zaehle, Tino Herrmann, Christoph S. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) has been applied in numerous scientific studies over the past decade. However, the possibility to apply tDCS in therapy of neuropsychiatric disorders is still debated. While transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) has been approved for treatment of major depression in the United States by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), tDCS is not as widely accepted. One of the criticisms against tDCS is the lack of spatial specificity. Focality is limited by the electrode size (35 cm(2) are commonly used) and the bipolar arrangement. However, a current flow through the head directly from anode to cathode is an outdated view. Finite-element (FE) models have recently been used to predict the exact current flow during tDCS. These simulations have demonstrated that the current flow depends on tissue shape and conductivity. To face the challenge to predict the location, magnitude, and direction of the current flow induced by tDCS and transcranial alternating current stimulation (tACS), we used a refined realistic FE modeling approach. With respect to the literature on clinical tDCS and tACS, we analyzed two common setups for the location of the stimulation electrodes which target the frontal lobe and the occipital lobe, respectively. We compared lateral and medial electrode configuration with regard to their usability. We were able to demonstrate that the lateral configurations yielded more focused stimulation areas as well as higher current intensities in the target areas. The high resolution of our simulation allows one to combine the modeled current flow with the knowledge of neuronal orientation to predict the consequences of tDCS and tACS. Our results not only offer a basis for a deeper understanding of the stimulation sites currently in use for clinical applications but also offer a better interpretation of observed effects. Frontiers Research Foundation 2012-09-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3449241/ /pubmed/23015792 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00083 Text en Copyright © 2012 Neuling, Wagner, Wolters, Zaehle and Herrmann. http://www.frontiersin.org/licenseagreement This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in other forums, provided the original authors and source are credited and subject to any copyright notices concerning any third-party graphics etc.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Neuling, Toralf
Wagner, Sven
Wolters, Carsten H.
Zaehle, Tino
Herrmann, Christoph S.
Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
title Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
title_full Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
title_fullStr Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
title_full_unstemmed Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
title_short Finite-Element Model Predicts Current Density Distribution for Clinical Applications of tDCS and tACS
title_sort finite-element model predicts current density distribution for clinical applications of tdcs and tacs
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3449241/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23015792
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00083
work_keys_str_mv AT neulingtoralf finiteelementmodelpredictscurrentdensitydistributionforclinicalapplicationsoftdcsandtacs
AT wagnersven finiteelementmodelpredictscurrentdensitydistributionforclinicalapplicationsoftdcsandtacs
AT wolterscarstenh finiteelementmodelpredictscurrentdensitydistributionforclinicalapplicationsoftdcsandtacs
AT zaehletino finiteelementmodelpredictscurrentdensitydistributionforclinicalapplicationsoftdcsandtacs
AT herrmannchristophs finiteelementmodelpredictscurrentdensitydistributionforclinicalapplicationsoftdcsandtacs